Many are complaining that guys don't approach them anymore. They don't flirt with them or ask them out.
This is because the point of feminism is to make women so unattractive that no man wants them. They convince women to become ugly by claiming that kind of behavior is empowering.
Here are the key points they push:
-
They want women to have tattoos and piercings everywhere to look trashy. Men don't like trashy women. Men like feminine, angelic women.
-
They don't want women to cook or clean. Cooking and cleaning has been historically big with women because innately men know our job is to protect and serve and women know their job is to inspire men. With a woman's inspiration, the man is able to protect and serve even better. This creates a power couple who live in a happy relationship. No man wants to come home from a hard day of work to a messy house and no food. That makes him feel unappreciated and goes against historic tradition. The tradition is actually beneficial for the couple. Without it, the man underperforms which harms both sexes. Good food is inspiring. A clean house is inspiring. There are many other ways to inspire.
-
They want women to have a tough, manly attitude. Men don't like manly attitudes. Men like feminine, angelic attitudes. Women are naturally in a better place in the mental world. Men are more in a better place in the external world making men fierce in ways. Men don't want fierce women. Men want angelic, sweet, feminine women. If men wanted fierce women, they would be gay.
-
They want women to abandon the children in day care so that the Gov can manipulate them there. Men want women to stay home and raise their children in a healthy environment. They are willing to work 8 hours a day for the family but no man wants his wife in some job where other men can flirt with her while the kids get brainwashed in daycare by Gov agents.
This issue hasn't effected all countries. Many foreign countries still have women in them. Everyone is different. Some play their role well, some play it horribly bad.
The one thing for sure is that the more of a feminist a woman is, the more unlikely she will ever date or marry a man because the feminist ideal is completely the opposite of what men life.
But that was the goal from the beginning when the Nazi Rockafeller family created this psyop to separate man and woman to destabilize society. Now they are trying to manipulate men to dress like women but luckily not so many men are falling for it.
i reminded a catholic woman that she voted for kamala harris and she was seething angry. LOL
I showed her a picture of Kamala hugging Satanyahoo and cackling alongside that goblin jew. That made her even more mad. haha
Then she tried to talk politics with me about Trump being the top goy and i told her that i don't discuss politics with women. Whether white woman or black woman or catholic woman or jew woman or atheist woman your politics boil down to high shrill voice "I want the government to kill my baby for free! It's my riiiiiiight!"
Then she got even more angry and i laughed and exited while mumbling something about repealing the 19th amendment.
Why would she be mad? The Vatican's position on judaism is that jews shouldn't be converted because there is a dual covenant in place. This is a form of dispensationalism. Her Pope is a judaizer basically, and she must submit to his teachings with docility.
It's laughable how Catholics don't know their own faith.
Most catholics don't like to actually study the bible or discuss scripture and its meaning in detail. I think it's more a popular club they join than rigid academic scholarly study of scripture and its meaning and instruction in our lives.
I am convinced that catholicism, at least at the top level at the vatican, is evil and satanic. It's visible in multiple ways, not just by their words or messages or appearance. https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/19BtUZJQe0/catholicism--compromised--i-cann/c
Some may have knowledge of Scripture but they don't know enough about Church history and their papal teachings, canon and dogma. Which makes no sense because that's what makes them catholic and not protestant. If they only read the Bible and interpret it as they like (i.e. being their own pope), then they're not catholic.
Yeah well much of my criticism toward catholics equally applies to protestants so we're just in a very challenging time in history for Christianity. I think it cursed itself from judaizing heresies.
they think they can use the Catechism, without needing a pope.
Where in the Bible does it say Christians need a pope?
It's an internal critique of Roman Catholicism. He's not saying the Bible says so. Catholics quote the keys given to Peter as the justification for papal supremacy over the rest of the bishops. But this doesn't hold to scrutiny.
During the first millennium the Roman pontiff was considered first among equals but that was an honorary title. Rome didn't have primacy and Peter himself presided over Alexandria and Antioch so there's no reason to put Rome first. The doctrine of papal supremacy and the establishment of the Western Church as a geopolitical worldly power with standing armies and banks was a later development which occurred after the great schism of 1054. Basically, RC is the first protestant sect with the Pope as their leader.
