He doesn't define the framing that "kabbalah becomes digital life".
If you know Aronofsky's movie π you would probably get a better window. Everything in the cosmos is mathematically determined. Kabbalah seeks core congruences between numbers and all things. Healthy application of the principle is when Christians say seven is the number of perfection, or when Matthew implies fourteen is the number of King David. It can easily be used unhealthily. I anticipate that "digital life" means the recognition that our lives have mathematical determinism (that doesn't contradict freewill) and that AI is an attempt to model that. And, when unexplained, it is effectively magic. It would probably need Messianic intervention to help us get it right.
Would you like some help vibrating kabbaloth, creating glamim, manifesting kosmoi, or the like?
Everything in the cosmos is mathematically determined
a) Cosmo-gony (cosmetics upon generation) + math-e-matic (mowing in magic) + deter-mined (fear mining)
b) Only within everything can each thing come into being...cosmogony; mathematics and determination are applied to an artificial sum of things.
c) If uni (one) verse (to turn); then what could one turn to? What could God turn to? What could energy turn to? What could cause turn to? What could whole turn to? What could all turn to?
What if there's only one line (inception towards death) for each one (life) within? What does turning imply in that situation? Where can life turn to while in the process of dying?
seven is the number of perfection
Aka s-even (split even), as in she (split he); female (feminine male) or woman (womb man)...an internal transformation of flow (inception towards death) into form (life) aka even (balance) splitting into each odd (choice).
determinism (that doesn't contradict freewill)
Consenting to a suggested -ism implies ones free will of choice binding self to another...being bound contradicts being free.
AI is an attempt
Tempting who to do what? Free will of choice to bind self by consenting to a suggestion?
when unexplained, it is effectively magic
If effect implies cause, then ex-plain implies expressed effect within plain cause.
UN- implies the suggested negation aka reversal (turning) of cause towards effect into "affecting effect to ignore cause" while turning on itself (logic) and onto each other (reason).
Affecting (suggestion) effect (perception) to ignore cause (perceivable)...how isn't that self explanatory?
manifesting kosmoi
If kosmos aka uni-verse implies singular, then how could one be manifolded into a plural kosmoi?
a) It was before anyone within can suggest to one another what it is.
b) Finite implies those directed; in-finite implies within those directed. The one directing implies all...not finite or infinite.
c) Finite or infinite implies a measurement taken...direction implies given to those directed. Those who take ignore given.
Maybe...
...implies may/magh (to be able, have power) of a being, not whats directing the state of being. Only within energy can there be power, as in...energy enables power.
for one...for all
Forward implies from all through each one within. Reasoning aka for one vs for another or for all vs not for all tempts one to ignore that.
Reason implies a circle shaped within linear "forward" direction.
a) Putting reason (yes vs no) before implication (if/then) puts the shape before the line it's being shaped within...an inversion.
If/then aren't turned against one another like yes vs no...if cause/then effect; if all/then one; if action/then reaction; if process/then potential etc.
b) If reason implies a hammer, then how does hammering another down helps one to grow?
c) "The nail that sticks out gets hammered down"...it's about synthesis preventing analysis. A society cannot allow free will of choice...any reason will be used to destroy whoever questions what holds society together.
Each member of a society holds a consensus together, while ignoring that nature sets each being apart from one another, hence giving free will of choice. This consensus is where the hammer of reason is used to fight tooth and nail against any implied contradiction to the consensus.
A jew doesn't fight for the consensus...gentiles are fighting (reasoning) against one another, while destroying themselves and the social consensus in the process of nature, while each jew injects artifice into the conflicts from both sides to fuel the flames.
It implies a fortress
Fort/fortis - "strength" within a process is build by resisting (need) the temptation (want) to hold onto. Choosing to hold onto a side within reason, while fighting the other...weakens strength.
Your beliefs
a) Be (being) lief/leubh (to care) implies burdening self, while ignoring that nature relieves each being within.
c) Your implies taking possession, while ignoring that process (inception toward death) relieves potential (life) of burdening possession.
d) The origin of YOU (phonetic jew) implies one taking possession over self as I AM (je suit; jesus)...that implies the jew-dah vs jesus conflict of betrayal aka the inversion of self among another.
a piece of paper
Being implies a piece of all...paper/papy (father) tempts one to ignore that aka "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
Writing words on paper aka crafting spells implies in the name of the father...
