Many are complaining that guys don't approach them anymore. They don't flirt with them or ask them out.
This is because the point of feminism is to make women so unattractive that no man wants them. They convince women to become ugly by claiming that kind of behavior is empowering.
Here are the key points they push:
-
They want women to have tattoos and piercings everywhere to look trashy. Men don't like trashy women. Men like feminine, angelic women.
-
They don't want women to cook or clean. Cooking and cleaning has been historically big with women because innately men know our job is to protect and serve and women know their job is to inspire men. With a woman's inspiration, the man is able to protect and serve even better. This creates a power couple who live in a happy relationship. No man wants to come home from a hard day of work to a messy house and no food. That makes him feel unappreciated and goes against historic tradition. The tradition is actually beneficial for the couple. Without it, the man underperforms which harms both sexes. Good food is inspiring. A clean house is inspiring. There are many other ways to inspire.
-
They want women to have a tough, manly attitude. Men don't like manly attitudes. Men like feminine, angelic attitudes. Women are naturally in a better place in the mental world. Men are more in a better place in the external world making men fierce in ways. Men don't want fierce women. Men want angelic, sweet, feminine women. If men wanted fierce women, they would be gay.
-
They want women to abandon the children in day care so that the Gov can manipulate them there. Men want women to stay home and raise their children in a healthy environment. They are willing to work 8 hours a day for the family but no man wants his wife in some job where other men can flirt with her while the kids get brainwashed in daycare by Gov agents.
This issue hasn't effected all countries. Many foreign countries still have women in them. Everyone is different. Some play their role well, some play it horribly bad.
The one thing for sure is that the more of a feminist a woman is, the more unlikely she will ever date or marry a man because the feminist ideal is completely the opposite of what men life.
But that was the goal from the beginning when the Nazi Rockafeller family created this psyop to separate man and woman to destabilize society. Now they are trying to manipulate men to dress like women but luckily not so many men are falling for it.
Where in the Bible does it say Christians need a pope?
It's an internal critique of Roman Catholicism. He's not saying the Bible says so. Catholics quote the keys given to Peter as the justification for papal supremacy over the rest of the bishops. But this doesn't hold to scrutiny.
During the first millennium the Roman pontiff was considered first among equals but that was an honorary title. Rome didn't have primacy and Peter himself presided over Alexandria and Antioch so there's no reason to put Rome first. The doctrine of papal supremacy and the establishment of the Western Church as a geopolitical worldly power with standing armies and banks was a later development which occurred after the great schism of 1054. Basically, RC is the first protestant sect with the Pope as their leader.
The Catholic Orthodox Church had a synodal structure - the same structure we see in today's Eastern Orthodox. It was never ruled in a centralized manner by one infallible guy.
Someone says "If you total the combined death toll from: The Crusades European Wars of Religion Taiping Rebellion Mahdist War Modern Extremist Movements " and that "nobody will enter "Heaven" as it exists. the entire point of the new testament is how God will bring His Kingdom down to earth. the pagan concept of going to Heaven is one of the worst false doctrines inflicted upon mainstream Christianity. Those passages are referring to the 1000 year period after Christ's second advent when Satan is put into a temporary prison and has NOTHING to do with going to heaven."
God has already brought His Kingdom down to Earth - it's His Church. There are no 1000 years after Christ's second advent - nobody believed in this before the Reformation. The Church teaches that Christ will dethrone the antichrist, the dead will be resurrected and everyone will be judged and then the world will end. This is the correct eschatological teaching.
The 1000 years of Satan being imprisoned refers to the first millennium of the Church when the Christianized Roman Empire, aka Byzantium, ruled the world keeping Satan at bay. This period ended with the apostasy of the Western Church which subsequently led to the protestant Reformation, the freemasonic Enlightenment and its revolutions, the nihilist XXc and whatever satanic clown world we live in today.
Thx for info.
Do people go to Heaven, though?
What about the death toll from (XYZ+), what's up with those events?
And how do you know WHAT the 1K years of the devil being imprisoned were? Or even that it was in the past??? There is nothing in the Bible referring to that specifically.