When you have a huge amount of energy, you could create matter from it.
Matter creation happens as creation of particle-antiparticle pair when very high energy photon or other particle interact with matter.
Let's simplify things and say we have power to produce photons with energy of 2GeV. This is enough to create proton-antiproton and electron-positron pairs. Proton with electron is an hydrogen atom, Antiproton with positron is antihydrogen atom. Also, we could get neutron-antineutron pairs too, and create more complex atoms.
So, with enough energy we could produce useful atoms. Then we coud use it as classic fuel to fry eggs or combine it with another atoms, say oxygen and get water, or say carbon and get whole variety of hydrocarbons. Creating and combinng different atoms we could get any molecules of chemical substances we could wish. Combining molecules in certain order we get real things we need.
Well, to create things in that way we need enormous amount of energy. But that's not the problem, because for each particle we create, we get an antiparticle as byproduct. And combining antimatter with any matter we get annigilation that produce same enormous energy we spent to create matter we need.
The whole cycle of making goods from anything will look like
- energy -> matter + antimatter
- matter -> goods we need
- antimatter + anything ( garbage or, say, soil ) -> energy
here we need only to compensate energy losses, and resolving technical question of efficiency it could be relatively moderate amount.
If a person have a powerful energy source, then this person could have anything he need for life, regardless of environment, up to space and other planets.
Then, the whole concept of money, profit and so political and economic power, which are foundation of modern world become null and void. You don't need money if you could make anything you want by yourself. Moreover, you don't need government, economy, trade and all that stuff. You don't even need protection from any third-party, because nobody need to stole anything from you, and you could have enough firepower to stop some insane idiot who didn't yet get that it is a bad idea to attack a person who could have a power of a nuclear bomb in his pocket. So the question of mentally ill idiots who can't live without bothering others will resolve itself quickly.
Not hard to imagine that there is no place for modern elites in such world. They will become just regular people without any power and fame, because they have no any merits. And that is why elites afraid of any real techological progress, and trying hard to divert human ingenuity into different shitty directions posed as "progress" like "AI", EV, "green energy", economy, social networking and so on.
Destruction of modern clown world order should begin with development of personal independent power source with a power output up to few megawatt. This is the only way I see to defeat clown world order. Everything else will just end with nothing. Elites will easily direct any efforts to change something politically or economically into vapour, as they always do. Individual power source of high power will destroy the foundation of elite power over people.
Wrong marxist materialist assumption. The reason behind inequality, greed and evil is not material needs that have not been met and can't be mended by material means. The reason is the fallen nature of humanity and of this world - money exists because man loves power and wants to dominate over other men, not because of pure pragmatic reason like you buying stuff with it. Even if everyone's needs are completely satisfied you'd still have crime because sin is not rational or pragmatic - people will commit crime just for the sake of it (you're a Russian, right - haven't you red Dostoyevsky?)
You can't cure the world of evil by producing more stuff, this is retarded utopianism and history has shown time and time again the root of evil is spiritual and not material. Adam and Eve literally lived in paradise and had everything and they still rebelled and fell out of communion with God because their free will allowed them to be deceived.
No political or economical system can bring salvation - salvation is only through Christ and His Church.
You imagined one exaggerated assumption about my views and just made opposite exaggerated assumption to argue.
There are multiple reasons behind things you listed. Some are material and some are spiritual. We are not able to remove spiritual ones, since they are in our nature, but that does not mean we couldn't eliminate material ones, instead of accepting them as something natural, or even using them for our selfish reasons.
You also mistakingly assume "communism" as a "paradise on Earth" which is impossible for obvious reasons and this assumption was pushed by ideologists for purpose. Absolutely not, "StarTrek communism" is in no way a "paradise on Earth", just a society where all material needs are satisfied.
That does not mean that people will turn into vegetables. Some will definitely do that, but better they be vegetables than politicians or thieves. Most people will still have many reasons to live an active and creative life, for purely spiritual reasons. IDK, if you ever feel that thirst to do something when vacation is long enough, but that's how most people manifest spiritual attraction to the creation.
Exactly. That's why money should be destroyed. Humans will still love power and domination, but will have to achieve them with developing own merits, including spiritual ones, not by theft, coinflipping and usury as they do now.
Of course they will. Again, real communism is in no way "paradise on Earth", and does not solve any spiritual challenges humans face constantly. But it will give an axe not only to Raskolnikov, but also to rentier old lady too.
I hope you support "Second amendment", aren't you? Then Colt did a very important thing - he practically implemented "Second amendment", just in one very narrow area. Thing I'm talking about is just same "Second amendment" but not just for guns, but for everything.
