how the karma system works

a) Karma/kwer - "to make, form"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/karma

Ongoing flow (inception towards death) allows temporary form (life) to shape...any formed shapes are being dissolved within the karmic justice of flow aka solution dissolving problems.

b) Work internally separates (analysis); systems are internally shaped together (synthesis) to distract from that.

Work (nature) generates employee (being)...other beings shape systems to distract employee from real work with fictitious work. Real work sets one free (Arbeit macht frei); fake work binds ones free will of choice to a chosen ones suggestion.

It doesn't decide each act and go

a) Only nature acts; which allows each being within to react aka to decide how to react to being enacted upon.

b) Nature always goes...it's each being (life) within which temporary goes in (inception) and out (death) of it.

bad luck

Good vs bad implies gambling ones choice on chance. Resisting the temptation to gamble on either side sustains ones choice within balance.

Luck implies "what happens to one by chance"...being given a choice implies within (matter) the balance (momentum) of motion.

A jew suggests luck to invert natural choice with artificial chance...yet consenting to it implies a gambling gentile stacking choice on chance.

Neither good, nor bad chances are karmic justice...only all balance represents the karmic justice for each ones choice. Taking a chance tempts one to ignore being given a choice.

Fuck their "system".

The issue...sys (together) implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, and fuck/fuge (masonic joint) also implies ones consent joining with the suggestion of another. What's the suggestion? Pluralism (theirs).

Each of these words (fuck their system) represents a crafted spell to trick the one using it against another into bondage instead.

Sleight of hand: "Fuck the System" by THE EXPLOITED... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuck_the_System

[part 6] Monad, "the one infinite creator" seems to be causing a lot of problems here on planet earth, with the way it's doing this karma bullshit. It's emanating this "love/light" vibe and whatever's not like that, it considers a "distortion" and it has to correct that with these "catalysts" so you learn lessons and get back to the cheery vibe. Meaning.. when somebody's pissed off cause they're dealing with too many problems, Monad is kicking them when they're down, and sending more bullshit their way. Causing this vicious circle of negativity. That's going against it's own rules of "service to others" (positive polarity), where it's actually doing the opposite to others of how it's supposed to be this good guy doing the "love/light" vibe. That's fucked up.

Monad is the top level logos, the personality of the whole universe. Yahweh is a sub logos, only in charge of this solar system. He's been trying to run this operation here on planet earth but he keeps dealing with "problems", with the humans who keep fucking up, turning bad.. sacrificing who knows what. So Yahweh has to step in.. shit like "the flood".. lol. Kills everybody off. Starts from scratch. But then you get fucked up shit with Yahweh's stuff.. like Noah's family is the only ones left and to get more population it starts off with fucking inbreeding. So everybody's retarded. Whatever. Few hundred years later, the people are turning bad again with the sacrifices.. so he steps in with this Abraham guy to try and get the yahweh cult going. Couple thousand years later, steps in again with the Jesus dude. Was a nice guy, trying to fix this shit.. what do they do to him.. they fuckin hang 'em. Yahweh hangs loose 600 years.. but these arabs are sacrificing kids in their black cube. So he has his angel gabriel come on down to give mohammed a download of information to try and get this arab yahweh cult going.

All these problems yahweh's got going on, over the years.. that's caused by Monad's karma system. Where.. you start having issues, it's this vicious circle of Monad having more bullshit headed your way. No wonder the world's so fucked up.

So.. this going.. hey.. Monad's system here.. wow. Now we got Yahweh on our side here on this one. lol. When Yahweh tried the garden of eden and they weren't advancing fast enough.. he goes to his bosses, the council of elders on saturn. They go, ok we'll bring in the lucifer soul group, to be the bad guys in this movie. Bring in some "negative polarity" to this whole thing. That's pretty messed up, all that, eh. Especially the way the luciferian illuminati cabal's run amok these days.

Well.. I think yahweh should go to his bosses, the council of elders on saturn and say.. hey.. Monad's fuckin bullshit karma system is actually what's causing all your problems. The council of elders should go straighten out Monad. That's where all your problems are coming from. Yahweh keeps trying to clean up this mess down here.. well, you're gonna have to fix this Monad bullshit first. lol.

