This is just a common video glitch which can be seen in many other videos of objects that move relative to the camera. Hence why nobody at the time saw it and it goes away each time the shot changes.
I believe it happens because the video encoding saves space by only recording changes between frames rather than recording each frame separately. That's why only moving objects are affected. Also I believe the encoding records when a group of pixels move across the screen without substantial changes in color rather than treating each pixel separately, which would explain why the glitches move along with the object they are on.
Sorry, for whatever reason I cannot play these videos (whenever there's a play button like that...) So I can't be sure of what you're posting...
However...
I investigated the topic and most of the videos are just frame issues. If someone moves their eye too fast, you might see both frames at one time, and that's incorrectly suggesting that there's something wrong with these people.
If reptilians really existed, they would've won the Earth through sheer force. But they don't. Because they are not real.
The evil ones are possessed by demons, you can show clear signs of possession, but they don't have reptilian eyes...
Do you want me to share with you videos on possession, so you can see that too?
PS: Download the video to your device and play it form there, it's not about the eyes, and there are many videos like that, I don't think it's a technical glitch at all
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... dude, finally a solution!!! Thank you very much! It works! I don't understand how I never tried this before but I thank you so much!!!
Now I see it - the texture on their faces, but you can see that's not real. Since they move their eyebrows and the texture follows that.
So, you put forth a lot of good points, so I will go one by one:
First, dinosaurs existed way before mamals, a self-aware reptilian race developped here on this earth is not far fetched
Two, if they existed for millions of years then it implies that they are so advanced in everything, including war techniques, but we still exist! that means they did not want to exterminate us for some reason, what could it be? are we a live-stock to them? do they need us for something? is someone preventing them from doing that? we have multiple probabilties here
True, if your first point is correct. However, you can see the documentary and prove that it isn't.
Take T-rex for example. That's an example for a big lizard with tiny arms... However, if T-rex had wings, and we know from bats that their wings are like elongated fingers covered with skin, and we know that those long fingers would be the first to rot, as they are very slim... Wouldn't you consider T-rex to be winged dragon? And their fingers ended with nails, so that's what survives after they are gone.
Would you consider that? Is there any chance that evolution theory is a joke made by a mason - Charles Darwin, who married his sister and mostly all of his children died? Perhaps we shouldn't jump on his conclusion is what I'm saying...
Please view the documentary.
Another note: it's very interesting that in the movie "They Live" reptilians lost their shield/hologram or whatever is that after destroying the broadcasting towers
That could be possessed people as well tho.
Electromagnetic waves can be used in a lot more than just wifi or televsion and other typical applications, one example that you could make at your own home is the V2K technology, you can literally make someone hear a voice just by a wave, i.e: a phone tower! a satellite.. and this is proven and public domain knowledge not classified or sci-fi tech
Well, the links you shared are very interesting. I'm not sure how I go by this, I always thought that you need a receiver inside the brain of the person... I guess I need to investigate that more...
Electromagnetic waves interact with the brain directly, remember, the body is an electrical machine, and with the right signals you can make someone hear, see, or even think! whatever you want!
I see your point, but I can't figure out how this can be done so easily without a receiver near the nerves of the brain... Probably I need more information there, but I don't exclude your point, even if I don't currently believe it. But I need proof of that.
Those are long materials consider the other link about evolution too. Leave the "case of possession" for last, but that's a good case... I couldn't find the other ones right now. The documentaries are very much worth your time.
Please take the time to view them and we can discuss this forward. Give them a chance for at least 10 minutes before you quit them, otherwise, I don't see how we can discuss them.. (I'm saying this because most users will hate me before even checking those documentaries... Just looking to explain my case with proofs in documentaries, but if they are not seen, then we are not talking on the same subject afterwards... It happens to me a lot. And I hope you know how much documentaries are worth... Isn't that why you shared your video?)
Your browser is probably outdated or have bad settings, update it or swich to another browser, and yeah, if you have an issue just tell someone, they might have the solution for you!