First I’ve heard of it… these “shorts” videos suck (this one especially), I know, forgive me lol
But it does kind of sound intriguing … potentially explaining the obsession with numbers, gematria, geometry, etc
Has anyone seen the full episode of tuckers show here, and does the guy expand on this? And/or have any source on this other than the silly guy in the 10second long video?
I have only one link to the demonic ultra religion, which is Kabbalah, link to digital life.
First of all, Kabbalah is basically veiled Satanism. I don't mean to say that Kabbalah is digital in any way. Rather, it leads to the digital outcome we have today.
Secondly, Kabbalah is the most powerful of Satanistic religions - the only one that gives the best fruits to Satanists. And every Satanist eventually gets to the Kabbalah to become powerful.
Thirdly... Read this verse from the Bible:
And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. - Revelation 13:15
Keep in mind that the Beast, the Anti-christ, and the false messiah are the 3 major figures thrown in the fire, never this "image of the beast". So, you can conclude that this image is a construct.
Many consider the "image of the beast" to be a robot, but how can a robot speak without AI?
My theory is that this "image of the beast" is a giant computer, or the origin of AI. It's a construct that "causes" things to happen. It can "cause" robots to attack people, etc. Hense, the relationship with digital age.
P.S.: Notice that I don't directly connect the Kabbalah to digital life, but use it in reverse as Kabbalah is the most effective, and the one taking effect is digital life, so most probably Kabbalah is the most effective cause for digital life. This is an assumption, not a proof. But a very solid assumption, in my opinion.
Some interesting ideas… and now you that mention them, im reminded of a conspiracy I came across years ago, the “Black Cube of Saturn”, which actually did also tie together satanism (aka saturnism), and a.i. / digital consciousnesses (along with jewish teffilfin, the muslim Kabaa, the Christian cross, and the hexagon at Saturn’s pole)
Come to think of it, it’s probably infinitely easier for a disembodied spirit to posses a soulless vessel (i.e. “robot”) than to overpower a human soul and wrestle control of their body
Digit (numeral below 10) + al (all)...all implies one for each one within; zero implies ones ignorance of all for one another, which establishes the link aka the digital "log-in" of ana (throughout) logos (logic/reason) life.
interpretation of
Interpret/interpretari aka inter (within) + pre/per (forward; through) implies all perceivable forwarding, while moving through each ones perception within.
Getting ones interpretation from any suggestion by another tempts one to ignore that.
the obsession with numbers, gematria, geometry
a) Obsession aka ob (against) sed (to sit)...a jew suggests numbers to shape a sed-i-ment (settled within mind) aka a consensus within the mind of gentiles, who by consenting are choosing a side against one another.
Upvote vs downvote implies "to sit against" aka obsession aka 1 vs 1 conflict about numbers.
b) Gematria aka natural generation (ge) + artificial metric (matria)...any measurement taken ignores generation given.
Being implies unit (life) of length (inception towards death)...measuring the length (dying) corrupts the unit (living). Life cannot perceive ones inception or death...others suggest it in historical or futuristic terms of fiction for ones consent to measure.
c) Geometric aka geomancy - "art of divination by means of signs derived from the earth"...divination implies nature dividing into being; artifice implies being holding onto signs derived by each other.
Only one aspect of natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) tempts one to hold onto...land aka earth aka matter aka solid; not spirit (air) or liquid (water) which one ignores when holding onto solid.
Perceivable implies liquid; perception implies solid; perceivable moving through perception implies spirit...suggested materialism tempts one to ignore liquid (motion) and spirit (momentum) for solid (matter).
a) Actual (all acting) + salvation aka sol (whole) ation (action) implies all action upon each ones reaction within aka whole acting upon each partial reaction within.
b) Actual salvation (perceivable moving through perception) or fictional salvation (suggested held by consent).
c) The trick about salvation...saving suggested within memory, while ignoring perceivable moving through.
kabbalah
Cabbala/qibbel - "to receive" implying ones perception receiving all perceivable, also kabba+alah (cube of allah) aka kaaba/kaʽba al.
Allah implies "law of all" aka natural law; cube implies "cueing being" aka all perceivable giving each ones perception the "cu" to "be".
