What does God need with a starship?
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
How does EL imply ALL? Is there a Hebrew lexicon which suggests that?
I don't think vessel and vassal are related etymologically, nor to the word "all":
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vessel
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vassal
He just spazzes out and conneects words. For all you know he could believe that sandwiches are actually witches that have been turned into sand! What a strange person. He is a nonChristian, going by his replies and priorities.
free-will-of-choice sets words apart (analysis).
guywholikesDjtof2024 connects words together (synthesis).
a) Con (together) nectere (to bind)...binding together binds ones free will of choice to another.
b) Non (nothing) implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.
c) Christian/christen (to anoint) implies separation of each one within all from one another.
No, you connect their meanings.
Are sandwiches actually witches turned into sand???????????
Taking words apart allows one to discern self within the process of sound. Meaning implies "taking" measurement, while ignoring sound "given".
Sound cannot be held onto...words tempt one to ignore that by holding onto meaning. An example to describe this...holding onto a DEFINITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
Connecting sand + wich turns one from actual (analytical) to artificial (synthetic)...doing that implies witchcraft aka insert (suggestion) between two other things (all perceivable and ones perception) aka a sandwich.
a) https://biblehub.com/hebrew/413.htm aka "into, unto, denoting motion towards", hence from all into/onto each one within.
b) All "was" perceivable before one can suggest what "is" to one another.
c) Consenting to any suggestion tempts ones perception to ignore all perceivable.
d) What if he-brew his-story to make you/jew fall for it?
Notice that brewing implies dissolving ingredients by mixing together, and storing implies accumulating quantities. Holding onto history accumulates quantities of gentiles, which a jew mixes together...
Thinking implies ones potential (perception) within all process (perceivable)... I implies holding oneself in possession, while don't implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested.
In short...both "I" and "don't" corrupt thinking.
a) Relate aka re (to respond) latus (to carry) implies burdening oneself within all by carrying words along.
b) Etymo (true) logi (logic) al (all)...logic implies circular thinking within oneself turning into a conflict of reason (true vs false) against one another, which ignores that all moves each ones life from inception towards death, hence straight...not circular.
Only within a line can a circle be drawn. A jew tempts gentiles with words (logos) into an inward (logic) and outward (reason) circle, while seeing offense in the word kike/kikel - "circle".
One can only shape a word within all sound. Holding onto a definition makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
Sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/sound
a) Craft for transportation (vessel) + servant (vassal) aka all transporting (inception towards death) each one servant (life).
b) Trans (transfer) port (to lead) ation (action) aka all action leading each ones reaction within a transfer.
c) Servant/serve aka to be (life) in service (inception towards death).
Dominance (inception towards death) setting free (life) implies FREE (slave) DOM (master). A jew inverted this by tempting gentiles to freely enslave "ones choice" to a "chosen ones" suggestion, which makes the latter the master of the former.