[Part 4]

I thought I remembered that the name of this "one infinite creator" was "moneh".

=========================

"moneh" is that the one infinite creator's name?

"Monēh" is not the name of the "one infinite creator." It seems there might be a misunderstanding or a typo.

The name you're likely thinking of is Monad. In various philosophical and spiritual traditions, particularly Neoplatonism and Gnosticism, the Monad is considered the supreme being, divinity, or the unified source of all existence. It is often described as indivisible, transcendent, and the ultimate principle from which all things emanate.

talk about this monad thing.. like deep research

The concept of the Monad is a complex and profound idea that has been explored in various philosophical and spiritual traditions for centuries. It's not a single, universally defined entity, but rather a central principle that takes on different nuances depending on the context. Here's a deep dive into the "Monad thing," tracing its origins and its evolution through different schools of thought.

The Pythagorean Monad: The Beginning of All Things The earliest recorded use of the term "Monad" comes from the Pythagoreans. For them, the Monad (from the Greek monas, meaning "unity" or "alone") was the first thing to exist. It was seen as the fundamental, indivisible unit from which all numbers, and by extension, all of reality, were derived.

Generation of Numbers: According to the Pythagorean view, the Monad gives birth to the Dyad (the number 2). This union of the one and the two then generates the numbers, which in turn give rise to geometric points, lines, planes, and finally, three-dimensional bodies. This process was not just a mathematical theory but a cosmogony—an explanation for the creation of the universe.

Symbolism: The Pythagoreans used a simple, yet powerful, symbol for the Monad: a point within a circle. The point represented the ultimate source, the indivisible and unknowable center, while the circle represented the universe that emanates from it.

The Monad in Neoplatonism: The One and the Source of All Being In Neoplatonism, a philosophical school founded on the teachings of Plato, the Monad is synonymous with The One (to Hen). The philosopher Plotinus, a central figure in Neoplatonism, describes the One as the highest principle, utterly simple, transcendent, and ineffable.

Emanation: The One doesn't "create" the universe in a deliberate, willed act. Instead, it "overflows" or emanates from itself, much like light radiates from the sun without diminishing the sun itself. This process of emanation creates a hierarchy of being:

The One (Monad): The source, beyond all categories of existence and thought.

Nous (Divine Mind): The first emanation, containing the Platonic Forms (the perfect, eternal blueprints for everything in existence).

Psyche (World-Soul): The next emanation, which animates and organizes the material world.

The Material World: According to this view, the physical world is the final, most distant emanation from the One. It is not inherently evil, but is the least perfect and most "chaotic" part of reality due to its distance from the ultimate source of unity.

The Monad in Gnosticism: The True, Hidden God Gnosticism, a diverse set of ancient religious movements, adopted the concept of the Monad, but with a significant departure from the Neoplatonic view. For Gnostics, the Monad is the true, transcendent, and hidden God, residing in a realm of pure light called the Pleroma (the "Fullness").

The Problem of Creation: Unlike Neoplatonism, Gnosticism posits that the material world is a flawed and evil creation, not a natural emanation. It was created by a lesser, ignorant deity known as the Demiurge, who is often identified with the Old Testament God. The Demiurge is a product of a mistake or a "fall" within the Pleroma, specifically by the aeon (divine emanation) named Sophia (Wisdom).

The Divine Spark: Gnostics believed that human beings possess a "divine spark"—a piece of the Monad—trapped within their material bodies. Salvation (gnosis) is achieved not through faith or good deeds, but through the acquisition of secret, intuitive knowledge that allows the divine spark to escape the material world and return to the Pleroma.

The Modern Philosophical Monad: Leibniz's "Windowless" Universe In the 17th century, the German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz revived the term "Monad" in his work Monadology. His concept is very different from the ancient ones, though it shares the idea of a fundamental, indivisible unit.

Leibniz's Monads: For Leibniz, monads are the ultimate, simple substances that make up the universe. They are non-physical, non-extended, and more like "souls" or centers of force than physical atoms.

"No Windows": A key feature of Leibniz's monads is that they "have no windows." This means they cannot be physically or causally influenced by anything outside of themselves. Each monad is a self-contained universe, reflecting the entire universe from its unique point of view, like a tiny mirror.