Furthermore...ones perception within all perceivable implies in-between left/right + up/down + front/back aka from within a cube aka a cubical (all cuing being). A cue implies intimation - "action of making known".
digital becoming AI
Coming into being implies a setting apart of perceivable and perception; coming together implies analog consent to digital suggestion of artificial in-tel-ligo (within tale of bondage).
book of revelation
Aka to bind what's revealed with whatever is written into it. Nature reveals by action; a book binds ones reaction to whatever is written in-between covers.
Words are shaped by LETTERS aka by one LETTING another shape words...words keep letters confined.
“shorts” suck
Suggesting less sucks ones consent into wanting more...
Sound moves through air, yes? If you truly want to describe sound, go open up a recording tool, make sounds at a microphone, and post pictures of the sine wave that form on the screen.
If you want to describe sound, tell us the physics. Word analyzing is NOT the way to do that.
And what benefit do you believe this activity will do, hmmm???
a) Sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" implies motion separating into momentum (land, air, water) for each matter within.
b) Sound moves linear...yes vs no implies circular conflict about words, shaped within linear sound.
If you truly want to describe sound
a) Sound implies need for each instrument within...instrument wanting (true) vs not wanting (false) from one another ignores sound needed.
b) If implies then...linear progression without conflict. The use of "truly" and "want" tempt the shaping of circular confinement (logic) against one another (reason).
c) Describe implies the division (de) of any written word and the sound it's written within.
Scribe/scriba - "teacher of jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe This is why gentiles describing anything to one another with words will always mislead those who ignore sound.
go open up a recording tool, make sounds at a microphone, and post pictures of
a) Go/gan - "to depart" implies whole (sound) dividing (de) into partial (instrument)...not the noise an instrument makes to tempt one another to go anywhere.
b) Record implies responding (re) to a rope, string, twist (cord) aka to bondage by free will of choice, which is why any recording made by an instrument ignores sound moving.
A jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to "record" it by consent within mind/memory, which distracts gentiles from perceivable inspiration moving through each ones mind, hence animating each being of sound mind.
c) Microphone implies a distortion (micro vs marco) of sound (phone)
d) Picture implies a captured moment aka the inversion of momentum (inception towards death) which matter (life) cannot capture, since it moves.
Recording; distorting and capturing represent tools for mind-control, and each requires ones consent to record,distort and capture what another suggests.
sine wave that form
Sine/sinus - "curve"....form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies a sine wave aka a temporary growth during ongoing loss aka sound curving instruments from one another within a spectrum.
Consenting to me showing you a curve on a screen inverts SINUS into US SIN(ing) aka a sin/synchronization of instruments.
If you want
Reason (want vs not want) contradicts implication (if/then), which is needed for one to think straight.
tell us the physics
a) The EL in tell implies "all", which one ignores when telling tales to one another.
Us (plural synthesis) prevents ones (singular analysis) growth, while suggested THE-ism tempts ones consent (ones choice) under the authority of another (chosen one).
Word analyzing is NOT the way to do that.
Only within a way (natural sound) can a word (articulation of sound) be shaped...the separation of natural into artificial implies an analytical process. Holding onto the shape, while ignoring the process, implies synthetic possession within the analytical process of a potential being.
Analyzing "not" implies a separation of everything into nothing...are you able to further analyze that?
what benefit do you believe
a) To believe implies holding onto, which detriments a being (life) during a process (inception towards death).
b) Bene (in the right way) + fit (be the right shape) implies nature fitting being within (life) right way (inception towards death)...not any benefits a being extracts (consent) by coercion (suggestion) from one another.
this activity will do
a) Nature implies the action that does, each being within implies ones will to react.
b) Analyzing the synthesis of words within sound implies a reaction aka a regeneration of instrument (mind structured within) sound.
It clears ones mind to analyze what others synthesize aka cleaning up the artificial possession during the natural process within self...NOT for others.
One cannot let go of what another willingly chooses to hold onto aka the words others don't see any value in analyzing, while synthesizing with them within a fallen world of lies and deception.
From the christian perspective...God (perceivable sound) or Satan (suggested word) based on each ones free will of choice.
Logos (suggested word) > logic (circular thinking) > reason (turning against one another) represents a synthesis...not Gods (all sound) analysis (each instrument) aka self discernment.
He doesn't define the framing that "kabbalah becomes digital life".
