There’s something up with geometric shapes.
Someone once said signs and symbols rule the world.
The G in the Freemason logo means geometry and the logo is made with tools to make geometric shapes.
The other day a shill accidentally revealed the circle with the star sign extracts energy from people. Then he deleted his account.
That circle star and other shapes like the Saturn symbol are found in many car logos which are seen by all when they drive.
Rothvhild once made a forum posts and empathizes that nature doesn’t have straight lines but shapes do.
Words act as manifesting tools because what we speak we usually believe and the law of faith attracts what we say to us. Do shapes have a similar effect?
Even the hex shape on the North Pole of Saturn also appears as a cube. They say this shape is used to hex earth but how? The only thing I found is that the shape represent the pattern of the soul and that the cube represent a prison. They also have a square with a circle inside which represents caging the infinite soul.
Another shill once mentioned the triangle represents the minimum opening shape for a portal and that the points represents energy, knowledge and willpower.
Lastly Modevil Cathedrals were made in a particular shape on purpose by the knight Templar.
What’s going on with these specific shapes appearing everywhere? Are they energy extractors?
I know the loosh harvested is moved around by those obelisks so these occult shapes might be part of that system.
Its never been revealed what the G stands for while some say its for Gnosis...
“Grand Architect” iirc
The G is also an assimilation of the Fibbonacci curve, the gamel as vessel/vehicle and the number seven for reasons.
DIVINE geometry precedes physical geometry. Only the deepest dive finds the pearl.
Things to know:
https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf
It has something to do with how reality is projected. I think it starts with geometric shapes.
Go ahead and read the book linked if you truly want answers.
I read the book and it didn't answer the question I just asked you in a different thread. It is an example of what I said in this thread, namely that symbols have neutral meanings and people can direct symbols in various directions but the truth remains they are just symbols.
Perusing is not reading and reading is not necessarily understanding. Your take proves to me you merely perused if that and you don't belong in the conversation at that level. Sorry. Put on the big boy pants and try again. If you insist on denying points, be concise about what points exactly, and why and how they are wrong.
As another author you haven't read, Carl Jung would tell you, symbols are NOT 'just symbols' or your cross is to no effect as well.
Last time Fideler was posted, I read it thoroughly and understood it sufficiently. I didn't feel a need to debunk much of it because so much was on the level I described here, symbolic connotations that appeal to minorities that need not be affirmed or denied by majorities who are unaware of the connotations.
I didn't say symbols have no effect, but a cross has no effect to a person who's never seen one. The cross, like any word, has effect because of cultural transmission of connotation in stable forms (languages), and that is just what symbols mean.
Anyway, you seem to have answered my other question without reference to Fideler, so Fideler must not be that important to the answer. I'll focus there instead.
Not sure why the messenger is killed in the attempt to enlighten. The subject is what needs the attention.
The book correctly argues that the Trinity concept was before Judaism and Christianity. The trinity concept was taught by one of the first prophets in history way before Atlantis.
The Trinity Father, Son and Holy Spirit is really God split up into 3. The center nucleus is the Father (not as in gender though, this is pure energy) who is the personality of God, Christ which is the younger version and body of God, and Holy Spirit which is "outside of God". The Christ in the middle decides what to experience and the Holy Spirit becomes the experience while the Father inside offers good ideas to the Son similar to thought form. The Christ is then the Word that speaks what it wants to experience.
Jesus Christ (Yeshua de Josef) is basically the version of Christ in the upper area of the Universe while his body on Earth was his lower self but his supreme wisdom make even his lower self good. He was not of a virgin Mother. That was one of the things the Saturn Death Cult changed in the Bible to make it sound like their own religious beliefs. Mary was no virgin at all and many of the old cult beliefs were dragged into Christianity sometimes intentionally and sometimes through habit by the old occultists who converted to Christianity.
As any history book will show, The Council at Nicea was about this very concept. The gnostic fathers posited that to divide God into 3 was indeed polytheistic hyperdispensation which did not exist, for which they were murdered as reward in opposition to the new Pax Romana being formed. This same argument was being fought over in the Judaic Wars and was the very cause, apart from other obvious political machinations. God as Three is Polytheism by definition. God is ONE is the tradition, not the exception that 3 was, and is.
