The "Age of Aquarius" is New Age propaganda that uses the zodiac and impossible to confirm "ages" to date this "age of aquarius" or "age of pisces", which OP tries to promote.
Watch the documentary, their only argument is that the Sphinx looked like a lion and was pointed towards a theoretical position that has nothing to do with the constelations.
I know exactly any trap u/Graphenium may lay, my fren. In the prior threads I debunked the data pretty heavily (searchable if you like), but in this one since he wanted it as a roundtable I laid off from being quite so critical.
I find that God always is in any symbol before the devil can corrupt it. God put the stars in place, he calls the primary ones the Mazzaroth in the AV, and that includes what became known as the 48 constellations of the zodiac. He tells Job that the stars have specific functions, specifically the belt of what we call Orion, and others. The astronomical fact that the New Age plays off of is that the vernal sunrise takes place in Aquarius (is cusping there from Pisces over the next couple hundred years, it being a general period not making it less significant); and that we had three previous eras of about 2,000 years of Taurus, then Aries, then Pisces for the same vernal sunrise. This has a match to God's stated purposes for these eras and also to indications he works in millennial eras, this being the beginning of the seventh millennium. So I redirect the New Age stuff to points like that.
It might interest you both to be refreshed that the four constellations at cardinal points, Scorpius (as a winged serpent), Leo (lion), Taurus (bull), Aquarius (waterman), correspond to tribal affiliations of the four cardinal tribes among the twelve, which also (with eagle meaning winged serpent) correspond to the vision of Ezekiel 1 and to the four gospels traditionally symbolized as four aspects of Jesus's ministry. Matthew bull means Servant, Mark lion means King, Luke man means Son of Man, John eagle means Son of God. Let's look up the other one: Num. 2 has Judah east, Reuben south, Ephraim of Joseph west, Dan north, and Gen. 49 has Reuben waterman, Judah lion, Dan serpent, and Joseph only "strength" for the bull; but Deut. 33 has Joseph bull. This means that when the congregation camped, if they used tribal banners corresponding to their corresponding blessings, they would mimic on earth the shape of the zodiac in heaven.
Interesting to me, though, the order is not exactly the same; which suggests that the correspondence is not a map but an indication of paradigms that have some flexibility. For application it appears intended that God wants us to have an understanding of four paradigmatic personality types and roles indicated by these symbols, which can be expanded to twelve when detail is needed, and that these roles also form a sequence in the order of salvation (just as Virgo plays a role in Rev. 12 and seems to start the narrative cycle): serpent for sin, man for humility, bull for service, lion for reign.
The idea that the constellations can be used narratively as paradigms is wholly consonant with Scripture. Astrologers have so warped our understanding of the narrative that we forget that God put it there in the first place and abrogate our right to reclaim the zodiac for his original purposes. (In particular, by placing creation and flood as bookmarks in the key time of Taurus, the tribulation/rapture might be indicated in this key time of the beginning of Aquarius. That part I affirm, but I've pointed out the failure of science to demonstrate the validity of any of the other dates Graph bends over backwards for. In fact, with the irregularity of his schedule, it might be argued that he is more likely to predict the present to yield a nothingburger or an extinction than it is to yield an awakening, but on the young-earth schedule it's a certainty to yield an awakening to anyone who desires. So I don't know why he sticks with the weaker and corrupting version if that's his goal.)
The other part is clearly special pleading. Two hours to say the "lion" points east. That means he does look at whatever constellation has the vernal sunrise, but it's 100% silly IMHO to backdate him six thousand years just so that he can look at Leo when he's built. And only in spring. Equally silly to say he shoulda been a bull because he was looking at Taurus. And only in spring. That's arguing against facts, not from them. And ultimately, yes, the New Age throws out inconvenient facts because their purpose is not actually the promotion of some lion narrative but the actual destruction of the facts in people's minds by confusion, obfuscation, and manipulation. Raising consciousness via impotence. Graph is very tenacious, so you feel free to see if you can shake him off a mantra, but on this one I've said plenty and will hold off on slamming it further unless there's interest (this comment may already slam too much).
I did, and I thought I had your approval to do so when you said you wouldn't be likely to be the mod, but when you withdrew your approval I stopped making light of myself. I am compelled to disagree with your idea that moderating a living Scored community for 5 years is doing nothing.
The "Age of Aquarius" is New Age propaganda that uses the zodiac and impossible to confirm "ages" to date this "age of aquarius" or "age of pisces", which OP tries to promote.
Watch the documentary, their only argument is that the Sphinx looked like a lion and was pointed towards a theoretical position that has nothing to do with the constelations.
