Earff
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
Wow, you actually disproved me. You seem like a lot of fun to be around.
Or probably just a jackass, who can't take criticism and turns every argument into a battle, because his tiny, little brain can't process information that's different than his own... Surely, all people are wrong, while, oh magnificent child of light, ONLY YOU ARE CORRECT.
If you don't like someone being disrespectful, why do you immediately stoop to the same level, and even worse?
But I don't really blame you. You're just a product of the negligence of your parents. I blame them.
But you have done so much to divert the actual topic, so let me remind you:
So, the conclusion here is that you ignored my question with "I don't care", I called you out as a person, who doesn't care, and you went with insults, because momma's boy is very special and nobody can say he is not...
The truth is that there are brain cells, who look for a new job, right there inside your brain. They are willing to work, but the neural economy is bad and they can't find none... But you overuse your amygdala for insulting anyone online, who dares to ask a question. A neural economy driven by your moto - "I don't care"...
Is my definition of you incorrect? Am I wrong to call you a bad researcher based on evidence? Have some time to think, and you will agree with me. Or you can activate your amygdala again... How well did that work in your past?
But I have a solution.
Listen to people and respond to them. If you play this "I don't care" thing, you just show that you lack empathy, and nobody likes such a person. Notice how many words I write because I have empathy towards you. Even insulted, I am still empathising, and providing reason.
To show you how much I know on the subject of human behavior, I would show you the alternative: You write insults in anger. Anger is making you think less, but react faster, so surely you wouldn't even read my message, but just lash out with insults as soon as you read something you don't agree. You won't read the full comment, so that is also how I will use this statement to prove that you don't listen, if it comes to that. Are you willing to give me exactly what I need to crush you? Or willing to accept criticism? That's your choice.
One other thing, if you wanted your child to be a good researcher, and it responded with "I don't care", I wonder how you would react... Probably with patience, showing the alternative by ironically contrast an ignorant decision, or helpful mentoring...
I wonder...
Wow dude, you just run your script and don't even try to understand where people are coming from (which would be obvious if you took a step back and red my initial comment).
All I did in this thread was to prompt the AI with the same question to see what it would answer. I then pasted the answer here. I wasn't arguing for or against the veracity of the photos (the claim) but wanted to see if the AI really did answer that way. Then you and the other new age flerf guy wrongfully concluded I was somehow defending the claim made by the model and felt the need to convince me otherwise.
How did I concluded that "you were somehow defending the claim made by the model" with the statement:
Please, explain.
I only asked you a question. You clearly mistook it for an attack. Because that's how fragile you are in real life.
That's the truth. But if you want to stand on your faulty logic - let's hear it.
How did I accuse you with a question that doesn't have anything connected to what you're saying?
Please, explain.
Because the question assumed I had a specific photo in mind and that I wasn't sure if it's altered or not.
Why ask me for an exact photo when you have all the info I have by looking at the AI reply I pasted?
Why would you reply something completely unconnected to begin with? Why not reply to the thread or make another one instead? Your comment was out of place and I viewed it in context.
No, it doesn't.
You assumed it. Read it again.
I challenged the photo, not you.
It's a question that assumes the photo is faked, which it turned out to be. It's a question that triggers people to understand that these photos are faked, and challenge those, who think they are not fake. And if someone argues about a photo that is not fake, I would answer the challenge.
And this argument would still be about the photo, not personal insults.
Because I don't work for you. I have my own thoughts and meaning behind my thoughts.
Congratulations on checking with AI, but that wasn't my point. Hasn't anyone conversed with you and suddenly changed the conversation to something they just thought about? If that hasn't happened to you, I can assure you, it's pretty common in conversations.
Because it's a challenge to the validity of the statement of the AI, that you provided. Again - not to you. The photo and the AI statement only.
I think you just mistook it for an insult, as I am personally challenging your comment. But I was challenging the information in your comment, and you had an AI statement there.
I think it was all just a misunderstanding. I don't judge you for that, I had many of those, and I know the shame that comes afterwards when I realized that I was in the wrong AFTER spewing so many insults towards the other person, believing that I am correct...
Once I was so ashamed that I deleted all my comments to hide how incorrect I was... Then I thought about it, and I knew it wasn't fair to insult the person, who actually just gave me the correct information... I wrote personally to this person to apologize, and to my surprise, he immediately forgave me... I was expecting insults, mockery, and all the things I was doing to him... Yet, this person understood and simply forgave me... I was even more ashamed of my actions after that, but I wanted to be like this person - generous in victory, not to shame someone in their defeat... I'd probably never forget this act of kindness. It really shocked me then, I really hope to return the favor to someone one day.