Porn would still exist for people who really wanted to find it, just like all illegal goods do. Accepting (or even advocating for) complete and total informational control by the very people who were pushing the porn to begin with in order to eliminate those edge cases is absolutely irrational and what outs you as an overly emotional pearl clutcher
Porn would still exist for people who really wanted to find it
Sure. But it wouldn’t be legal. It wouldn’t be free. It wouldn’t be everywhere. And jews wouldn’t profit. That’s the point.
Accepting (or even advocating for) complete and total informational control by the very people who were pushing the porn to begin with in order to eliminate those edge cases is absolutely irrational
Actually, you did, by asking how porn could be banned without the framework to ban it (informational control) when I said it should be made illegal, you implied porn could not "just" be made illegal WITHOUT it. The stance you're adopting now (that it should be illegal WITHOUT information and technological control) is a retroactive modification of your statements and agreeing with me but you continue thinking that your spastic attitude gives you some kind of win and moral high ground.
Actually, you did, by asking how porn could be banned without the framework to ban it (informational control) when I said it should be made illegal, you implied porn could not "just" be made illegal WITHOUT it.
Cool, yeah. Your point is what.
The stance you're adopting now (that it should be illegal WITHOUT information and technological control)
Explain what you think a law is.
is a retroactive modification of your statements
So stop retroactively modifying them.
you continue thinking that your spastic attitude gives you some kind of win and moral high ground.
So stop thinking that.
It’s pretty fucking simple to comprehend.
Jews want porn to be legal.
Porn is objectively bad.
Porn should not be legal.
Make porn illegal.
There is no
“WAAAAAA MOMMY YOU CAN’T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT YOU HAVE TO LET IT INTO SOCIETY BECAUSE MY FEELINGS GET HURT BY THE CONCEPT OF THE FRAMEWORK REQUIRED TO ENFORCE A LAW!”
Porn would still exist for people who really wanted to find it, just like all illegal goods do. Accepting (or even advocating for) complete and total informational control by the very people who were pushing the porn to begin with in order to eliminate those edge cases is absolutely irrational and what outs you as an overly emotional pearl clutcher
Sure. But it wouldn’t be legal. It wouldn’t be free. It wouldn’t be everywhere. And jews wouldn’t profit. That’s the point.
Good thing no one did that. Run the fuck along.
Actually, you did, by asking how porn could be banned without the framework to ban it (informational control) when I said it should be made illegal, you implied porn could not "just" be made illegal WITHOUT it. The stance you're adopting now (that it should be illegal WITHOUT information and technological control) is a retroactive modification of your statements and agreeing with me but you continue thinking that your spastic attitude gives you some kind of win and moral high ground.
Cool, yeah. Your point is what.
Explain what you think a law is.
So stop retroactively modifying them.
So stop thinking that.
It’s pretty fucking simple to comprehend.
There is no
because that’s mental illness. On your part.
See? You continue to completely misrepresent what this conversation was so you can "win". Good luck with your book