That's their only argument, and they can never prove it. I've watched the documentary, they certainly want you to believe the new age propaganda - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=the+age+of+aquarius+book&t=brave&ia=web
OP doesn't understand that he's promoting the new age movement. Don't fall into his trap.
I know exactly any trap u/Graphenium may lay, my fren. In the prior threads I debunked the data pretty heavily (searchable if you like), but in this one since he wanted it as a roundtable I laid off from being quite so critical.
I find that God always is in any symbol before the devil can corrupt it. God put the stars in place, he calls the primary ones the Mazzaroth in the AV, and that includes what became known as the 48 constellations of the zodiac. He tells Job that the stars have specific functions, specifically the belt of what we call Orion, and others. The astronomical fact that the New Age plays off of is that the vernal sunrise takes place in Aquarius (is cusping there from Pisces over the next couple hundred years, it being a general period not making it less significant); and that we had three previous eras of about 2,000 years of Taurus, then Aries, then Pisces for the same vernal sunrise. This has a match to God's stated purposes for these eras and also to indications he works in millennial eras, this being the beginning of the seventh millennium. So I redirect the New Age stuff to points like that.
It might interest you both to be refreshed that the four constellations at cardinal points, Scorpius (as a winged serpent), Leo (lion), Taurus (bull), Aquarius (waterman), correspond to tribal affiliations of the four cardinal tribes among the twelve, which also (with eagle meaning winged serpent) correspond to the vision of Ezekiel 1 and to the four gospels traditionally symbolized as four aspects of Jesus's ministry. Matthew bull means Servant, Mark lion means King, Luke man means Son of Man, John eagle means Son of God. Let's look up the other one: Num. 2 has Judah east, Reuben south, Ephraim of Joseph west, Dan north, and Gen. 49 has Reuben waterman, Judah lion, Dan serpent, and Joseph only "strength" for the bull; but Deut. 33 has Joseph bull. This means that when the congregation camped, if they used tribal banners corresponding to their corresponding blessings, they would mimic on earth the shape of the zodiac in heaven.
Interesting to me, though, the order is not exactly the same; which suggests that the correspondence is not a map but an indication of paradigms that have some flexibility. For application it appears intended that God wants us to have an understanding of four paradigmatic personality types and roles indicated by these symbols, which can be expanded to twelve when detail is needed, and that these roles also form a sequence in the order of salvation (just as Virgo plays a role in Rev. 12 and seems to start the narrative cycle): serpent for sin, man for humility, bull for service, lion for reign.
The idea that the constellations can be used narratively as paradigms is wholly consonant with Scripture. Astrologers have so warped our understanding of the narrative that we forget that God put it there in the first place and abrogate our right to reclaim the zodiac for his original purposes. (In particular, by placing creation and flood as bookmarks in the key time of Taurus, the tribulation/rapture might be indicated in this key time of the beginning of Aquarius. That part I affirm, but I've pointed out the failure of science to demonstrate the validity of any of the other dates Graph bends over backwards for. In fact, with the irregularity of his schedule, it might be argued that he is more likely to predict the present to yield a nothingburger or an extinction than it is to yield an awakening, but on the young-earth schedule it's a certainty to yield an awakening to anyone who desires. So I don't know why he sticks with the weaker and corrupting version if that's his goal.)
The other part is clearly special pleading. Two hours to say the "lion" points east. That means he does look at whatever constellation has the vernal sunrise, but it's 100% silly IMHO to backdate him six thousand years just so that he can look at Leo when he's built. And only in spring. Equally silly to say he shoulda been a bull because he was looking at Taurus. And only in spring. That's arguing against facts, not from them. And ultimately, yes, the New Age throws out inconvenient facts because their purpose is not actually the promotion of some lion narrative but the actual destruction of the facts in people's minds by confusion, obfuscation, and manipulation. Raising consciousness via impotence. Graph is very tenacious, so you feel free to see if you can shake him off a mantra, but on this one I've said plenty and will hold off on slamming it further unless there's interest (this comment may already slam too much).
u/SwampRangers used my post to promote himself as a mod to the community - https://communities.win/c/Meta/p/1ARK0LXq6i/cconspiracies-has-had-no-active-/ (1 day after I posted my original topic, and make note that he hasn't done anything of value to be a mod.)
I did, and I thought I had your approval to do so when you said you wouldn't be likely to be the mod, but when you withdrew your approval I stopped making light of myself. I am compelled to disagree with your idea that moderating a living Scored community for 5 years is doing nothing.
You did that 1 day after I wrote this post and WITHOUT MY APPROVAL.
You did that only to promote yourself using my post.