The Catholic Orthodox Church had a synodal structure - the same structure we see in today's Eastern Orthodox. It was never ruled in a centralized manner by one infallible guy.
Someone says "If you total the combined death toll from: The Crusades European Wars of Religion Taiping Rebellion Mahdist War Modern Extremist Movements " and that "nobody will enter "Heaven" as it exists. the entire point of the new testament is how God will bring His Kingdom down to earth. the pagan concept of going to Heaven is one of the worst false doctrines inflicted upon mainstream Christianity. Those passages are referring to the 1000 year period after Christ's second advent when Satan is put into a temporary prison and has NOTHING to do with going to heaven."
Weren't a lot of the top feminists Jewish? They sure don't promote feminism in hardcore religious Jewish sects
Yes, synogogue of Satan. They didn't make feminism to help women. They made it to destroy women and families.
That's cope. We live in a gynocentric society and women have never had that much attention at any point, nor has there been as many low T thirsty simps to go around. Men will always want women and they will settle for feminists (basically every woman in the west) because they have no other choice. Many of the men have also been indoctrinated into holding feminist ideas about gender equality, anti-traditionalism and gender roles being a social construct, so they don't mind being with like minded women.
In conclusion - women have more power than ever but they are still miserable because today's society goes against God's natural order. We all feel the negative effects while the jews celebrate their success.
Goes way before Rockefeller, who is a jewish pawn himself. It's safe to say they started advancing their agenda with the revolutionary movements of the 18c. in the US and France. They had to get rid of the Church and of monarchy - the old patriarchal world order first, in favor of enlightenment secularism (freemasonry/illuminism), liberalism and republicanism/democracy. Once you get rid of the institutions that ground the Christian moral and way of life, marriage, family, identity and relations between the sexes are easy to subvert.
I dont know if op's point is true.
Do you know of any women suffering consequences for being insufferable feminists? I don't. I mean, they were always miserable people. So if you mean misery is the consequence, well miserable middle aged cat ladies who sip cheap wine alone at night on the weekends cuddled up with their three cats watching saturday night live or jimmy kimmel .....those women have been around a long time.
Speaking of monarchy, I have wondered why the left has Monarchy Derangement Syndrome. What is so allegedly inherently bad about monarchy that the ones bashing it are typically NOT on the political right?
It goes against their core belief in the revolutionary ethos which is propagated by jews (using fronts like freemasonry and jesuits) for the sole reason to do away with Christianity because they're of Satan and hate everything that is good and true because it's the stamp of the Creator. They hate humanity and all of creation and want to destroy it (that's why they love to depop and murder).
For our civilization, monarchy is rooted in Christianity and it's an expression of the divine hierarchy with God being the ultimate monarch at the top. This chain of command goes all the way down to each man being both the monarch and the priest of his household.
Leftists (jews) want to do away with this order which they deem as inherently oppressive. They rebel against the natural order of the world just like their master Satan/Lucifer did - he too felt oppressed by God's monarchy because he was envious, prideful and didn't want to serve anyone but himself (sound familiar? We all tend to be like that because we're fallen ourselves). They ultimately want to replace God and become gods themselves. This is the common trait shared by everyone who's opposed to Christianity - be it new age, atheists, transhumanists, satanists.
I was right with you until:
What are you even talking about? Is it because he was the only non-Jewish monopolist?
I'm not expert on the Rockafeller family but just assumed that they were jew or crypto-jew
According to his wiki he was a hardcore Baptist who credited his success to God a d spent much of his life in philanthropy.
I don't know much either, but I can't find any ties between him, his family, and eitehr the NatSoc or Fascist movements.
Which leads me to suspect OP is using the term 'Nazi" to mean "generic bad guy", in which case I would discard his opinion.
Rockafeller is Jewish and the original Nazis are also Jewish. Rockafeller is basically a 2nd generation Rothschild.
Plenty of this post is
CORRECT.
Women used to be kind of a mystery to men before social media.
Now, we know exactly who they are; and we generally don't like most of them.
We all know that women with tats, colored hair and nose rings all think the same liberal mindset. No point in having a conversation with them.
Mudsharks are untouchable. The super-vaccinated are untouchable.
Born-again bitches are previously one of the above.
You have to be one of the good men and wait for one of the good women. She’s out there. I’ve seen some of them. Full blown women complete with principles who cook, clean and keep their man inspired.