It's looking like almost certainly a shot down from the right back side of Charlie. Some people are saying bush shooter, others that he could be hiding in a building. All plausible.
At this point there is no reasonable doubt this was anything other than a secret society hit.
Secret society, government, deep state, Mossad, FBI, whatever you want to call it, they are all in on it.
Secret society? No way, it took 33 hours manhunt to catch the guy, maybe they catch him on the 33rd floor of a building after killing another person who was 33 years old.
Right back side would mean the bullet passing through the spine without deflecting or blowing chunks of bone out the front. If there was a 2nd shooter, they'd most likely be be front left or directly behind.
Look I'm so fucking sick of this Kirk garbino, but one thing that I did notice was the fan under his seat and the drones in the air, even that video of the light twinkling on that guys cellphone...
It was the drones and the fan directly under his ass was the target the drone aimed for, bullet came from above, they took the fan/target. Blood is consistent with from above also. Like, you know .DIRECTLY above
Probably nobody even noticed the tiny bullet hole in that Nazi "Prove me Wrong" tarp.
Did the Nazis ever use "prove me wrong" for anything ever? Serious question.
I mean, no?
Also, that way, it's true "Israel" didn't kill him, but Mossad was on the trigger though.
And as we all know, so many steps between remote control triggered weapon and the person pulling it....?
Why WAS there a small portable fan under his seat?
The fact that modern phones exist, does not negate the fact that cell phone guns do. No it doesn't matter that this theory was wrong. As so is your 'logic'.
How about the fact that cellphone guns are about the size of an old Nokia brick? The theory wasn't just wrong, it was retarded on multiple counts. Have you ever even fired a handgun?
I'll take that as a no. You've never fired a gun, you've never even handled a gun, but apparently watching Hollywood misrepresent how guns work makes you an expert.
Thank you for following up with this. It's much clearer now.
Just FYI, you're trash at researching.
I literally saw a better video in 9gag's comment section... While some of you think you're researchers...
Pathetic as usual.
It's looking like almost certainly a shot down from the right back side of Charlie. Some people are saying bush shooter, others that he could be hiding in a building. All plausible.
At this point there is no reasonable doubt this was anything other than a secret society hit.
Secret society, government, deep state, Mossad, FBI, whatever you want to call it, they are all in on it.
Secret society? No way, it took 33 hours manhunt to catch the guy, maybe they catch him on the 33rd floor of a building after killing another person who was 33 years old.
Right back side would mean the bullet passing through the spine without deflecting or blowing chunks of bone out the front. If there was a 2nd shooter, they'd most likely be be front left or directly behind.
Downward angle, hits spine and brain stem, deflects out a little towards the front.
Though now some people are arguing it was an Israeli IED device attached under the shirt. Could well be. Either way we know who did it.
Look I'm so fucking sick of this Kirk garbino, but one thing that I did notice was the fan under his seat and the drones in the air, even that video of the light twinkling on that guys cellphone...
It was the drones and the fan directly under his ass was the target the drone aimed for, bullet came from above, they took the fan/target. Blood is consistent with from above also. Like, you know .DIRECTLY above
Probably nobody even noticed the tiny bullet hole in that Nazi "Prove me Wrong" tarp.
Did the Nazis ever use "prove me wrong" for anything ever? Serious question.
I mean, no?
Also, that way, it's true "Israel" didn't kill him, but Mossad was on the trigger though. And as we all know, so many steps between remote control triggered weapon and the person pulling it....?
Why WAS there a small portable fan under his seat?
I can't really see how this angle debunks it.
Dude isn't even looking at his hands, let alone at Charlie.
Yes. Also, modern phones are way too thin to contain a gun.
The fact that modern phones exist, does not negate the fact that cell phone guns do. No it doesn't matter that this theory was wrong. As so is your 'logic'.
How about the fact that cellphone guns are about the size of an old Nokia brick? The theory wasn't just wrong, it was retarded on multiple counts. Have you ever even fired a handgun?
You are a fucking retard.
I'll take that as a no. You've never fired a gun, you've never even handled a gun, but apparently watching Hollywood misrepresent how guns work makes you an expert.
The earlier video is mud, here we see him with his hands on his chest, and nothing in his hands. Not a recoil action.