When everyone have a gun, crime goes down. Not because owning a gun change something in spiritual sphere of human being, but because criminal lose part of their power over others. However, power that is used against people by those who have a criminal mind and a thrist of domination is not only guns, but also energy, food, home, family and so on. Money is just a tool used to make stealing of all above from people easier. If you have a need to exchange something, then there will be money as a mean of exchange. If there will be money, there will be usury, cheating, theft and so on. The only way to avoid this completely is to eliminate a need for exchnage. If you can make anything you need by yourself, there is no need to exchange anything, so no need for money, and so those who want power over you they don't deserve will have no way to obtain it.
Again, you are more marxist than me. :) Or at least under heavy marxist propaganda, regardless of sign. The society where all material needs are satisfied is in no way will be a "Paradise on Earth" as marxists insisting and those opposing them repeating. It is not about curing the world at all, it is about eliminating all obstacles for the world to cure. The decision will be on each and every person then, clearly and without any excuses.
Exactly. That's why achieving a practical communism is important. When you have everything material you need, then what will be your excuse to not search for salvation in Christ? Thing I'm talking about will put the question of salvation in it's essence without any way to find any excuse. It will clearly show who is who, and what side he stand.
Remember, Christ fed thousands with few loafs and fishes. And He did it at least twice. Guess why He resorted to that local practical communism? Definitely not for virtue signalling or whatever selfish shit. If God did that, then it is obviously have a lot of sense.
Says the guy who posts about how wonderful communism would be if done right. Communism is talmudic in origin fyi. There's a reason why every zionist was a commie and why the jewish headed French and Bolshevik revolutions where also communist.
Communism is antithetical to Christianity both in theory and in practice. Money is not intrinsically evil or bad and neither is having property. Christ teaches us that what's sinful is the love of money/avarice and of holding on to worldly things. Your line of reasoning is similar to the Russian gnostic skoptsy who chopped off their wieners because they believed sexuality to be inherently bad.
PS: The peak of irony here is that Star Trek, as all sci fi, is socialist and illuminist propaganda itself (promoting scientific internationalism guised as "interplanetarism") and it definitely worked on you.
That's what I'm talking about. You have literal communism inside your family. I hope you didn't charge your kids for food and then force them to earn money to pay for next one. If you have a healthy and happy family, that means you are literally doing communism right. Congratulations.
Marxist version communism definitely is. Just like modern version of capitalism. There is nothing Christian in both. Both are a tool for jews to opress people and extract wealth from them.
You stuck in the swamp of ideological and political interpretation of terms and phenomenons. You just reproduce settings that was pushed into your mind by media, regardless of side and sign and all that stuff. Marx said something, and you, for completely unknown reason believe this disgusting jew. Some faggots and perverts named themselves democrats and you believe them they are an essence of democracy. And so on. Don't fall to that traps, they are build to limit your worldview, to prevent you from looking into undesireable for them direction.
That does not mean that you don't need worldy things, like globalists trying to convince us. There is nothing bad in owning wordly things. And everything is bad about idolizing them.
Isn't that the same thing that big capitalists with their BigPharma and BigMedia pushing on us for decades? All that LGBTXYZ+ shit is exactly same as chopping dicks for the sake of some virtue.
On the opposite, I state that when you are in eternal cycle of moneymaking to satisfy your needs, you are not free enough to think about your soul. Regular people need a very strong will to put a soul above the need to feed kids and have a roofing above their families. Moreover, doing their inevitable everyday jobs, more than half of regular people participate in other's sins directly or indirectly.
You posit a fake dialectic between communism and capitalism, which reminds me of the fake and gay left/right divide created by the talmudic freemasons. What's funny is that the future global technocracy will be a synthesis of communism and capitalism and even Marx argued that capitalism is a needed stepping stone to communism. Both represent a humanistic liberal secular and talmudic system that opposes God.
Ok, let's hear your version of communism that is good and not at odds with Christianity. Summarize it in short.
People have more free time today and live a much more secure, comfortable and easy lives compared to the past. Meanwhile, godlesness, idol worship and degeneracy is at an all time high in countries that were very much Christian and people attended Church daily. Your argument runs contrary to historical evidence. If you read proverbs, you'd see that work is what keeps man away from sinful thoughts and deeds and that sin's best friend is boredom and idleness.
But sure, chasing after money and running the rat race is not good either.
I don't care about your own attitude to the terms we have. I just don't have term better than communism to describe society where everybody could produce anything he need for life by himself. But it is definitely can't be named capitalism, socialism, fascism or somehow else.