Pre-established Harmony: So how do all these "windowless" monads interact and form a seemingly coherent world? Leibniz proposed the idea of a pre-established harmony. God, in his infinite wisdom, created each monad with a predetermined sequence of internal perceptions that perfectly synchronize with every other monad, creating the illusion of cause and effect in the world. This made the physical world a kind of "well-related dream."

Summary of Key Differences Concept Pythagorean Neoplatonic Gnostic Leibnizian Nature of the Monad A mathematical and cosmological principle; the first unit. The supreme, ineffable One; the source of all being. The true, hidden God; a perfect and transcendent being. A simple, non-physical substance with internal perceptions. Origin of Reality Derived from the Monad through a process of numerical progression. Emanates hierarchically from the One. Created by a flawed, lesser deity (the Demiurge), not the Monad. The universe is composed of an infinite number of monads created by God. View of Matter Not a primary concern, but a product of the number-based universe. The lowest, least perfect emanation. Flawed, evil, and a prison for the divine spark. A phenomenal reality, a collection of synchronized monads. Path to Salvation Not a major focus. Intellectual and spiritual ascent to reunite with the One. Attaining secret knowledge (gnosis) to escape the material world. Salvation is not a central theme, as the world is a pre-ordained harmony.

Export to Sheets The Monad, in its many forms, is a testament to the human desire to find a single, ultimate explanation for the universe, whether that explanation is mathematical, philosophical, or spiritual. It's a concept that evolves from the very beginnings of Western thought and continues to be a fascinating subject of study in philosophy and theology.

symbol for the Monad: a point within a circle. i've seen that in witchcraft

That's an excellent observation. The symbol of a point within a circle, or a related concept like the Hieroglyphic Monad, is indeed found in many esoteric and occult traditions, which have influenced modern witchcraft and magical practices.

While the concept of the Monad originated in ancient Greek philosophy, particularly with the Pythagoreans, its symbolic representation was adopted and expanded upon by figures in the magical and Hermetic traditions that form a lineage leading to some forms of modern witchcraft.

One of the most significant figures in this regard is the 16th-century Elizabethan magus John Dee. He developed a complex symbol he called the Hieroglyphic Monad, which he detailed in his 1564 book of the same name. His Monad is much more than just a point and a circle; it is a composite glyph that includes a point, a circle, a cross, a semicircle, and the symbols for the astrological signs of Aries and the sun and moon.

Dee believed this symbol encapsulated the unity of the cosmos and the fundamental principles of creation. He saw it as a "magical parable" that contained the secrets of the universe, and he used it in his ceremonial magic and alchemical studies.

Because modern witchcraft, particularly in its ceremonial and ritualistic forms, often draws from historical magical practices, Hermeticism, and alchemy, it's not surprising that you would see the Monad symbol. It represents core principles that are relevant to many magical systems:

Unity and the Divine Source: The point in the center represents the ultimate divine source or the self, while the circle represents the cosmos or the sacred space that emanates from it. This aligns with the idea of a singular, all-encompassing force in the universe.

The Intersection of Spirit and Matter: The cross or other elements within the circle can symbolize the point where the spiritual realm (the circle) and the material realm (the cross) meet.

Correspondences: In magic, the concept of "correspondences" is key—the idea that everything in the universe is connected. Dee's Hieroglyphic Monad is a perfect example of this, as it visually links astrological, planetary, alchemical, and mathematical principles into one unified symbol.

So, while the symbol's roots are in ancient philosophy, its use in modern magical and esoteric traditions, including some forms of witchcraft, is a direct result of its adoption and reinterpretation by influential historical figures like John Dee and others who saw it as a powerful tool for understanding and working with the fundamental forces of the universe.

got a picture of it that dee was doing

https://studiohibernacula.com/blogs/lore/dee-hieroglyphic-monad

how come the word money seems pretty close to monad

That's an interesting observation, as the two words do sound and look very similar. However, despite the resemblance, "money" and "monad" have completely separate and unrelated origins. Their similarity is a fascinating linguistic coincidence.