I'm using brave browser to never see a single ad. I would rather use your workaround than switch to another browser. Again, thank you for that! And yes, I have been saying this in posts where I can't access the video and you're literally the first person in years, who finally provided a solution. Thanks again!
I saved the documentary, I'm already researching evolution and creation and other alternatives, I do not beleive or trust any of these things, honestly no one knows how things started, evolution has holes and the creation hypothsis have them as well
Then I'm glad you saved it, it will clear a lot of those questions for you.
The problem with evolution is for example we have big empty intervals where humans made a significant jump and developped a lot out of nowhere
I would rather you just watch the documentary... There are more parts available if you like this one that go really deep into the holes in evolution. I would rather not explain them in a comment, when a perfect documentary already exist. Technically, it's a lecture but I use "documetary" broadly.
With creation, we have the problem of finding more primtive humanoids like Neaderthals, Denisovans, Cromagnons etc
There are explanations for these tho - just modified skeletons through erosion, weight, termal conditions, etc., etc. Again - the lecture is full of examples.
These are not modern humans and not apes either, they are way developped than apes, we do have thier skeletons also, why do they exist if the current humans are here since the beginning? and why they went extinct? outdated version? just like your browser? no more needed? initial prototypes?
Same reply as above. The lecture is pretty funny too, I'm sure you'll enjoy watching it.
For now I think the truth lies somehwere in between the two hypotheses of creation and evolution, I think it's a guided evolution, someone is guiding it, but it has some "automatic" proceeses to it, so it gives the illusion of the classical ecolution we all know of
Perfect! Watch the lecture with an open mind and let me know what you think.
So, whatever caused humans, it could be the cause behind other sentient races like reptilians as well, it's not about evolution or creation, I don't think this is the main point, the point is: we are not alone
Honestly, that's why I sent you those documentaries... I could explain this case for hours, but you would save both of us a lot of time, if you check those videos and THEN we discuss those topics.
But if you want my persoanl opinion about this after years of investigation,
I would really prefer your years + 3-4 hours of watching those videos that I sent you. I have a lot to say on the topics you raised, and we'll have a wonderful discussions, but these comments are getting bigger and bigger and at some point they will be unreadable...
btw reptilians are very old in folklore, they are not a modern thought, you can find stories about them with mayan and african tribes, they even have instruction on how to deal with them!
That's also in the videos that I sent... How is the devil called in the Bible - That red dragon... And how many other races are in the Bible - satyrs, for example... I will provide you on a lot of information, but you'll help me out if you watch the videos first.
Also, if you have a vision of a dragon/reptilian, how would you know if that's real or a vision? How do we know that we're awake or still dreaming? We can't make that difference really, only when we wake up we realize it...
check out the neurophone of Patrick Flangnan
Quote from the link you sent me:
"To use this technology, you place the sensors on the forehead under a headband."
Sounds like a receiver to me...
So...
But the advanced applications that can be done with this tech are fore more than just the deaf hearing.
I would really like to discuss that with you, but I currently know that they use nanotechnological receiver that is self-assembling tech that requires EM waves to work, hense the 5G towers...
Can you please check if the quote from the link you sent me and review if that's indeed a receiver? Because so far I believe it is, but I want us to review this before we move forward.
I told you my claims would take hours of long comments, while you watching the documentaries I shared freely with you that answer more than half of your questions, will drastically reduce that.
It's efficient, and I told you that many of your current questions are already answered there. If you don't want to watch videos that contain visual proofs, then can you explain why a comment would do a better job in convincing you?
Never said malnutrition btw. I meant that skulls and skeletons can be deformed due to the many years of tons of dirt, or water, being on top of them. In contrast, do you mean to tell me that what you believe is that over millions of years not a single of the neanderthal skeletal examples was never deformed due to the enormous weight over it?
In short:
My claim: hundreds of years can deform a human skull/skeleton. Rock is harder than bones. Even water can deform them through weight, or even petrify them. That's why they are not actual skulls or skeletons, but fossils.
Your claim: Millions of years cannot deform a human skull/skeleton.
I hope now my claims are well-presented rather than just void.