I know a little something about the subject, as I encountered the same issue when the 'String Theory' was presented to me by the head of cognitive scientists who coined the theory/term 'String Theory'. . In conversation, I posited a change in the name to 'String, Drum or Magic theory, 'depending on your perspective' to show that it was exactly a matter OF perspective that divides cognition/reality/God into three, rather than seeing it as the ONE that it truly is. This was successful in that the name was changed. I utilized the Monochord used by Pythagorus to teach harmony to students, with a single string plucked at measured points providing insight to the nature of harmony and mathematics. Again two subjects by perspective, but one in reality. I knew that introducing the concept of Spirit as 'that which bring the 'two' together as ONE, not Three, would not be accepted by science, so I used the term 'magic' as it is invisible. This was accepted for a time as it corrected inconsistencies in the original String theory. But I waited to see if they would be able to see the three as ONE, and they failed. They now attempt to remove the spirit as 'M', but don't know how to remove the inconvenient truthbomb. I didn't have time to explain the 'magic' as spirit, or to show how it becomes its own polytheistic 'trinity' when divided and isn't reconsilable ultimately. This a rarified subject and one who can't reach the height of it will always attempt to cast down those who see it. Misery loves company and project iniquity onto its subject-victim.
God is ONE not three. Christos is an ancient Greek philosophical concept term, not a blasphemous hyperdispensational god-man of polytheism. This was the argument of the jews against their usurpers, and the gnostics against theirs. The 'winner' of this argument by the murderous slanderers at Nicea became the focal point of the Pax Romana and 'Christianity' then became a roman state religion of control through dogma. None of these points are opinions, and neither bad science, nor bad religion can replace its inconvenient truths.
The gnostics were right if they said dividing God into three was polytheistic, but in those days there are several evidences that teachers knew the difference between tritheism and prototrinitarianism. Those tritheists who lurked were despised by Jew and Christian alike. The Jews wrote and recited the Birkat haMinim against these cultic tritheists (also ditheists) and other Judaizing sectarians, while the Christians ignored it because it didn't apply to them.
Also, no gnostics were murdered to my knowledge, you seem to be thinking of something else.
It's great to hear you contributed to M-theory and give some background. To the point at hand, if it's perspective that cognizes three, what happens when the One cognizes Himself? My answer is that He can cognize "Himself" as One, and He can also cognize "Himself Cognizing Himself" as Three (lover, love, beloved). One matter, two or three witnesses, is also the ancient rule. Therefore, we can cognize "God is not three" in your sense, but we need not contradict those who with different meaning are able to cognize "God is three".
"Christos" as used by Hebrew thinkers is exactly a translation of an ancient Hebrew term for the anointed ruler, used by David in 1000 BC without any Greek philosophy. It was never used for polytheism (except by the minor cults I allude to) and didn't connote or require any polytheism.
Nicea heard all the arguments and got 99% approval for its summary, with only three objectors who wouldn't budge, led by Arius. The minority's concerns were that what word by which we describe Jesus's "divine" nature as can only be a word that also applies to creation, because we have no word for the uncreated, only negations (a proper application of apophatic theology). This concern was not understood by the Niceans until much later, so the Arian churches continued to have gains in Western Europe for a couple centuries more because of calculated ambiguity on both sides.
Separately, the several Chalcedonian theology debates were closer to home and all the major wings retained their polities until in the 20th century they were all basically resolved semantically by agreement on essentials and liberty on understood frameworks of phrasing. I believe this is possible for those who continue Arian traditions today too. If you're interested in such a resolution, I'd suggest you first start by admitting the reality of what all the primitive Christians knew, the difference between polytheism and a monotheism that recognizes differences of cognition. Without making semantic adjustments for context your statement would not be read by trinitarians as truths or facts but as opinions and althist. The way to repair that breach is to speak honestly about what the prototrinitarians actually said, and the difference from what tritheists were separately accused of saying. Start with the fact that Paul was accused of polytheism for teaching "Jesus and Anastasia": that indicates what the true polytheists were actually teaching, by Paul being mistaken for one of them.
Again, Arius was a messenger, not the message. I feel no need to bring him up except in historic perspective as a victim of 'killing the messenger'.
The tech doesn't make sense unless Mary was a virgin. If you change Jesus's parentage you change the whole being you claim as God. Your first two paragraphs were fine but nobody ever presents evidence of these alleged Bible changes or claims of cabal power. More likely the cabal only wants to have exercised such power so they get shills to believe they did, much cheaper for them.
Read the Saturn Death Cult book. It explains it all.
The Freemason King James is another famous one that make lots of changes.
