Centralized internet is one giant psy op for behavioral and mind control, globalization and mass surveillance. Every person using it is compromised to some extent.
I think it's good to remind ourselves of what we're dealing with and anticipate where things are going. I regret caving in and going on social media a few years ago.
Speaking of those who aren't people. Have you noticed they all follow a similar playbook of engagement?
You ask them a question, they stonewall, they ask another question that's barely related or pretend they didn't understand and then go straight into ridicule. Eventually they just post text with links to some dumb meme or something. It doesn't feel like real human behavior, just propagandist trolling.
You know what they remind me of, the early 9/11 "debunker" trolls. It's always deflect, joke, ridicule, but never engage in good faith.
Exactly. This behavior is described in NATO's cognitive warfare whitepaper. Their agents are basically trolls who seek to derail public forums on the internet and make engaging in serious discourse online impossible. This way they don't have to deploy heavy handed obvious censorship like during the coof which elicits a strong reaction, while still getting to control the narrative through covert subversive means. Remember the NAFO trolls a few years back? This is it.
The funny thing about all this is that it's all in the open but they mind control and gaslight the dumbed down and confused public into falling for their bs. They know they can't fight the truth directly in logical discourse because they will loose and that's why they employ rhetorical devices, deception and fallacies to appear truthful. Their strategy exploits human weakness, laziness and ignorance which they can control through social engineering.
Did you read this, shills? You are not as smart as you think. We know your playbook and you're not fooling anyone here. In the end truth wins and all you lying goblins and your masters will burn for eternity. Now downvote this like you did with the post in hopes les people will see it.
I agree the internet (as with most technologies since 1900) was a mistake. Real life relationships and community have been shattered by it and people have become dumber. Social media only made it worse. I'm not convinced a decentralized internet would be much better.
Best thing to do is stay offline unless it's for something important, not leisure. Very hard to do in today's world however.
Yes, but like other great technologies, it's a double edged sword. It made the masses dumber and more degenerate for sure but it also gave smart people access to knowledge that was reserved for the elite class in the past.
Having red a lot of the elite's writings, it's possible that they do this for eugenic and dysgenic purposes. Jonas Salk called this the survival of the wisest. Both H.G. Wells and Bertrand Russell talked about how in the future people will literally be biologically engineered through diet and injections into two separate species. Huxley wrote about a future caste system in his Brave New World. Planned Parenthood director Dr. Day (in the Day tapes) gave a lecture in 1969 where he outlined the same agenda and reasoned in a similar manner.
It gives access to more knowledge, but does it actually lead to people having more knowledge? If it reduces your attention span, memory and addicts you to wasting your time then almost certainly not. You may get access to information that would have been difficult to find prior to the internet, but this is likely at the cost of remembering less, reading fewer books (or high quality information) and if you are young, getting a lower quality education. You likely also get information overload where you don't have sufficient time to process individual pieces of information, leading to less cognitive development, less recall and more stress. There's surely lots of other consequences that I've overlooked including ones yet to be discovered.
We're all products of the system to some extent and we live in it, but if one is aware of its mechanism and its purpose he can counter it and avoid the psychological traps. This requires discipline and good habits. If you decide to spend more time doom-scrolling instead of reading a book and researching it's on you. Being focused and productive takes effort and exertion - this is why the masses reject it because they are raised to be passive consumers. You have to limit your information and use fewer channels. Get rid of your smartphone and gadgets that require your constant attention. Don't watch or read mainstream outlets and stress out about stuff you have no power over. Don't get baited and sucked into every single issue that's propped up on the stage. Eat and sleep well, exercise and stay in the sun because all of this is crucial for your cognitive abilities. I think all of this falls under the "being smart" category. The system is the experiment and you have to learn the purpose behind everything you're given and understand how the engineers running it think.
Normies fail at those and they enter a feedback loop that makes them dumber and vice versa - good habits make you exponentially smarter and more capable with time. How you live determines who you are.
I totally agree. But the percentage of people with such wisdom and discipline is in the single digits at most. Even those people can't be disciplined all the time. These systems are designed to exploit human psychology. Humans on the whole aren't capable of functioning properly with these systems. It's like expecting a whale to live on land. So while we as individuals can do our best to avoid the negative consequences for ourselves and use the internet wisely, we still have to oppose its existence out of concern for our brothers and sisters.
Yes, I agree. The internet, like much other tech out of the 20-21th c, is a net negative. My point was that it's much like a poison that in the right hands can be used as a medicine or as a weapon against the enemy. But for the majority of people and for society as a whole it's a tragedy because it's used as a covert weapon against all of us. It's the greatest spycraft tool ever created.
👍
I don't care, let them come.
We're already living in a techno/bureaucratic hellscape. What are they going to do, put me in jail?
More like the China model where low social credit prevents you from using services and turns you into a pariah.
I'm already a pariah for not participating in the bread and circus game.
So buy BitchCoin amirite
Do whatever you believe is right. But don't come bitching in a few years about being financially enslaved to the beast system.
How are digishekels going to be any different? It's dependent on the same grid they control and you seem to think there's no way to unplug you from it.
Sure, if it comes to the government unplugging your electricity and internet bitcoin won't be an option. I'll be moving to a country where that's not the case.
Then it happens again, you move again, then it happens again... Eventually you run out of places to hide.
Everything works up to a point dude. If they eventually come to your house and shoot you in the back of the head, then what? "Ooh, look at that - bitcoin didn't save you from the bullet." BTC is not a silver bullet but it's the only shot at future sound money that's not gay ass fiat CBDC.
To study implies "strive towards"...action (inception towards death) strives towards reaction (reaction). The world wide web isn't about studying activity, but tempting lack of re-activity, hence confining it within an internal net.
Analysis implies a setting apart...a net and a web implies a synthesis luring together to make analysis harder for each one stuck within.
It requires willing consent to enter the web...so the internet is harvesting users as much as a zapper harvests flies.
Compromised by ignoring singularity (person) for plurality (every) aka ignoring oneself for one another, while giving few permission to summon many together.
Deal implies part (being) of a whole (nature)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/deal
Good implies versus bad aka partials turned against one another within a conflict called "reason".
What's the opposite of deal? Denial! Which is what few trick many into by choosing to deny ones SIGHT for a SIDE within a conflict against one another.
Things (life) go from origin (inception) towards outcome (death)...few suggest alternative outcomes and origins to tempt many to ignore alternation in-between.
Being within nature implies media+al (middle of all)...soc (together) lumps many beings together, which allows few to centralize control from within.
I don't know why you're worried, establishment tool.
You're still on the clock? What time is it in Israel right now?
Your cover is blown, everyone here knows you're an asset dude.
Asset? More like atheist.
He's not an atheist. Government trolls don't hold beliefs. He's whatever is useful to get his job done.
What really grinds the gears is his bashing of Kirk.
He's doing it to elicit a reaction. Trolls do that, just ignore him.
Haven't seen any evidence he is goverment. "troll" By that logic all who don't share our beliefs are trolls.
You're disagreeing with me rn. Are you a troll? No. So it isn't just about disagreeing, is it?
It's not just about his beliefs but about the mode and patterns of interaction. There are telltale signs.
More like Asshat
I swear your side thinks every failure can be deflected this way.
Not a deflection but a statement of facts. You're not gaslighting anyone in this day and age, perfidious jew.