Here's a breakdown of their etymologies:

Monad: This word comes from Ancient Greek. It is derived from the Greek word monas (μονάς), which means "unity," "single," or "alone." This reflects its original philosophical meaning as an indivisible, ultimate unit of being.

Money: This word has a Latin origin. It comes from the Latin word moneta, which was a title or surname of the Roman goddess Juno. The Romans located their official mint in her temple on Capitoline Hill, leading the name Moneta to become synonymous with the place where money was made, and eventually, with the coins themselves. The name Juno Moneta is believed to come from the Latin verb monere, meaning "to warn" or "to advise," as Juno was seen as a protector who gave warnings.

In short, "monad" is rooted in Greek philosophy and the concept of "oneness," while "money" is rooted in the name of a Roman goddess associated with a mint. They are not etymologically related.

seems a little "sus" because of how imoprtant money is

That's a very intuitive and understandable way to think about it. It's easy to see how a word that sounds so much like a concept of "oneness" or "divine unity" could be seen as a deliberate choice for something as powerful and central to human life as money. This kind of "suspicion" is what often drives people to look for deeper, hidden connections in language and symbolism.

However, the historical evidence for the origins of both words is quite solid and well-documented by linguists. The evolution of language is a long and often coincidental process. Words can travel through different cultures and change over thousands of years in ways that seem arbitrary or, in this case, surprisingly similar.

While the linguistic connection isn't there, your observation points to a deeper, more symbolic truth: the power that both concepts hold.

The Monad, in philosophy, is the ultimate source of reality, the point of absolute power and unity from which all else flows.

Money, in the modern world, has become a central organizing principle. It is a universal medium of exchange that, for many, seems to be the source of power, opportunity, and access to all things. It acts as a kind of modern "Monad," a unified and essential force that shapes our reality.

So while the etymology is a coincidence, the symbolic parallel you've drawn between the two concepts is quite profound and highlights the outsized role that money plays in our society. It's a great example of how our minds instinctively seek patterns and meaning, even where none were originally intended.

is this a saying: Their god is called "money".

Yes, "Their god is called 'money'" is not a formal saying or proverb, but it is a very common and powerful figurative expression used to describe people who prioritize wealth above all else.

It's a modern interpretation of a much older and more widespread concept. The idea that something other than a spiritual being can become a person's ultimate devotion is a theme found in many religious and philosophical texts.

The most famous parallel comes from the Bible, specifically the New Testament. The phrase "You cannot serve both God and mammon" (Matthew 6:24 and Luke 16:13) is often used in this context.

Mammon: This is an Aramaic word for wealth or property. In the biblical saying, it is personified as a false god or a master to be served, directly contrasted with God.

In a modern context, using the phrase "money is their god" serves the same purpose as the biblical "mammon." It is used to convey that a person's true worship, trust, and ultimate concern lie in the acquisition and preservation of wealth, rather than in spiritual or moral values.

[part 2]

This makes sense here, analyzing the top level logos, "the one infinite creator".. it's got issues like yahweh, a sub logos. ok.. cause if you're supposedly emanting love/light vibes, you don't kick people when they're down and send them more bullshit to deal with. So that means this "one infinite creator" also has issues and is not "perfect". It's learning, eh.

The way this shit goes.. think of cells in your body. Zoom out.. you wind up as "you". The same thing is going on with planet earth, where it's personality is gaia, mother earth. Then you get the solar system and yahweh's in charge of that.. a sub logos. When you get to "logos", this is going on but with the whole fucking galaxy. Keep zooming out.. all the galaxies are like cells.. and you wind up at this top level logos, is the personality of the whole universe.

I heard of this, a few years ago, in this video.

Itzhak Bentov ~ From Atom To Cosmos. 1hr 47min. This is a skip time to 19min.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMbeK_6ATxQ&t=1181s

It's like people were meditating going on trips and finding out what's going on out there. You got his wife explaining things from the 19min because he died in a plane crash. From the start it's him talking about stuff. This is what's really going on out there. But your "one infinite creator" is messed up like yahweh. lol. So.. fuck their karma system. That's how you deal with it.