Something like that. Marx's version of communism impossible without developed capitalism according to his own writings. However, he wasn't smart enough to predict global technocracy based on digital surveillance and merging his versions communism and capitalism. De-facto, soviet socialism was corporate capitalism where state was corporation, and all corporation are purely socialist inside.
But that does not mean that there could not be other versions of communism and capitalism, based on completely different principles.
Like in old soviet definition - "from each by abilities, for each according to the needs" Just without all that common property and common work using common means of production bullshit in marxist version. Same scheme, another principle. Just like when Jesus fed thousands with few loafs and fishes.
You are mistaken about free time, being right about everything else. People have much less free time, than before. In the past, most people was peasants, and peasants job is seasonal. Yes, they had periods of hard work, but at least winter was mostly free time. Few of modern people could allow three months vacations.
Moreover, current level of technology allows earning more that enough wealth to live a week in only two or three days. This is "fixed" by employers, permanent inflation, taxes and financial crisises to force you work more to earn a decent level of living.
Well, this could be kind of cultural differences, but here boredom is an absence of interesting occupation. Most people can't stand idling more than few days. It's extremely boring and mindblowing. Basically it is a torture, to do nothing. That's why I don't see any problem in absence of a need to work hard to earn somenting to survive. There always some occupation could be found. If you need to be forced to work to keep you from sinful thoughts, then something is wrong with your brains.
This is not a just system and no one would feel obliged to put in hard work so that some lazy bum could get the same benefits. I'd much rather have the Christian charity model where it is one's duty to help those less fortunate or in need. Don't need no communism for that.
I'm aware but peasants still had way less leisure time and didn't live to get retirement and do jack shit all day. Times were rough and death, war and starvation were common occurance. You had to fight for your existence and natural selection worked full force.
In comparison, most people today have 4-6 hours of free time during the day. In the degenerate west people have it so easy, that they can literally live in their own made up reality and pretend to be the opposite sex and even get medical help for that. In the past mental illness meant death, now they run parades. Not to mention how much easier everything is made through technology, transportation and the internet. You can practically exist without leaving your room and all your basic needs will be met.
You realize that the majority of people, if given UBI and no incentive to work will indulge in the vices and become hedonistic degenerates, right? To put it bluntly, they will goon all thay long and order door dash (much like they did during the plandemic psy op which was a beta test for what's coming). Have you heard of moustopia?
I always laugh at the soy-fi nerds who were sold visions of a highly advanced future technocracy (Brave new world style) where everyone has all their needs met and is engaged with pursuing studying, creating, making art and other high brow or innocuous activities. Those people are absolutely naive about human nature and psychology. This illuminist propaganda originated way back in the Enlightenment and it is getting more ridiculous by each passing year since then.
You don't need to work hard if you have a replicator. Just like lazy bum don't need your work to get benefits because he have replicator too. Anybody is free to occupy himself with whatever occupation he like and able to do, and get all he need regardless.
I doubt that. This 4-6 hours they don't work or sleep spent mostly to do home job - buy food, cook it, play with children and all that stuff. This is not free time. It is just another job, may be more pleasant and important than paid one, but still a necessary job. Free time is when you don't need to do anything for others. Today it is a rare treasure.
I doubt about majority. But such people definitely exist. So what? If their UBI will be produced by replicator and not by your labour, then what's the problem?
You are too pessimistic about human nature and psychology to the same extent.
Try to combine their view and your own. Say, 50/50. I'm more optimistic and estimate no more than 20% of vegetables. Like they are now. Just that vegetables will be on their own, thanks to tech and will not steal yout time and labour.
Also you miss a huge part of human activity that could not be covered by any replicators. You still have to make family, grow and educate your children, grow real food and not because you can't make it, but because it is in human nature, and so on.
Again, the society where all material needs are covered by tech in no way will be a paradise, it will still be a society with good and evil and a fight between them, just a different one, where people are free from material needs yoke and have more than enough truly free time to choose their path. There will be other virtues and merits. Some will become vegetables, some will not. Those who will not become vegetables will move humanity forward.
With current system we stuck in the deadend where elites have power to control nearly everything and dictate their terms for us. This is possible only because they have tools to do that - money and power. To defeat this elites completely and forever we have to destroy their main tools - money and power. Only then we will have a chance to break out from deadend without future where we stuck.
“Communism can work in a society with perfect matter transmutation that also ignores the problem of waste heat!”
True. Thankfully, the laws of physics exist.
Lol, he just proved communism only works in a fake universe, not ours. It could also work if everyone was sinless, but unfortunately Adam and Eve sinned so everyone is stuck with a sin nature.