If you know Aronofsky's movie π you would probably get a better window. Everything in the cosmos is mathematically determined. Kabbalah seeks core congruences between numbers and all things. Healthy application of the principle is when Christians say seven is the number of perfection, or when Matthew implies fourteen is the number of King David. It can easily be used unhealthily. I anticipate that "digital life" means the recognition that our lives have mathematical determinism (that doesn't contradict freewill) and that AI is an attempt to model that. And, when unexplained, it is effectively magic. It would probably need Messianic intervention to help us get it right.
Would you like some help vibrating kabbaloth, creating glamim, manifesting kosmoi, or the like?
a) Cosmo-gony (cosmetics upon generation) + math-e-matic (mowing in magic) + deter-mined (fear mining)
b) Only within everything can each thing come into being...cosmogony; mathematics and determination are applied to an artificial sum of things.
c) If uni (one) verse (to turn); then what could one turn to? What could God turn to? What could energy turn to? What could cause turn to? What could whole turn to? What could all turn to?
What if there's only one line (inception towards death) for each one (life) within? What does turning imply in that situation? Where can life turn to while in the process of dying?
Aka s-even (split even), as in she (split he); female (feminine male) or woman (womb man)...an internal transformation of flow (inception towards death) into form (life) aka even (balance) splitting into each odd (choice).
Consenting to a suggested -ism implies ones free will of choice binding self to another...being bound contradicts being free.
Tempting who to do what? Free will of choice to bind self by consenting to a suggestion?
If effect implies cause, then ex-plain implies expressed effect within plain cause.
UN- implies the suggested negation aka reversal (turning) of cause towards effect into "affecting effect to ignore cause" while turning on itself (logic) and onto each other (reason).
Affecting (suggestion) effect (perception) to ignore cause (perceivable)...how isn't that self explanatory?
If kosmos aka uni-verse implies singular, then how could one be manifolded into a plural kosmoi?
Edit: a sleight of hand for turning... https://genius.com/The-beach-boys-i-get-around-lyrics
https://img.gvid.tv/i/3CdYYHde.png (notice he tips his head)
Inception, not "at inception"; towards death, not "at death"? Process of dying, not "death"?
Bond suggests "Where can life turn"; so does freedom.
Kosmoi (multiversal) follow sufficient perception of kosmos (universal).
Sound moves in one direction...rearranging words within doesn't change that.
Is that one direction finite or infinite?
Maybe directed finity for one implies undirected infinity for all.
a) It was before anyone within can suggest to one another what it is.
b) Finite implies those directed; in-finite implies within those directed. The one directing implies all...not finite or infinite.
c) Finite or infinite implies a measurement taken...direction implies given to those directed. Those who take ignore given.
...implies may/magh (to be able, have power) of a being, not whats directing the state of being. Only within energy can there be power, as in...energy enables power.
Forward implies from all through each one within. Reasoning aka for one vs for another or for all vs not for all tempts one to ignore that.
Reason implies a circle shaped within linear "forward" direction.
No. It implies a hammer. It implies a fortress. Your beliefs imply a burnt cupcake. Your beliefs imply a piece of paper.
a) Putting reason (yes vs no) before implication (if/then) puts the shape before the line it's being shaped within...an inversion.
If/then aren't turned against one another like yes vs no...if cause/then effect; if all/then one; if action/then reaction; if process/then potential etc.
b) If reason implies a hammer, then how does hammering another down helps one to grow?
c) "The nail that sticks out gets hammered down"...it's about synthesis preventing analysis. A society cannot allow free will of choice...any reason will be used to destroy whoever questions what holds society together.
Each member of a society holds a consensus together, while ignoring that nature sets each being apart from one another, hence giving free will of choice. This consensus is where the hammer of reason is used to fight tooth and nail against any implied contradiction to the consensus.
A jew doesn't fight for the consensus...gentiles are fighting (reasoning) against one another, while destroying themselves and the social consensus in the process of nature, while each jew injects artifice into the conflicts from both sides to fuel the flames.
Fort/fortis - "strength" within a process is build by resisting (need) the temptation (want) to hold onto. Choosing to hold onto a side within reason, while fighting the other...weakens strength.
a) Be (being) lief/leubh (to care) implies burdening self, while ignoring that nature relieves each being within.
c) Your implies taking possession, while ignoring that process (inception toward death) relieves potential (life) of burdening possession.
d) The origin of YOU (phonetic jew) implies one taking possession over self as I AM (je suit; jesus)...that implies the jew-dah vs jesus conflict of betrayal aka the inversion of self among another.