One of the biggest he made was to remove all mentions that Jesus meditated everyday from the Bible. This was done to make people forget how to get mentally closer to God for healing, joy and knowledge.
Which one is the Saturn death cult book? It's not 2,097 pages, is it? Okay, that was a slight indirect dig, but I know you can take it.
Saturn Death Cult is on Amazon. Its like 200 pages.
I know. I know there is a psyop to "debunk" the Urantia files because the deep state is scared the people will learn the beautiful truth about life when they read it.
Yes, or "a" pearl.
Gimel is the third dimension. The third naturally connects to the seventh via powers of two.
Fideler is not the best source, general and special revelation is.
The best source is the principle itself. Judging the messenger often takes the place of accurate critique.
Rather than third dimension, perhaps third 'world' is more accurate as this world includes the third dimension as does the cube, the representation of the 3rd dimension by the second.
Mental illness.
Agent Smith identified.
Get some help. You and the stormfaggots. Both delusional retards who think their fiction makes sense.
When are you going to throw in the towel agent Smith? When the banks shut down?
I'll stop posting here when the stormfaggots are banned from speaking or it's legal to kill them.
The new mods in my experience do not ban people from speaking for viewpoint, but only for violation of objective rules not related to viewpoint. Your viewpoint against free speech is not bannable either, but your behavior independent of viewpoint can be.
Mods are already removing factual statements.
I've explained to malta, and one removal was an error and I then approved it but you all gotta watch your words too.
I'm looking over the evidence myself. You speak in the plural, you should be able to list two explicit examples. Also in my experience, appeal is appropriate via modmail, admin, or community support. If you frame an appeal to the community as your being willing to accept its collective review of your evidence, it probably wouldn't be excessive meta. But the speed of your accusation suggests you might be jumping the gun.
Motion delineates (inception towards death); which permits matter (life) to shape...few suggest geometry aka geomancy to tempt many to hold onto shapes instead of shaping.
Nature departs each thing from one another...few sum many things together. There's no sum of thing (something) within nature unless one thing takes a geo-metric measurement of other things.
Rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule Straight delineation (inception towards death) generates each diverse shape (life). Few cast (bol) together (sym) identifying marks; tokens; omens (signs) to distract many from delineation.
a) G implies generation aka each matter generated within all motion...meaning implies a measurement taken by matter, while ignoring motion.
b) Free implies ones "free" will of choice; mason implies "to knead; fashion; fit", and logo implies "logic"...few tempt many to misuse free will of choice to knead; fashion; fit logic (circular thinking) while ignoring delineation.
Energy delineates internal power aka from action into reaction aka cause to effect aka motion to matter aka loss to growth aka all to one...a circle is shaped by putting the beginning and end of a line together, thereby short-cutting delineation.
People implies a summation of each departed person...joining a summation (consenting to a suggestion) permits few to extract wasted energy from many.
As for the star-shape: "people they come together; people they fall apart; no one can stop us now; cause we're all made of stars"... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/moby/weareallmadeofstars.html
Accident implies "coming by chance"...being implies "coming into choice" which is how nature reveals being. Few tempt many to ignore given choice by taking chances, which is called "gambling" and inverts intention into accident.
All drives (inception towards death) each steering vehicle (life)...few suggest car/chariot aka charon, the ferryman who takes us to the realm of the dead to automate the mobility of many. In simple...suggested progressivism tempts life to drive towards death instead of resisting the push/pull of delineation.
Nature implies the one and only straight line (inception towards death) for each shaped form (life) within, and since being implies in-between entrance and exit...one cannot perceive the line; only derive discernment from being within delineation.
Few tempt many to "toe the line" by suggesting consensus to conformity; rules and standards aka by following orders. If one follow the natural order; then one shortens ones life-line aka reducing ones growth into a flat-line.
Shapes cannot do...only line does; which allows form to re-do shapes aka shaping/forming aka transformation aka transfer of form within motion.
Sound acts; instrument re-acts...words tempt instrument to ignore sound for words shaped by another instrument.
Instrument implies mind structured within sound...words tempt ones mind to be conducted by another, while ignoring that sound offers instruments the free will of choice to shape freely.
To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another aka a contract binding ones free will of choice. Speech implies the articulation of natural sound...only nature allows being to freely shape; while artifice confines ones choice to a chosen one.
Gentiles think in words a jew shaped within sound to confine thought to programmable languages. Only within sound can one think straight (across), while words confine thought to an inward (logic) and outward (reason) circle/kikel/kike...
