Please submit requests for the next round table discussion in this thread for vote.
Post will stay active for 3 days and highest submission will get it's own stickied thread.
Side bar has a link to previous round tables:
https://scored.co/c/conspiracies/wiki/wiki_links/
We can have a discussion on whether or not free will exists. Discuss if every action we do is already predetermined by how our brain is wired, with the environment around us being the inputs.
We can also have a discussion on whether or not humans have souls and analyze the evidence for and against us just being our bodies.
Predetermination, Freewill, and Souls
Absolutely! Have you considered that none of them contradict one another?
Looks like I'm on my way to voting every suggestion up.
Make simpler community rules that promote free speech and the discovery of truth easier while keeping discourse civil and productive.
I think they are pretty simple, I also would like things to be civil and productive.
Too simple to the point of being ambiguous. Also, if these rules can be used to hurt the law of the land or worse Natural Law, they're not based on sound principles thus not good.
Good thing these rules aren't doing that. Good things are often simple, though maybe not easy.
What kind of soup letter statement is that? You completely avoided the ambiguity question raised on my argument.
I'm thinking of updating rule 3 but that's about it, everything else is pretty self explanatory.
Community Rules
I agree with discussion but it need not be a roundtable since it's already going. Maybe a little more formality or analysis structure there.
Who elected you as the scored supreme leader? I missed that coup d'eta of yours.
As far as I know apart from your little clique no one likes you very much so it would be prudent on your part not to assume what everyone wants.
“What is the structure of the societal control system? Who is at the top? Who’s below them? Who’s below them? How do they maintain their control? How do they shut down opposition to their control? At each level of the hierarchy, how much does the average individual understand about the system as a whole?”
I feel like it’s time to systematize many of our vague notions, so I think a community discussion in that vein could be valuable
The Control System
Agreed. It's easier to run with discussion topics the community is behind than to post a fresh one when there's a good one already.
I'm going to stick with the Bible as usual and emphasize that the top is always "the satan" whether or not more than one entity has claimed this title in history. We can also safely call all active advocates satanists, but we should also be cautious about quick assignment of individuals as satanists.
There is no formal structure (see C. S. Lewis's chapter on "Elasticity") but there are unwritten and thus malleable rules. Everything is fear-driven and nothing is dependable. Important: This allows everyone to think their circle is the innermost and to think they are the real movers and shakers, such that nobody can tell who really is (Lewis again, and Quigley on Rhodes's will).
I would love to spend a week reviewing the historical "cabal" (still looking for the best word for it; maybe PTB or Exousiai) and its methods, especially collaboratively with others who are seeking a community consensus we can run with. This is only a taste.
Pyramid.
Jews, aka admins.
Mods.
We are.
Monopoly on infrastructure, specifically discussion forums.
By stifling free speech with censorship, duh.
Doesn't matter. The higher you go, the less they care about human rights and freedoms.
I notice you haven’t made a post here in days - not afraid of a girl are you?
Really, you think the buck stops there? No synagogue of Satan above them? No black cube of Saturn worshippers pulling their strings? I feel like you’re giving some seriously undue credit here. And that’s coming from someone who would recommend ”The Culture of Critique” to anyone reading this thread:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture_of_Critique_series
Still jews
Also jews. See Anton Levey.
Nice and simple - unfortunately real life is rarely so
I guess it’s fitting that joseph goebbels thinks he knows more than the big JC
Inb4”butjewswrotethat!” - regardless of your overall thoughts on the Bible/Christianity/Christians, this is still the best fitting argument
As you're simping to the female species. Go ahead, follow her lead. That apple is delicious! 🤣
Now the Bible is true? It literally only took one comment for you to flip. Schitzo moment
I never doubted it. You're trying to gaslight. It won't work, simp 😎
Women in power are more tyrannical than men in power
seriously?
a) Fortune implies "chance"; real life implies "choice"...taking a chance costs choice, hence gambling.
b) Simple implies singular (perception) within singularity (perceivable)...choosing to take a chance on another (suggestion) shapes simple into complex.
Who came before John? Matthew: "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven."
There can be only one...it's that simple. To ignore that inverts ones choice into a chosen one.
In this context...plurality equals lie; singularity equals truth. It's not the jews; it's each jew...for there can be only one.
Synagogue aka syn (together) + agein (put in motion)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/synagogue hence also keneseth - "assembly"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Knesset
Satan implies "to oppose"; Synagogue implies "to assemble"...each jew tempts gentiles to assemble, while opposing the ensemble for being against the singularity of God.
“nOw ThErE aRe TwO oF tHeM!!” aka “somehow, Highlander has returned”
Didn't watch John Wick; never heard of Henry Cavil, and the last Russel Crowe movie I remember was Romper Stomper...
Atheism implies circular reasoning. https://i.imgflip.com/aizblu.jpg
DON'T be an atheist.
Notice the use of belief and morality within the "atheist" graphic...
Very curious you reduce such an all encompassing topic to such a trivial thing as this platform. Or maybe that was Graphenium's intent?
I wholeheartedly concur
An artificial circle shaped within a natural line aka circular thinking during linear procession.
Linear procession (inception towards death) implies being (life) in-between...it's circular thinking which turns top against bottom.
By con (together) trol (to roll)...it's the inward circle (logic) turning outwards (reason) which keeps control in place.
Opposition (one side vs another) implies con (together) trol (to roll).
a) Understanding implies "standing under" which establishes the artificial levels of hierarchy.
b) Sys-tem (standing together) contradicts whole separating each partial from one another.
"REEEEE muh words!"