See, Graph, what I said. "Density" is a word stolen from physics to mean something else, and in this definition it is identical to how others use sefirah and aeon, and in fact persona. It's just an enumerated list of core concepts that have a rough order but are all just feelgood touchstones. "Wisdom" (hochma, sophia) is already a sefirah and an aeon both, for instance. The "octave" (ogdoad, 7/12) concept is also shared among them all.

I could simply declare myself to be a seventh- or higher-"density" being who is busy increasing earth vibes and nobody could gainsay me. I am, you know.

If I pretended that "density" referred to a fullness as opposed to an emptiness, and stated that one could have greater or lesser matter per space, that great lovers are "denser", there'd be some justification, but nobody talks that way. If I substituted mass, for instance, oh, I'm a 6th-mass being in a 3rd-mass earth, you see how ridiculous it sounds. If we said "degree" or "grade" that's how people talk. (Mental note: ridicule Masons by deliberately confusing "degrees" with elementary "grades".) In atoms, which do have seven successive orbits, we might speak of uranium being a 7th-orbit element, because orbits are progressive but densities are discrete measurements. If the paradigm were (insanely) that the progression is so strict that one "density" must become sufficiently fully dense before a person can progress to the next, then you might argue that one leads to another and, oh, I've mastered 5 densities and am getting dense in the 6th. But I'm pretty confident that's not the system. Nobody says it's impossible to have any wisdom until you've mastered all love.

So, thanks for the opportunity for me to rant at yet another abuse of language, probably worse than the abuse of the word "dimension". What they really mean is just kabbalah but they're disguising it by using a vague word "density" that has no real application. A big mark of really bad theology is the inability to use words precisely.

You've also got that self-other failure going in the AI's source: true self-service is rightly called enlightened self-interest and is the same as true other-service. Further, there's the strong vibe of narrative control, namely a responsiveness to Christian revelation by trying to craft a narrative that distract people, when seeing the Christian revelation literally unfold, into thinking something else is happening (self-directed control rather than self-other balanced control).

Last year I looked into a couple Christian mystics. They too love to speak of progressive itineraries of numbered steps. So do name-it claim-it proponents of The Secret. Every time, the enumeration is just something somebody made up in school one day. Every time, Graph. Most such lists can be defended with great rationalization; in that sense they're all perfect and in fact none contradict each other. At the same time, that perfection arises from them all being so vague that little distinction is being made, little teaching is transpiring even though words and knowledge are flowing. So in one sense such lists are "mostly harmless", but in another sense they're just so wasteful that direct statement is more helpful in progressing the individual.

Now, I'll level with you, while typing this I should not neglect my own recent post on dimensions. There are similarities and differences. A big difference is that I'm earnestly synthesizing several subthemes into one theory in the same way that elements have a periodic table, and I noted a few alignments that suggest that further physical and mathematical discoveries might follow an orderly progression; that's scientific speculation and not dogma. A similarity is that I did make use of an implicative passage in Proverbs to supply a few names and concepts, which could be charged as arbitrary. Well, if people get cultic about my idea, contrary to my intent, and become dogmatic that it must be the only core truth because that's how I wrote it, then it would become what I warn against. But when I see something like Ra Material, it's clear that people are just using a comfy narrative to sell stuff and to propagate ideas that make people feel good. And the motive is never, hey, join in the quest for truth and improve what we have (which is scientific method); the motive is always, memorize our slop better than we do, climb faster and higher over others who are doing the same, just for the status that those under you will accord you, until we release next year's slop. Perhaps you post this with some distance, as you often do, and you put it out merely for my rant; I'll give you full credit if that's the case. But to you I would say, don't waste time learning the counterfeits when we have the real accessible anytime, closer than we think because we trained ourselves to ignore it, truer than we can hope because it's greater than all shadows.