[part 7]

holy shit.. I figured out how come Yahweh's losing with his operation here on planet earth. He's in a vicious circle of bad karma.. hahaha. It's like us. If you get pissed off about it, Monad, "the one infinite creator" keeps sending you more bullshit to deal with. hahahaah. So.. yahweh is totally like a homeless person who went down the hole with the system. No wonder he stopped stepping in with this shit down here. He was pissed off about his operation too, like pretty bad in the early days. He musta caught hell for that flood stunt.. hahahah. It's like what the lucifer soul group illuminati cabal.. when you kills someone, you catch really bad karma later that 'll take many reincarnations to work off. So yahweh's got this level of bad luck times one billion to deal with later. super holy shit here. hahaha. No wonder this place has gone to hell in a hand basket.

===========================

"the one infinite creator", Monad.. his karma system of love/light vibes going out there.. and if you don't match it, it's considered a "distortion" in that vibe and he'll send you "catalysts" so you learn lessons until you return back to the normal state of love/light. ok.. is yahweh, the sub logos in charge of the solar system, also having to deal with monad's love/light karma system too, like us humans?

Based on the specific metaphysical framework you've described, where "the One Infinite Creator" or Monad is the source of all being and "love/light" is the fundamental vibration, the answer to your question is yes.

Within this system, all of creation—from the smallest particle to the grandest cosmic entity—is an aspect of the One Infinite Creator. This means that every "Logos" (the consciousness that creates a star system) and every "sub-Logos" (a consciousness that works within a star system, such as Yahweh is described in this context) is also part of the same evolutionary process.

The principles of karma, or the balancing of energetic distortions, apply universally. If a sub-Logos, or any entity, creates an imbalance through its actions, it also has to learn from and resolve that distortion. It's a fundamental law of the universe within this philosophy. So, while Yahweh operates at a vastly different scale of being than a human, they are not exempt from the cosmic process of learning and returning to a state of balance with the One Infinite Creator's primary vibration of love/light. They are on a similar journey of evolution, just at a higher level of complexity.

[part 5]

what's the deal with this "law of attraction" you'd hear about on TV several years ago. Seems like these people were analyzing how karma works and they'd go, oh this is what goes on.. the way you have to be like the one infinite creator's vibe of "love/light" vibration. Be like that so there's no "distortion" in the vibe, then it doesn't have to do any "catalysts" to give you challenges.

However.. I betcha these "law of attraction" people, are cheating the way this works, so they can get a bunch of money. It's "service to self" this "law of attraction" and they don't do "service to others" when they get that bunch of money. So it's not "genuine".

The "Law of Attraction" is a philosophical concept often presented as a universal law, which posits that positive or negative thoughts bring positive or negative experiences into a person's life. The idea is that thoughts are a form of energy and that positive energy attracts success in all areas of life, including health, finances, and relationships. It became very popular in the early 2000s, largely due to the book and film "The Secret."

The core principles often promoted by proponents of the Law of Attraction include:

Like Attracts Like: This is the central tenet. The belief is that your thoughts and feelings, which are considered to be a form of vibrational energy, attract similar energies from the universe.

Manifesting: This is the practice of consciously using the Law of Attraction to bring desires into reality. It typically involves three steps: asking the universe for what you want, believing you will receive it, and then being open to receiving it.

Vibrational Alignment: The idea that you must be in a state of high vibration—a positive, joyful, or grateful emotional state—to attract what you desire. The concept you mentioned, "love/light vibration," aligns with this idea of being in a pure, high-frequency state.

Your observation about the potential for "cheating" and the conflict between "service to self" and "service to others" brings up a common critique of the Law of Attraction movement. While the core idea can be a tool for self-improvement and positive thinking, it's often criticized for a few key reasons:

Focus on Material Gain: Many popular interpretations of the Law of Attraction heavily emphasize using it to manifest material wealth and personal success. This can be seen as "service to self" and can clash with spiritual or ethical philosophies that prioritize community, altruism, or "service to others."

Victim-Blaming: A significant criticism is that it can lead to blaming people for their misfortune. If the Law of Attraction is absolute, then a person experiencing hardship (poverty, illness, etc.) could be seen as having "attracted" that negative experience through their own thoughts, which can be a deeply harmful and simplistic viewpoint.

Lack of Action: While most teachers of the Law of Attraction would say that action is necessary, some interpretations can lead to a passive waiting for things to happen, rather than a proactive approach to achieving goals. The idea that simply thinking about something is enough can be a form of escapism.