They're just malnourished genus Homo. They have the same interfertility and DNA barcode as Homo sapiens and should be counted as one kind with them except that von Linne was abused after his death. They went extinct just like other subspecies go extinct in favor of dominant versions. Happy to talk about it more.
There is no missing link between Pan and Homo or any other interfertile kinds. The entire fusion from the 48 of Pan is a completely undocumented narrative inference (imagination) based on evolutionary theory. The key to this is that since fine-tuning mathematically proves that the first abiogenesis is impossible in this universe, but it happened, then it's just as impossible for abiogenesis to have happened say 10,000 times, each for a different species. So both evolution and creation are equally impossible, or equally inexplicable. It's equally crazy for Homo to evolve from Pan as it is for Homo to arise from nonlife. But in creation we have a credible, coherent theory the universe is not just a closed system.
The classic link in the now-debunked 1965 "March of Progress" graphic was between Australopithecus and Homo erectus, a completely different link proposal than your site has, because scientists are constantly arguing with each other over it. All such links have been mathematically shown to involve absurd probabilities due both to the exacting science of DNA comparison and the physical features (notably the cranial size gap).
Now, as the moderator of c/Reptilians (quiet but at least u/LightBringerFlex cited your video), I'm taking your words cautiously because I see a possible path toward them; I'll need more time to be able to verbalize it in detail. But it's a basic inference to sentient cryptids in general and would require some refinement of theory to explain the human appearance and any phenomenon of glitching that is not an artifact of repeated digital compression.
whatever caused humans, it could be the cause behind other sentient races like reptilians as well ... we are not alone .... I think there are all kinds of entities out there, both material like us and "immaterial"
Good! Working on it.
One thing to keep in mind is that much of the cultural data used to support reptilians are really just about dragons, which include fire-breathing tyrannosaurs, and herbivore apatosaurs, for the most significant. The modern Icke phenomenon ("MIB" being the distraction version), tying reptilians to human form, is really just "scalies in reverse" (subcategory of furries). So the reality behind this phenomenon has a lot of ground to cover and also wise distinction to be made.
I've looked at quite a few skeleton schematics as a complete amateur, they all meet this criterion. Denisovans are interesting, like pygmies are interesting.
I'd love postings anywhere about ancient evidence of humanoid reptilians.
I've discovered that believing in divine creation means actually explaining nothing by divine creation. Rather, it means knowing that everything has an explanation, and receiving those explanations when needed, and knowing (unlike the scientists) that there is always more to the unexplained. Scientists who pretend to being close to explaining everything belie themselves about their theories always containing some unexplained element. So the theist who is frank about all science containing an unexplained element should not get heat for it. Especially when he is willing to say an explanation for anything can be found in time (which doesn't contradict there always being an unexplained remainder). Rather than guess which details you're referring to, I'll let you ask if there is something you think I'm leaving unexplained to you.
Looking forward to your thoughts, as I intended to supplement and not to oppose.
To give you an update, so far my analysis indicates maybe five very arbitrarily defined and fluid categories we can apply to evidence of cryptids.
Earth origin (archaeopteryx, Denisovan): This is when we have DNA evidence and science acknowledges the entity but there's still some difficulty about placement and interpretation.
Probable earth origin (dragon, yeti): This is when there isn't DNA evidence but the evidence still treats the entity as a relatively ordinary species that replicates on earth like others; these are distinguishable because the realms where such probable-earth creatures live is harder to explore by humans, leading to the weakness of evidence.
Alternate origin (sasquatch, chupacabra): This is when all sightings have an apparent inexplicable cover for them in the sense that the creature doesn't act natural, appears usually one at a time and only in unique incidents, and isn't tracked to a living population on earth like others are assumed to be. This phenomenon is better explained by teleportation of such a creature at occasional times and places from an unearthly source than by such a creature having an ongoing population in the wild.
Simulation (grays, reptilians): This is when the phenomenon of regularly inexplicable cover is present and the incidents also take on an unnatural experience that appears extradimensional, hypnotic, or otherwise unearthly. This is best explained not by any physical cryptid but by a simulation of a given form by a nonphysical entity that ordinarily has some other form (e.g. energy patterns that resemble UAPs).