Being implies a piece of all...paper/papy (father) tempts one to ignore that aka "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
Writing words on paper aka crafting spells implies in the name of the father...
First I’ve heard of it… these “shorts” videos suck (this one especially), I know, forgive me lol
But it does kind of sound intriguing … potentially explaining the obsession with numbers, gematria, geometry, etc
Has anyone seen the full episode of tuckers show here, and does the guy expand on this? And/or have any source on this other than the silly guy in the 10second long video?
I have only one link to the demonic ultra religion, which is Kabbalah, link to digital life.
First of all, Kabbalah is basically veiled Satanism. I don't mean to say that Kabbalah is digital in any way. Rather, it leads to the digital outcome we have today.
Secondly, Kabbalah is the most powerful of Satanistic religions - the only one that gives the best fruits to Satanists. And every Satanist eventually gets to the Kabbalah to become powerful.
Thirdly... Read this verse from the Bible:
Keep in mind that the Beast, the Anti-christ, and the false messiah are the 3 major figures thrown in the fire, never this "image of the beast". So, you can conclude that this image is a construct.
Many consider the "image of the beast" to be a robot, but how can a robot speak without AI?
My theory is that this "image of the beast" is a giant computer, or the origin of AI. It's a construct that "causes" things to happen. It can "cause" robots to attack people, etc. Hense, the relationship with digital age.
The News-Benders 1968 (1 year before big event) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYAke_z3RVU (30-min short movie that is worth the watch, it's important for my point)
P.S.: Notice that I don't directly connect the Kabbalah to digital life, but use it in reverse as Kabbalah is the most effective, and the one taking effect is digital life, so most probably Kabbalah is the most effective cause for digital life. This is an assumption, not a proof. But a very solid assumption, in my opinion.
I would appreciate your thoughts on the matter.
Some interesting ideas… and now you that mention them, im reminded of a conspiracy I came across years ago, the “Black Cube of Saturn”, which actually did also tie together satanism (aka saturnism), and a.i. / digital consciousnesses (along with jewish teffilfin, the muslim Kabaa, the Christian cross, and the hexagon at Saturn’s pole)
Come to think of it, it’s probably infinitely easier for a disembodied spirit to posses a soulless vessel (i.e. “robot”) than to overpower a human soul and wrestle control of their body
Indeed, perhaps a thorough research into this would yield any true answers. Curious topic tho.
Digit (numeral below 10) + al (all)...all implies one for each one within; zero implies ones ignorance of all for one another, which establishes the link aka the digital "log-in" of ana (throughout) logos (logic/reason) life.
Interpret/interpretari aka inter (within) + pre/per (forward; through) implies all perceivable forwarding, while moving through each ones perception within.
Getting ones interpretation from any suggestion by another tempts one to ignore that.
a) Obsession aka ob (against) sed (to sit)...a jew suggests numbers to shape a sed-i-ment (settled within mind) aka a consensus within the mind of gentiles, who by consenting are choosing a side against one another.
Upvote vs downvote implies "to sit against" aka obsession aka 1 vs 1 conflict about numbers.
b) Gematria aka natural generation (ge) + artificial metric (matria)...any measurement taken ignores generation given.
Being implies unit (life) of length (inception towards death)...measuring the length (dying) corrupts the unit (living). Life cannot perceive ones inception or death...others suggest it in historical or futuristic terms of fiction for ones consent to measure.
c) Geometric aka geomancy - "art of divination by means of signs derived from the earth"...divination implies nature dividing into being; artifice implies being holding onto signs derived by each other.
Only one aspect of natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) tempts one to hold onto...land aka earth aka matter aka solid; not spirit (air) or liquid (water) which one ignores when holding onto solid.
Perceivable implies liquid; perception implies solid; perceivable moving through perception implies spirit...suggested materialism tempts one to ignore liquid (motion) and spirit (momentum) for solid (matter).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_czibJylWs
a) Actual (all acting) + salvation aka sol (whole) ation (action) implies all action upon each ones reaction within aka whole acting upon each partial reaction within.
b) Actual salvation (perceivable moving through perception) or fictional salvation (suggested held by consent).
c) The trick about salvation...saving suggested within memory, while ignoring perceivable moving through.