But God has given His Son for our salvation, defeating death and restoring our fallen nature (by assuming it and lifting it up), so that we can become gods (lowercase) and live forever in His Heavenly Kingdom.
Heaven is open for each one of us if only we are in communion with Christ in His Church and follow His testament. What's the point of Star Trek communism if it doesn't help people know and love God? Maybe we need to struggle and be wanting, and that suffering will bring us closer to Him?
Did Jesus say pragmatism, having things and being well off will get you to heaven or was it the opposite? He taught that slaves should obey their masters and people should obey the law and their leaders under fear of death because all authority is given by God. So much for liberal masonic pseudo-christianity's equality and liberty. God is literally the king of this world and the world, his monarchy, has a hierarchical structure. Communism fights against this divine order and is satanic.
a) There can be only one law...natural law for each being within. Energy; nature; cause; all; whole; God etc. implies singularity ...not plurality.
b) Transmutation of matter implies the transfer of matter within motion...matter implies the formed flaw (living) within the flowing perfection (dying) of motion.
A jew suggests the laws of physics to invert this...a body cannot rest, since matter can only form a body during motion. A body cannot be equal, since motion separates each body of matter into a different position from one another. Two bodies cannot exist within one motion...the separation of each unit of matter does not imply more than one motion.
It's the goyim mind that can be tricked to "rest", to "equate", and to "count"...
Yes, and that's the only way. That's the point.
Marx with his opuses about his pseudo-communism was just one of many jews, who are purposedly diverted and still diverting development of society in the most harmful ways. Like that globalists idiocy about "sustainability", that actually could be achieved not by rationing energy and everything for people along with limiting population, as they push, but only when all people will personally own powerful energy sources.
Waste heat could be converted to energy too. And that's not a problem for a society that developed a "perfect matter transmutation". We do that even today en masse, routinely.
Even laws of physics we allowed to know, say that this is possible theoretically and well-replicateable experiments prove the correctness of necessary theories practically.
You have communism right in your family. Real and working version. Not some shit thinked out by jews, but natural system of relations between family members. However, it can't be scaled out of family.
That schtick is just like those people who claim that all animals are transitional forms and thus "proof of evolution". That absolutely every single change in genes is "evolution".
If you don't like communism in your family, then why don't you implement capitalism in it? There is no problem to do that, just insert money in all your family relations and set the price for everything you do to each other. Go for it, then tell us how you like it.
Families are not goverments nor economic systems. Words have meanings. You are doing to "communism" and "capitalism" what the dems did to "bigot" and "nazzi".
They are social systems. Social systems that perfectly existing without government and economic relations inside. They are solid proof that social system could be stable and productive without using money and oppression.
If you have another terms to describe social relations between people, I'm all ears.
This won't do a thing. The enemy will just monopolize and hog the Super Energy Source.
You can't monopolize such things. Like you can't monopolize knowledge of fire. That is why modern science and engineering get financing for anyything except things that could lead to creation of "Super Energy Source".
Of course it can be monopolized. Who is controlling nuclear power plants, random people like you and I? Of course not!
NPP is designed to not be personal source of power. Intentionally.
However, personal nuclear sources of power is possible and real. Examples are betavoltaics and RITEGs.
Ok. But such tech is so far off in the future, and gives off barely any usable energy. Also, health hazards and compatibility issues abound. What's it cost to make em? Material requirements? Technical expertise? You quickly see how the theory is untenable.
Yes. But that is not an excuse to prevent research in the areas that could be used in distant future to develop such technology. Every technology we use today have a long chain of previous developments that made our technology possible.
In 60s weak 1mW red HeNe laser cost thousands and was a laboratory equipment that perceived like SciFi or magic. Today 10mW red semiconductor laser cost cents and is a toy.
In normal world, useful scientific discovery becomes part of everyday reality relatively fast, it is a question of engineering and using known technologies to make it cheaper, safer, easier to handle.
However, in modern world some fundamental scientific discoveries. like nuclear fusion reactions, which could be much more effective than fission ones, forced into a trap of endless building of overpriced designs or raw scam projects. Something like "We pay you money for not building something working".
There are many very interesting and very promising fields in physics that just didn't get necessary financing or declared "weird" or "unconventional", like Casimir cavity phenomenon, Nimtz FTL, Stewart–Tolman effect and so on.