Shapeshifting (nephilim, werewolf): This is when the being takes multiple forms, typically a known one (human) and an arcane one (reptilian). This appears to be similar to simulation as above, except that the entity is physical but still retains power to simulate the additional form. Unlike the other cases, these appear to require the concession of ordinary human rights because the entities are subject to the weaknesses of humanity, but they can also be judged independently on their actions as humans. I hesitate to say much here because there should be no slippery slope to generic disregard of humanity because some of them might be something more or less than others.
It seems there is a general pattern in nature that living beings, sentient or not, are classed into independent species or kinds that each develop from seed form during an immature phase, and therefore any being can be classed in a given species according to its origin. Interfertility is the usual mark. If this were not true then a temporal being would exist without any default species that would be regarded as a conglomeration of many or all; but no beings come into existence in record or observation with this phenomenon. So since we are asking about multiple forms it seems that an instance of a being must be classified according to the form it takes from its origin (parent(s)); and that other forms are then secondary, learned from observation of those forms and from power to manipulate one's resonance in this world (physical or not, or both) so as to reflect those forms.
I know that doesn't answer your question, it's just an attempt to begin classification of the question. This is also not to focus on sentience or nonsentience. You seem to be using category (1) as evidence of evolution, and that's an old debate where I gave the hints of an answer, in that the DNA barcode of all species within Homo is the same, so marks of "primitivity" or "development" do not disprove creation. More to the point you use it, and the origin of Pan as well (chimps), to ask about evidence of other sentient races; and it might be used for a long inferential chain, but I don't think we'll find new sentience in category (1). So I inferred the other categories based on the type of evidence we have and the likelihood of different origin methods. (2)-(3) speak of the physical only and cover most of the nonsentient cases, but can include the sentient; (4) is more where we'd put demon testimony, and (5) is more where we'd put shapeshifter testimony ("reptilian" has been used to speak of both, as well as of the chupacabra in group (3)). And in particular (3)-(5) have in common that they are not hiding in earth but that they have pathways to earth from elsewhere. (Some might put them in the volcanos and the hollow earth, but my theorizing is functionally equivalent with that when I speak of not being in the explored earth. Wherever they arise does not follow known physics, which explains why it becomes hiding rather than the trackability of groups (1)-(2).)
You allude to the possibility that the cryptid is also modifying the perceptions of others. I don't rate that option highly, but I must keep an open mind. I don't think we're modifying light for those who are fully awake and using their eyes normally, but I do think that there are powers of hypnosis that transfer imaginative forms into the place in the mind where sight is understood. But I'm not treating any of these events as imaginative. If an abductee reports an experience that is better explained as hypnotic than as physical, that doesn't teach us about form (except maybe energy form). The question is limited to experiences that indicate species of creatures that recur in other experiences, not about hapax visions.
This is just a common video glitch which can be seen in many other videos of objects that move relative to the camera. Hence why nobody at the time saw it and it goes away each time the shot changes.
I believe it happens because the video encoding saves space by only recording changes between frames rather than recording each frame separately. That's why only moving objects are affected. Also I believe the encoding records when a group of pixels move across the screen without substantial changes in color rather than treating each pixel separately, which would explain why the glitches move along with the object they are on.
Thanks 👍
Ever see the one where the power went out at a Russian nightclub and several people had glowing eyes?
https://youtu.be/KjwpcqfEwtY?si=WK67HZyMfN6ISszi
https://unidentifiedphenomena.com/topics/they-live-among-us-glowing-eyes/
Sorry, for whatever reason I cannot play these videos (whenever there's a play button like that...) So I can't be sure of what you're posting...
However...
I investigated the topic and most of the videos are just frame issues. If someone moves their eye too fast, you might see both frames at one time, and that's incorrectly suggesting that there's something wrong with these people.
If reptilians really existed, they would've won the Earth through sheer force. But they don't. Because they are not real.
The evil ones are possessed by demons, you can show clear signs of possession, but they don't have reptilian eyes...