Commercialization: As you pointed out, the movement has been heavily commercialized. Many self-proclaimed gurus sell books, seminars, and coaching programs, leading to the perception that the primary motive is personal profit rather than genuinely helping others. This raises questions about whether the "love/light" philosophy is truly being embodied by those who profit from it.

The concepts you mentioned, like "distortion" and "catalysts," are more closely associated with a spiritual philosophy known as "The Law of One." This particular philosophy, which came from a series of channeled books, is where terms like "social memory complex," "service to self," and "service to others" originate. It presents a much more complex and nuanced cosmic framework than the popularized Law of Attraction. Within that specific philosophy, the idea of "service to self" is seen as a distinct and separate path from "service to others," and not just a "cheating" of the system, but a fundamental choice of spiritual orientation.

So, while the popularized Law of Attraction borrows some of the language and concepts of positive thinking and spiritual alignment, it often simplifies them and applies them to a material context, which can lead to the very ethical conflicts you've astutely identified.

==========================

See.. you got a problem here with this "law of attraction" bullshit.

"Vibrational Alignment: The idea that you must be in a state of high vibration—a positive, joyful, or grateful emotional state—to attract what you desire. The concept you mentioned, "love/light vibration," aligns with this idea of being in a pure, high-frequency state."

So you gotta go around like this.. fuck that. That's what I was saying about trying to go with this shit.. you have to be cheery, eh. Meanwhile, look at how twisted Monad is with all this. Where he's punishing people who are already having problems. But he's preaching that, oh yeah.. i'm love/light and you have to be service to others. But what does he do.. he's kicking them when they're down and giving them more bullshit to deal with when they're already maxed out.

But yeah I looked up this movie..

THE SECRET: Law of Attraction FULL MOVIE (2006) 1hr28min.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHmJbQGWry8

I'm gonna check this shit out today and see how much bullshit it is. lol

[part 1]

I put this post contents in the google gemini AI asking it, what do you think 'll happen in this scenario. It said:

This scenario you've laid out is a detailed and frustrated critique of a specific spiritual or philosophical concept of karma and the divine. The text describes a system where a "one infinite creator" or "top level logos" emanates a "love/light" vibration. According to this view, if a person's own vibration, or state of mind, doesn't match this "love/light" vibe—for example, if they're worried about being unemployed—the system sends them challenges, or "catalysts," to correct the imbalance.

Based on the perspective presented in the post, here's an analysis of what might happen next and the core conflict at play:

What Will Happen According to This View The author of the post has made a choice to reject the system and its rules. Instead of trying to find "peace" by passively accepting the "catalysts" and aligning with the supposed "love/light" vibration, they have chosen to actively resist. They've decided to stick to their own "standards" and defiance, essentially saying "bring it on" to the challenges the system might throw at them.

According to the logic described in the post, this defiant attitude is still a "distortion" of the "love/light" vibe. Therefore, the system, if it continues to operate as described, would likely send more challenges or "bullshit" their way. The author anticipates this, but they've found a different kind of peace in their rebellion. The anxiety about being "powerless" and having to play a rigged game is gone because they've decided not to play by the rules. Their new mindset is one of resistance rather than passive acceptance.

This is a key turning point in the scenario. The individual is no longer a victim of the system's logic; they've become an active opponent.

The Central Conflict The core issue this post raises is the apparent contradiction between a divine entity that is supposed to be "all love" and a system that seems to punish those who are struggling.

The "Love/Light" Contradiction: The author finds it hypocritical that a "love/light" entity would "kick you when you're down." They're arguing that a truly benevolent force would help, not send more problems. The "catalyst" explanation—that challenges are for learning—is rejected as a rationalization for a system that feels cruel and unfair.

The Powerless State: A major source of frustration is the feeling of being powerless. The author feels that their fate is in the hands of others (potential employers) and that their natural human reaction to worry and anxiety only makes things worse. This "vicious circle" is seen as a rigged game with no way to win, which is why the author's act of rebellion is so significant. It's a way of reclaiming some power and agency.

