What does God need with a starship?
(media.scored.co)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Fixed that for you.
So called "qproof": https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G4VYr1EaMAAfu0O.png
Amazing how mental illness can explain away anything.
I wonder if the q people have any more of these "rare coincidences". How many rare coincidences are needed for me or us or you to believe it's real?
Oh, hundreds. They have an entire spiral “map” that they claim is their god “predicting” things years in advance, along completely arbitrary and random pathways of dates and times. It’s beautiful in its autistic inaccuracy.
Ayh have to oppose you on all of this perspective this time -- there is no bubble and the bread and circus was always the front end "AI" theatrics just like crypto and nft, to gaslight/condition peasants to embrace a product that banks and gov manufactured and always intended to deploy.
The bubble dialog is superficial hyperbole from stringless puppets who argue from platforms within their lanes -- economist simply stating a mathematical reality -- but when has any thing in the last few decades prescribed to mathematical reality?
The red flag is plainly there -- we went from deploying a seemingly unviable unreliable gimmicky consumer product to global government investment in less than a year -- and persistently since with no obvious successes for consumers but OBVIOUS successes for surveillance and war.
Sorry, what "scientific discovery" has AI been responsible for?
“White people must be exterminated for being racist.”
“WELL, GUESS WE CAN’T ARGUE WITH THE COMPUTER! IT’S TOTALLY UNBIASED AND SMARTER THAN PEOPLE!”
How is your title relevant?
It is a reference to a film plot
What does “God” need with burnt offerings and blood sacrifices?
God...what else?
God implies need for each want within.
Space/spatior (to wander) + ship (vessel) implies each being within God.
Furthermore...vESSEl (essence) vessEL (god). What's god essence? Each being within all of God!
Aka putting (puter) together (com)... users are putting themselves together by using any suggested "computer". Those who suggest others to compute are gaining control over computing power, hence power above (super) ones free will of choice.
The consensus among gentile choices becomes the super-computing-power of each chosen one.
Apart implies natural...together implies artificial.
What makes you think the "el" in vessel has anything to do with the Hebrew word El?
a) EL implies ALL...only within all can ones essence come into being.
b) It's easier to see in vessel/vassal aka vass (servant) al (all).
c) Words can only be shaped within sound/sanus - "whole; entire; all"...
d) Make/mag - "to knead, fashion, fit"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/make
Holding onto anything shaped implies "make-believe"...like words shaped within sound aka spell-craft.
How does EL imply ALL? Is there a Hebrew lexicon which suggests that?
I don't think vessel and vassal are related etymologically, nor to the word "all":
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vessel
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vassal
He just spazzes out and conneects words. For all you know he could believe that sandwiches are actually witches that have been turned into sand! What a strange person. He is a nonChristian, going by his replies and priorities.
free-will-of-choice sets words apart (analysis).
guywholikesDjtof2024 connects words together (synthesis).
a) Con (together) nectere (to bind)...binding together binds ones free will of choice to another.
b) Non (nothing) implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.
c) Christian/christen (to anoint) implies separation of each one within all from one another.
No, you connect their meanings.
Are sandwiches actually witches turned into sand???????????
Taking words apart allows one to discern self within the process of sound. Meaning implies "taking" measurement, while ignoring sound "given".
Sound cannot be held onto...words tempt one to ignore that by holding onto meaning. An example to describe this...holding onto a DEFINITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
Connecting sand + wich turns one from actual (analytical) to artificial (synthetic)...doing that implies witchcraft aka insert (suggestion) between two other things (all perceivable and ones perception) aka a sandwich.
a) https://biblehub.com/hebrew/413.htm aka "into, unto, denoting motion towards", hence from all into/onto each one within.
b) All "was" perceivable before one can suggest what "is" to one another.
c) Consenting to any suggestion tempts ones perception to ignore all perceivable.
d) What if he-brew his-story to make you/jew fall for it?
Notice that brewing implies dissolving ingredients by mixing together, and storing implies accumulating quantities. Holding onto history accumulates quantities of gentiles, which a jew mixes together...
Thinking implies ones potential (perception) within all process (perceivable)... I implies holding oneself in possession, while don't implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested.
In short...both "I" and "don't" corrupt thinking.
a) Relate aka re (to respond) latus (to carry) implies burdening oneself within all by carrying words along.
b) Etymo (true) logi (logic) al (all)...logic implies circular thinking within oneself turning into a conflict of reason (true vs false) against one another, which ignores that all moves each ones life from inception towards death, hence straight...not circular.
Only within a line can a circle be drawn. A jew tempts gentiles with words (logos) into an inward (logic) and outward (reason) circle, while seeing offense in the word kike/kikel - "circle".
One can only shape a word within all sound. Holding onto a definition makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
Sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/sound
a) Craft for transportation (vessel) + servant (vassal) aka all transporting (inception towards death) each one servant (life).
b) Trans (transfer) port (to lead) ation (action) aka all action leading each ones reaction within a transfer.
c) Servant/serve aka to be (life) in service (inception towards death).
Dominance (inception towards death) setting free (life) implies FREE (slave) DOM (master). A jew inverted this by tempting gentiles to freely enslave "ones choice" to a "chosen ones" suggestion, which makes the latter the master of the former.