Do you want me to share with you videos on possession, so you can see that too?
PS: Download the video to your device and play it form there, it's not about the eyes, and there are many videos like that, I don't think it's a technical glitch at all
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... dude, finally a solution!!! Thank you very much! It works! I don't understand how I never tried this before but I thank you so much!!!
Now I see it - the texture on their faces, but you can see that's not real. Since they move their eyebrows and the texture follows that.
So, you put forth a lot of good points, so I will go one by one:
Actually, evolution is easily disproven - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8d1Y6PUEmc4 (This is not a joke documentary, give it a try)
True, if your first point is correct. However, you can see the documentary and prove that it isn't.
Take T-rex for example. That's an example for a big lizard with tiny arms... However, if T-rex had wings, and we know from bats that their wings are like elongated fingers covered with skin, and we know that those long fingers would be the first to rot, as they are very slim... Wouldn't you consider T-rex to be winged dragon? And their fingers ended with nails, so that's what survives after they are gone.
Would you consider that? Is there any chance that evolution theory is a joke made by a mason - Charles Darwin, who married his sister and mostly all of his children died? Perhaps we shouldn't jump on his conclusion is what I'm saying...
Please view the documentary.
That could be possessed people as well tho.
Well, the links you shared are very interesting. I'm not sure how I go by this, I always thought that you need a receiver inside the brain of the person... I guess I need to investigate that more...
I see your point, but I can't figure out how this can be done so easily without a receiver near the nerves of the brain... Probably I need more information there, but I don't exclude your point, even if I don't currently believe it. But I need proof of that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlu0KU-YERg - case of possession.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ovZC_aXQlY - Demons Masquerading As Dead Relatives
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5hIfoZwavw - Demon Magicians Exposed
Those are long materials consider the other link about evolution too. Leave the "case of possession" for last, but that's a good case... I couldn't find the other ones right now. The documentaries are very much worth your time.
Please take the time to view them and we can discuss this forward. Give them a chance for at least 10 minutes before you quit them, otherwise, I don't see how we can discuss them.. (I'm saying this because most users will hate me before even checking those documentaries... Just looking to explain my case with proofs in documentaries, but if they are not seen, then we are not talking on the same subject afterwards... It happens to me a lot. And I hope you know how much documentaries are worth... Isn't that why you shared your video?)
I try to understand that EM waves going directly to the inner ear without a receiver, but it's not clear to me from this link - https://patents.google.com/patent/US6470214B1
Can you help me out?
I'm using brave browser to never see a single ad. I would rather use your workaround than switch to another browser. Again, thank you for that! And yes, I have been saying this in posts where I can't access the video and you're literally the first person in years, who finally provided a solution. Thanks again!
Then I'm glad you saved it, it will clear a lot of those questions for you.
I would rather you just watch the documentary... There are more parts available if you like this one that go really deep into the holes in evolution. I would rather not explain them in a comment, when a perfect documentary already exist. Technically, it's a lecture but I use "documetary" broadly.
There are explanations for these tho - just modified skeletons through erosion, weight, termal conditions, etc., etc. Again - the lecture is full of examples.
Same reply as above. The lecture is pretty funny too, I'm sure you'll enjoy watching it.
Perfect! Watch the lecture with an open mind and let me know what you think.
Honestly, that's why I sent you those documentaries... I could explain this case for hours, but you would save both of us a lot of time, if you check those videos and THEN we discuss those topics.
I would really prefer your years + 3-4 hours of watching those videos that I sent you. I have a lot to say on the topics you raised, and we'll have a wonderful discussions, but these comments are getting bigger and bigger and at some point they will be unreadable...
That's also in the videos that I sent... How is the devil called in the Bible - That red dragon... And how many other races are in the Bible - satyrs, for example... I will provide you on a lot of information, but you'll help me out if you watch the videos first.
Also, if you have a vision of a dragon/reptilian, how would you know if that's real or a vision? How do we know that we're awake or still dreaming? We can't make that difference really, only when we wake up we realize it...