Faith tempts one to hold onto, while ignoring that natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies a separation from one another.
Only within same cause can there be each diverse effect...affection to one another shapes similarity among effects.
Appearance implies "to come into view"...ones view implies left/right + up/down + front/back aka from within a cube (kabah) of all (allah). Few tempt many to draw a circle around the cube as to confine linear perception to circular suggestion.
Hex implies six (seco; to divide) + hexe (witch; which) + hexte (devil; to throw apart)...nature divides by throwing apart (inception towards death) being (life).
So which/witch one does one choose...natural perception or artificial suggestion? Holding onto the shape of the latter puts a hex on one.
Soul/sole - "one and only", hence pattern/patron/patri - "father"...it's claiming soul for self or buying and selling to another, which tempts one to ignore that.
Not prison (confinement), but prism which refracts light and spreads it within a spectrum.
Motion (light) > momentum (spectrum) > matter (refraction)...
Logic represents the inside circle; reason the outside circle. Square implies one side of a cube (left+right; up/down; front/back).
Logic tempts mind to choose a side over the other, while reason turns both sides against one another (left vs right; up vs down; front vs back)...if one chooses one side, then one ignores being within the whole (allah) cube (kabah).
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Huey-lewis-and-the-news-hip-to-be-square-lyrics
Bonus: hip/hep - "cry to instigate attacks on jews in Europe, 1819 in reference to jewish expulsions by mobs in various German cities in that year (later called the hep-hep riots)"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hep#etymonline_v_9165
Putting together upward triangle (3) and downward triangle (3) aka 33 establishes the six-pointed star aka 666...
Point implies "end of sentence"...coming into being implies living sentience sentenced from inception towards point of death. A point tempts one to ignore being within a linear procession, which is how energy internally divides power.
Aka cathode aka kata (down) hodos (way)...as opposed to anode aka ana (up) hodos (way).
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies anode (growth) within cathode (loss)...few suggest cathode to tempt anode to annul itself by joining together manifold.
There is no fucking way you sat down and wrote this.
Can't be free while confining self to a chair so it's more of a stand up kinda situation.
Always on the fly while drawing from inspiration (besides the copied links)...
There are no magic shapes. They have no power. The belief that they do is a psy op and just makes its believers look dumb.
Shapes are aspects of dimension and in particular they communicate just like letters and numbers do. While writing about dimensions I saw much about the core pattern of shapes, letters, and numbers in general.
Each shape has a core concept cluster that is typically neutral but that can easily be "spun" for good or ill. To the pure all things are pure, so if you use a shape for a good purpose that cannot be tainted. When another communicates a bad purpose for a shape, it is only received to the degree you are out of practice with good purposes such that you have nothing to counterweigh the communication with. So to those who have no grounding it's easy to think of a shape as corrupt, and to them it is more corrupting than not. To those with grounding the bad purpose is just something to laugh at.
God made the hexagon so that bees could give us honey. God told Solomon to build a cube room overlaid entirely with gold so that he could meet with us. Man comes along and (1) forms a word "hex" with two meanings, (2) names a hexagonally marked planet "Saturn" with satanic overtones, (3) builds cubical prisons, (4) wears small black cubes religiously, (5) venerates and circumambulates a large black cube religiously, (6) uses the hexagon within a hexagram for a wide variety of purposes (some of which are more questionable, like Hinduism and Zionism), (7) etc. Now all these things have capacity to distract from God's general and special revelation. But they need not. The "hex" doesn't land if you have asked for protection from evils from one who is able.
So the fact that a few people invented a code (an association of meaning with some shape, word, gesture, or signal) doesn't mean we need to understand the code. If it's for the public to understand, the public will be considerately included in the ability to learn the code; if it's meant to be private, it's not necessary for the public generally to know. If someone speaks in a language I don't know, it's usually unimportant. If someone intends evil, natural law will cause that person to be found out and punished sooner or later, and I need not concern myself with being the punisher unless I am appointed.
There's a little energy transfer present in incantations and symbols, but it's mostly just to scoop up unguarded energy. When someone is just scrolling thoughtlessly, their defenses against shocking memes are low (as in low-hanging fruit). A spell has no effect on the person who has learned how not to be hypnotized. So shapes participate in attractive force like words, but they are a limited and inexact language and thus are more like trawling nets than directed energy. Architecture has more power because more energy is input, and that does cast broader spells and includes regions of high specialization, but even that cannot defeat ordinary preparations against spellcraft.