Cabbala/qibbel - "to receive" implying ones perception receiving all perceivable, also kabba+alah (cube of allah) aka kaaba/kaʽba al.
Allah implies "law of all" aka natural law; cube implies "cueing being" aka all perceivable giving each ones perception the "cu" to "be".
Furthermore...ones perception within all perceivable implies in-between left/right + up/down + front/back aka from within a cube aka a cubical (all cuing being). A cue implies intimation - "action of making known".
Coming into being implies a setting apart of perceivable and perception; coming together implies analog consent to digital suggestion of artificial in-tel-ligo (within tale of bondage).
Aka to bind what's revealed with whatever is written into it. Nature reveals by action; a book binds ones reaction to whatever is written in-between covers.
Words are shaped by LETTERS aka by one LETTING another shape words...words keep letters confined.
Suggesting less sucks ones consent into wanting more...
Sound moves through air, yes? If you truly want to describe sound, go open up a recording tool, make sounds at a microphone, and post pictures of the sine wave that form on the screen.
If you want to describe sound, tell us the physics. Word analyzing is NOT the way to do that.
And what benefit do you believe this activity will do, hmmm???
a) Sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" implies motion separating into momentum (land, air, water) for each matter within.
b) Sound moves linear...yes vs no implies circular conflict about words, shaped within linear sound.
a) Sound implies need for each instrument within...instrument wanting (true) vs not wanting (false) from one another ignores sound needed.
b) If implies then...linear progression without conflict. The use of "truly" and "want" tempt the shaping of circular confinement (logic) against one another (reason).
c) Describe implies the division (de) of any written word and the sound it's written within.
Scribe/scriba - "teacher of jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe This is why gentiles describing anything to one another with words will always mislead those who ignore sound.
a) Go/gan - "to depart" implies whole (sound) dividing (de) into partial (instrument)...not the noise an instrument makes to tempt one another to go anywhere.
b) Record implies responding (re) to a rope, string, twist (cord) aka to bondage by free will of choice, which is why any recording made by an instrument ignores sound moving.
A jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to "record" it by consent within mind/memory, which distracts gentiles from perceivable inspiration moving through each ones mind, hence animating each being of sound mind.
c) Microphone implies a distortion (micro vs marco) of sound (phone)
d) Picture implies a captured moment aka the inversion of momentum (inception towards death) which matter (life) cannot capture, since it moves.
Recording; distorting and capturing represent tools for mind-control, and each requires ones consent to record,distort and capture what another suggests.
Sine/sinus - "curve"....form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies a sine wave aka a temporary growth during ongoing loss aka sound curving instruments from one another within a spectrum.
Consenting to me showing you a curve on a screen inverts SINUS into US SIN(ing) aka a sin/synchronization of instruments.
Reason (want vs not want) contradicts implication (if/then), which is needed for one to think straight.
a) The EL in tell implies "all", which one ignores when telling tales to one another.
b) Physic/bheue - "to be, exist, grow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/physic
Us (plural synthesis) prevents ones (singular analysis) growth, while suggested THE-ism tempts ones consent (ones choice) under the authority of another (chosen one).
Only within a way (natural sound) can a word (articulation of sound) be shaped...the separation of natural into artificial implies an analytical process. Holding onto the shape, while ignoring the process, implies synthetic possession within the analytical process of a potential being.
Analyzing "not" implies a separation of everything into nothing...are you able to further analyze that?
a) To believe implies holding onto, which detriments a being (life) during a process (inception towards death).
b) Bene (in the right way) + fit (be the right shape) implies nature fitting being within (life) right way (inception towards death)...not any benefits a being extracts (consent) by coercion (suggestion) from one another.
a) Nature implies the action that does, each being within implies ones will to react.
b) Analyzing the synthesis of words within sound implies a reaction aka a regeneration of instrument (mind structured within) sound.
It clears ones mind to analyze what others synthesize aka cleaning up the artificial possession during the natural process within self...NOT for others.
One cannot let go of what another willingly chooses to hold onto aka the words others don't see any value in analyzing, while synthesizing with them within a fallen world of lies and deception.
From the christian perspective...God (perceivable sound) or Satan (suggested word) based on each ones free will of choice.
Logos (suggested word) > logic (circular thinking) > reason (turning against one another) represents a synthesis...not Gods (all sound) analysis (each instrument) aka self discernment.