Quote from the link you sent me:
Sounds like a receiver to me...
So...
I would really like to discuss that with you, but I currently know that they use nanotechnological receiver that is self-assembling tech that requires EM waves to work, hense the 5G towers...
Can you please check if the quote from the link you sent me and review if that's indeed a receiver? Because so far I believe it is, but I want us to review this before we move forward.
I told you my claims would take hours of long comments, while you watching the documentaries I shared freely with you that answer more than half of your questions, will drastically reduce that.
It's efficient, and I told you that many of your current questions are already answered there. If you don't want to watch videos that contain visual proofs, then can you explain why a comment would do a better job in convincing you?
Never said malnutrition btw. I meant that skulls and skeletons can be deformed due to the many years of tons of dirt, or water, being on top of them. In contrast, do you mean to tell me that what you believe is that over millions of years not a single of the neanderthal skeletal examples was never deformed due to the enormous weight over it?
In short:
My claim: hundreds of years can deform a human skull/skeleton. Rock is harder than bones. Even water can deform them through weight, or even petrify them. That's why they are not actual skulls or skeletons, but fossils.
Your claim: Millions of years cannot deform a human skull/skeleton.
I hope now my claims are well-presented rather than just void.
Good question!
They're just malnourished genus Homo. They have the same interfertility and DNA barcode as Homo sapiens and should be counted as one kind with them except that von Linne was abused after his death. They went extinct just like other subspecies go extinct in favor of dominant versions. Happy to talk about it more.
There is no missing link between Pan and Homo or any other interfertile kinds. The entire fusion from the 48 of Pan is a completely undocumented narrative inference (imagination) based on evolutionary theory. The key to this is that since fine-tuning mathematically proves that the first abiogenesis is impossible in this universe, but it happened, then it's just as impossible for abiogenesis to have happened say 10,000 times, each for a different species. So both evolution and creation are equally impossible, or equally inexplicable. It's equally crazy for Homo to evolve from Pan as it is for Homo to arise from nonlife. But in creation we have a credible, coherent theory the universe is not just a closed system.
The classic link in the now-debunked 1965 "March of Progress" graphic was between Australopithecus and Homo erectus, a completely different link proposal than your site has, because scientists are constantly arguing with each other over it. All such links have been mathematically shown to involve absurd probabilities due both to the exacting science of DNA comparison and the physical features (notably the cranial size gap).
Now, as the moderator of c/Reptilians (quiet but at least u/LightBringerFlex cited your video), I'm taking your words cautiously because I see a possible path toward them; I'll need more time to be able to verbalize it in detail. But it's a basic inference to sentient cryptids in general and would require some refinement of theory to explain the human appearance and any phenomenon of glitching that is not an artifact of repeated digital compression.
Good! Working on it.
One thing to keep in mind is that much of the cultural data used to support reptilians are really just about dragons, which include fire-breathing tyrannosaurs, and herbivore apatosaurs, for the most significant. The modern Icke phenomenon ("MIB" being the distraction version), tying reptilians to human form, is really just "scalies in reverse" (subcategory of furries). So the reality behind this phenomenon has a lot of ground to cover and also wise distinction to be made.
I've looked at quite a few skeleton schematics as a complete amateur, they all meet this criterion. Denisovans are interesting, like pygmies are interesting.
I'd love postings anywhere about ancient evidence of humanoid reptilians.
I've discovered that believing in divine creation means actually explaining nothing by divine creation. Rather, it means knowing that everything has an explanation, and receiving those explanations when needed, and knowing (unlike the scientists) that there is always more to the unexplained. Scientists who pretend to being close to explaining everything belie themselves about their theories always containing some unexplained element. So the theist who is frank about all science containing an unexplained element should not get heat for it. Especially when he is willing to say an explanation for anything can be found in time (which doesn't contradict there always being an unexplained remainder). Rather than guess which details you're referring to, I'll let you ask if there is something you think I'm leaving unexplained to you.
Looking forward to your thoughts, as I intended to supplement and not to oppose.
To give you an update, so far my analysis indicates maybe five very arbitrarily defined and fluid categories we can apply to evidence of cryptids.