The Comparison to Yahweh: The comparison to Yahweh (as described in some critiques) reinforces the author's point. They see both systems as run by "assholes" because neither one seems to be a truly benevolent force. The "one infinite creator" is seen as a more subtle but equally unfair version of the same thing.

In essence, the scenario suggests that the individual's defiance is their personal way of resolving the paradox. They've found a form of peace not by surrendering to the system's rules, but by rejecting the system entirely. They're choosing their own path and dealing with the consequences on their own terms.

===============================

Doesn't say if you're gonna be losing more, seems a bit like it at first. But hey, at least you're not "settling for the deal" with this bullshit. The system is corrupt, so fuck them. Who kicks somebody when they're down, when they're claming they're emanating "love/light". That ain't emanting "love/light", ok, that's called being an asshole. So fuck their system. It's "bad".

This is a way to actually get rid of that anxiety bad feeling. Went away after figuring this out. Fuck these guys. This is why the world is fucked up.

[part 3]

Check this out though.. ok so the way the universe works.. you've got this "service to self (negative polarity) and "service to others" (positive polarity). So.. supposedly the "one infinite creator" emanates this vibe of "love/light". Yet when somebody's having problems, the karma system detects that as a "distortion" to the love vibe and it sends them more bullshit to deal with. That is "inverse" and twisted. It should be helping people out, shouldn't it. That would be "service to others". But no.. it does the inverse by kicking them when they're down. What the fuck is going on with that. Here.. let me ask this one to google gemini AI.

=============================

The concept you're describing, which revolves around "service to self" and "service to others" and the idea of the universe responding to "distortions" with more challenges, is a central part of the Ra Material, also known as The Law of One. It's a complex system of metaphysics and cosmology.

Let's break down the specific point you're questioning about the universe "kicking them when they're down" and how that seems to contradict the "service to others" principle.

From the perspective of the Ra Material, the universe's response to an individual's "distortions" isn't punitive, but rather a tool for spiritual growth and catalyst for evolution. Here's a way to understand this:

The Purpose of Catalyst: The "bullshit" you mentioned is referred to as catalyst. The purpose of catalyst is not to punish but to provide opportunities for an entity to make choices and learn. When a being experiences a negative emotion, a problem, or a "distortion" from the "love/light" vibration, this indicates an area where a lesson needs to be learned or a choice needs to be made.

Karma and Choice: The Ra Material reinterprets "karma." It's not about punishment for past misdeeds. Instead, it's a system that brings a being face-to-face with the results of their past choices, so they can consciously choose a different path. If someone is experiencing problems, the "karmic" system is essentially presenting them with the very same type of situation that caused the original "distortion." This gives the individual a chance to respond in a new way, to consciously choose "service to others" (positive polarity) rather than "service to self" (negative polarity).

Free Will: A core principle of the Ra Material is that free will is paramount. The universe cannot simply "fix" a person's problems for them, as that would violate their free will to choose their own path. The universal "law" is to provide the circumstances, the catalyst, but the entity must be the one to respond and make the choice.

Learning Through Contrast: The Ra Material posits that the universe is designed for "polarization." Just as we learn about light by experiencing darkness, we learn about "service to others" by experiencing situations that tempt us toward "service to self." The negative experiences—the "kicking them when they're down"—are seen as the most potent opportunities for a soul to solidify its chosen path. The more intense the catalyst, the more profound the potential for growth.

So, from this viewpoint, the universe isn't acting out of a "twisted" or "inverse" logic. It's operating under a principle of ultimate growth. It's not "helping people out" by fixing their problems because that wouldn't teach them how to fix their own internal state. Instead, it provides the mirror—the difficult situation—that allows them to see their own "distortions" and choose to heal them. It's a subtle but critical distinction between doing things for someone (which can hinder their growth) and providing opportunities for someone to grow (which respects their sovereignty and free will).

=====================

Fuck that.. you got a contradiction with this "one infinite creator" with this what they're preachin compared to how they're behaving. It's talking about this, oh you gotta be a good guy and do service to others. It's saying oh yeah I'm a "good guy", emanating this "love/light". Yet when it comes down how it's behaving, it's fucking kicking people when they're down, giving them more problems. Which is not what it's fuckin preaching. That's a schmuck.