Look at things that percieved like dangerous magic in the past, but today are juat things we don't even notice. Power sources are not exception. There is enough technological and engineering knwoledge to make even nuclear fission power source compact, easily serviceable and safe. Aforementioned RITEGs with a constant power of 1-10kW and lifetime of decades was mass produced by thousands for powering distant locations, expeditions and such. Thousands of them are simply lost. But there was no any dangerous accidents with them. Something that could be stretched as one is a case when some junkies found one RITEG and in hope to get some copper or whatever thing to sell, spent few days sawing outer shell of fuel element and finally got some non-letal, but harmful radiation dose. There are many ways to do something stupid with things we safely use daily and die.
Not my position.
Which consumes power. Generating it is a WHOLE DIFFERENT ANIMAL.
How big are they? I'm thinking of a little battery thing you can carry around. You must be thinking of three-story-house size reactors.
Typically they have a size of night table for up to 1 kW power source. Basically, it is a few kg of nuclear fuel (or nuclear waste), far below critical mass, enclosed in thick monolitic lead shield covered by stainless steel to stop radiation and keep nuclear fuel safe. This cylinder or ball just heats to around 100°C due to the fission in its core and it is surrounded by thermoelectric elements that produce electricity from the temperature difference between core and environment.
Thing is heavy, but not large at all.
Lifetime is up to 50 years. With time, power output lowers slowly, as fuel burn out and core temperature lowers.
They are definitely not power sources I'm talking about, due to limited lifetime and need to replace exhausted core, but are examples of small, long-lasting and effective nuclear power sources that could be used individually, unlike NPPs.
Tell you what. Have you heard that Einstein and particle theory is a hoax to throw our entire civilization off?
That's why the shitheads control science, education, technology, etc?
Then, try to imagine that most everything you've been taught about matter is bullshit.
Good luck
Einshtein is a jewish scammer. "Particle theory" is a working and proven model of how our world works. You use multiple things based on what you call "Particle theory" routinely, 24/7.
Mixing, say, Washington Post articles and lathe machining textbook in one sentence makes you a troll.
That's what you say but surprisingly It's not actually a working model. It's amazing and hard to believe but it's true. It's more like a half working model and just the core components are stripped from it so you will never really understand how things work.
I'm a regular here actually I'm not a troll just pointing out that you put a lot of belief and things that normal people also believe in and it's totally acceptable and unconsequential because it doesn't matter I mean you don't matter neither do I it's just nice to know the truth that particle theory and even organic chemistry are riddled with flaws
Then, there obviously should be another theory, or important addition to the current theory that could be checked experimentally to find out is there missing parts or not.
Such additions and theories generated constantly, but none of them was proven practically, not even talking about usefullness. Mostly, it is just theorists playing with math to get grants and fame, nothing more. Math is not a science, just a language to describe reality. And as in any other language you could easily talk bullshit in math, which is syntactically and grammatically correct, but that have nothing to do with how things really are. The fact that you could use math to describe something real, is in no way mean that if you write something in math it have to be real. Einstein (and those behind him), meanwhile, cheated with exactly that logical fallacy to push his idiotic speed limit, and other shit into science. He, and his supporters insisted that if math jugglery gives something, than it sould be for real.
You are right, that modern "particle theory" is not complete, but this does not mean that this incompleteness make the whole theory wrong. Things that described and predicted by "particle theory" agree well with observations, and proved by endless real-world applications. Need to go further to complete this theory, does not discard anything that already work.
All my speculations about creating matter are deep within well checked and practically proven area of "particle theory", not at some edge of incomleteness.
Developing "particle theory" further, or even creating new theory will change nothing in my speculations, because practice will continue to give same results, regardless of theory behind them.
You don't need to go to organic chemistry, even chemical processes in concrete, known for millenia, is still a mistery. This does not mean that concrete is impossible.
a) Motion implies the flowing state of energy; matter the solid state of energy.
b) Energy using motion to generate matter implies internal separation...not an amounting.
c) Huge amount represents a thinking error based on mosaic law aka the sum of all things put together...piece by piece...into a mosaic.
One cannot have a huge amount of energy...one can only be one part within all of energy. Few trick many together to amass a huge amount of willing slaves for effortless consumption of ignored energy.
a) The "will easily directed" represents many following an elite few willingly.
b) Energy implies change...vapor implies change from solid into fluid. Few suggest many to ignore fluid for solid, which energy ALWAYS changes from solid matter back into fluid motion.
It's the suggestion of "political" and "economical" which tempts one to hold onto an artificial solid, while ignoring natural fluid.
In nature there exists neither a political system where one represents another, nor any economic value to hold onto. Why? Because nature moves each one within apart from one another, which establish a) self representation by free will of choice, and b) solid evaluation of liquid value.