Earth origin (archaeopteryx, Denisovan): This is when we have DNA evidence and science acknowledges the entity but there's still some difficulty about placement and interpretation.
Probable earth origin (dragon, yeti): This is when there isn't DNA evidence but the evidence still treats the entity as a relatively ordinary species that replicates on earth like others; these are distinguishable because the realms where such probable-earth creatures live is harder to explore by humans, leading to the weakness of evidence.
Alternate origin (sasquatch, chupacabra): This is when all sightings have an apparent inexplicable cover for them in the sense that the creature doesn't act natural, appears usually one at a time and only in unique incidents, and isn't tracked to a living population on earth like others are assumed to be. This phenomenon is better explained by teleportation of such a creature at occasional times and places from an unearthly source than by such a creature having an ongoing population in the wild.
Simulation (grays, reptilians): This is when the phenomenon of regularly inexplicable cover is present and the incidents also take on an unnatural experience that appears extradimensional, hypnotic, or otherwise unearthly. This is best explained not by any physical cryptid but by a simulation of a given form by a nonphysical entity that ordinarily has some other form (e.g. energy patterns that resemble UAPs).
Shapeshifting (nephilim, werewolf): This is when the being takes multiple forms, typically a known one (human) and an arcane one (reptilian). This appears to be similar to simulation as above, except that the entity is physical but still retains power to simulate the additional form. Unlike the other cases, these appear to require the concession of ordinary human rights because the entities are subject to the weaknesses of humanity, but they can also be judged independently on their actions as humans. I hesitate to say much here because there should be no slippery slope to generic disregard of humanity because some of them might be something more or less than others.
It seems there is a general pattern in nature that living beings, sentient or not, are classed into independent species or kinds that each develop from seed form during an immature phase, and therefore any being can be classed in a given species according to its origin. Interfertility is the usual mark. If this were not true then a temporal being would exist without any default species that would be regarded as a conglomeration of many or all; but no beings come into existence in record or observation with this phenomenon. So since we are asking about multiple forms it seems that an instance of a being must be classified according to the form it takes from its origin (parent(s)); and that other forms are then secondary, learned from observation of those forms and from power to manipulate one's resonance in this world (physical or not, or both) so as to reflect those forms.
I know that doesn't answer your question, it's just an attempt to begin classification of the question. This is also not to focus on sentience or nonsentience. You seem to be using category (1) as evidence of evolution, and that's an old debate where I gave the hints of an answer, in that the DNA barcode of all species within Homo is the same, so marks of "primitivity" or "development" do not disprove creation. More to the point you use it, and the origin of Pan as well (chimps), to ask about evidence of other sentient races; and it might be used for a long inferential chain, but I don't think we'll find new sentience in category (1). So I inferred the other categories based on the type of evidence we have and the likelihood of different origin methods. (2)-(3) speak of the physical only and cover most of the nonsentient cases, but can include the sentient; (4) is more where we'd put demon testimony, and (5) is more where we'd put shapeshifter testimony ("reptilian" has been used to speak of both, as well as of the chupacabra in group (3)). And in particular (3)-(5) have in common that they are not hiding in earth but that they have pathways to earth from elsewhere. (Some might put them in the volcanos and the hollow earth, but my theorizing is functionally equivalent with that when I speak of not being in the explored earth. Wherever they arise does not follow known physics, which explains why it becomes hiding rather than the trackability of groups (1)-(2).)
You allude to the possibility that the cryptid is also modifying the perceptions of others. I don't rate that option highly, but I must keep an open mind. I don't think we're modifying light for those who are fully awake and using their eyes normally, but I do think that there are powers of hypnosis that transfer imaginative forms into the place in the mind where sight is understood. But I'm not treating any of these events as imaginative. If an abductee reports an experience that is better explained as hypnotic than as physical, that doesn't teach us about form (except maybe energy form). The question is limited to experiences that indicate species of creatures that recur in other experiences, not about hapax visions.
Reeeeee everyone's a nazi!!! 🤣
White lives matter