There’s something up with geometric shapes.
Someone once said signs and symbols rule the world.
The G in the Freemason logo means geometry and the logo is made with tools to make geometric shapes.
The other day a shill accidentally revealed the circle with the star sign extracts energy from people. Then he deleted his account.
That circle star and other shapes like the Saturn symbol are found in many car logos which are seen by all when they drive.
Rothvhild once made a forum posts and empathizes that nature doesn’t have straight lines but shapes do.
Words act as manifesting tools because what we speak we usually believe and the law of faith attracts what we say to us. Do shapes have a similar effect?
Even the hex shape on the North Pole of Saturn also appears as a cube. They say this shape is used to hex earth but how? The only thing I found is that the shape represent the pattern of the soul and that the cube represent a prison. They also have a square with a circle inside which represents caging the infinite soul.
Another shill once mentioned the triangle represents the minimum opening shape for a portal and that the points represents energy, knowledge and willpower.
Lastly Modevil Cathedrals were made in a particular shape on purpose by the knight Templar.
What’s going on with these specific shapes appearing everywhere? Are they energy extractors?
I know the loosh harvested is moved around by those obelisks so these occult shapes might be part of that system.
I read the book and it didn't answer the question I just asked you in a different thread. It is an example of what I said in this thread, namely that symbols have neutral meanings and people can direct symbols in various directions but the truth remains they are just symbols.
Perusing is not reading and reading is not necessarily understanding. Your take proves to me you merely perused if that and you don't belong in the conversation at that level. Sorry. Put on the big boy pants and try again. If you insist on denying points, be concise about what points exactly, and why and how they are wrong.
As another author you haven't read, Carl Jung would tell you, symbols are NOT 'just symbols' or your cross is to no effect as well.
Last time Fideler was posted, I read it thoroughly and understood it sufficiently. I didn't feel a need to debunk much of it because so much was on the level I described here, symbolic connotations that appeal to minorities that need not be affirmed or denied by majorities who are unaware of the connotations.
I didn't say symbols have no effect, but a cross has no effect to a person who's never seen one. The cross, like any word, has effect because of cultural transmission of connotation in stable forms (languages), and that is just what symbols mean.
Anyway, you seem to have answered my other question without reference to Fideler, so Fideler must not be that important to the answer. I'll focus there instead.
Not sure why the messenger is killed in the attempt to enlighten. The subject is what needs the attention.