Arnold Fruchtenbaum uncovered that Emperor Justinian first gave the title "tsar" or "caesar" to outsiders by awarding it to the Bulgarian khans in 705. With the weakening of the Empire, Bulgarian Simeon I in 913 was the first to take the title as hereditary for his dynasty, which was long before Ivan III was the first Russian to call himself tsar in 1472. This is meaningful because both czars and kaisers have represented the continuation of the Roman power in the same name: both America and Russia now declare themselves lords of czars. Thus there has long been an east-west balance of power that inherits the mantle of the Roman empire and which the devil is trying to infiltrate for his globalist empire.
There was no "Roman power" in that areas. In the largest possible state of Roman Empire, it didn't really expanded further than south beach of Black Sea.
Roman Empire had too short hands for that regions, and never had any noticeable influence over them.
There was much more Greek cultural, linguistic, traditional, religious influence, not Roman.
The only trace of Roman Empire in that region could be Romania. At least, their language have Latin roots, but they are Orthodox Christians, and never was Catolics.
All that "tzar"/"caezar", "Moscow is a Third Rome, and there will never be Fourth one" and so on things have nothing to do with Roman Empire, it is all about Christianity, that in Orthodox tradition developed trough Ancient Rome (first Rome, lost its title after Catolic schism in 1054), Byzantium (Second Rome, lost its title after defeat from Ottoman Empire in 1453) and eventually Moscow took that title as an only Imperial ancestor of Orthodox Christianity.
Arnold Fruchtenbaum uncovered that Emperor Justinian first gave the title "tsar" or "caesar" to outsiders by awarding it to the Bulgarian khans in 705. With the weakening of the Empire, Bulgarian Simeon I in 913 was the first to take the title as hereditary for his dynasty, which was long before Ivan III was the first Russian to call himself tsar in 1472. This is meaningful because both czars and kaisers have represented the continuation of the Roman power in the same name: both America and Russia now declare themselves lords of czars. Thus there has long been an east-west balance of power that inherits the mantle of the Roman empire and which the devil is trying to infiltrate for his globalist empire.
u/SmithW1984
There was no "Roman power" in that areas. In the largest possible state of Roman Empire, it didn't really expanded further than south beach of Black Sea.
Roman Empire had too short hands for that regions, and never had any noticeable influence over them.
There was much more Greek cultural, linguistic, traditional, religious influence, not Roman.
The only trace of Roman Empire in that region could be Romania. At least, their language have Latin roots, but they are Orthodox Christians, and never was Catolics.
All that "tzar"/"caezar", "Moscow is a Third Rome, and there will never be Fourth one" and so on things have nothing to do with Roman Empire, it is all about Christianity, that in Orthodox tradition developed trough Ancient Rome (first Rome, lost its title after Catolic schism in 1054), Byzantium (Second Rome, lost its title after defeat from Ottoman Empire in 1453) and eventually Moscow took that title as an only Imperial ancestor of Orthodox Christianity.