Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

11
Earff (media.scored.co)
posted 105 days ago by Dps1879 105 days ago by Dps1879 +15 / -4
67 comments share
67 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Neo1 1 point 98 days ago +1 / -0

Because the question assumed I had a specific photo in mind and that I wasn't sure if it's altered or not.

No, it doesn't.

You assumed it. Read it again.

Why ask me for an exact photo when you have all the info I have by looking at the AI reply I pasted?

I challenged the photo, not you.

It's a question that assumes the photo is faked, which it turned out to be. It's a question that triggers people to understand that these photos are faked, and challenge those, who think they are not fake. And if someone argues about a photo that is not fake, I would answer the challenge.

And this argument would still be about the photo, not personal insults.

Why would you reply something completely unconnected to begin with?

Because I don't work for you. I have my own thoughts and meaning behind my thoughts.

Congratulations on checking with AI, but that wasn't my point. Hasn't anyone conversed with you and suddenly changed the conversation to something they just thought about? If that hasn't happened to you, I can assure you, it's pretty common in conversations.

Why not reply to the thread or make another one instead?

Because it's a challenge to the validity of the statement of the AI, that you provided. Again - not to you. The photo and the AI statement only.

Your comment was out of place and I viewed it in context.

I think you just mistook it for an insult, as I am personally challenging your comment. But I was challenging the information in your comment, and you had an AI statement there.

I think it was all just a misunderstanding. I don't judge you for that, I had many of those, and I know the shame that comes afterwards when I realized that I was in the wrong AFTER spewing so many insults towards the other person, believing that I am correct...

Once I was so ashamed that I deleted all my comments to hide how incorrect I was... Then I thought about it, and I knew it wasn't fair to insult the person, who actually just gave me the correct information... I wrote personally to this person to apologize, and to my surprise, he immediately forgave me... I was expecting insults, mockery, and all the things I was doing to him... Yet, this person understood and simply forgave me... I was even more ashamed of my actions after that, but I wanted to be like this person - generous in victory, not to shame someone in their defeat... I'd probably never forget this act of kindness. It really shocked me then, I really hope to return the favor to someone one day.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 98 days ago +1 / -0

It's a question that triggers people to understand that these photos are faked, and challenge those, who think they are not fake. And if someone argues about a photo that is not fake, I would answer the challenge.

But you realize I'm not one of those people and you reply to me, not some abstract "other people", correct? So what am I to think in this case? It's reasonable to contextualize what you wrote the way I did.

It didn't help that your reply came right after the other guy saying "Omg, you're a gullible idiot" implying I agree with the AI.

I think it was all just a misunderstanding. I don't judge you for that, I had many of those, and I know the shame that comes afterwards when I realized that I was in the wrong AFTER spewing so many insults towards the other person, believing that I am correct...

Very gracious of you and nice try at gaslighting. You were the one who insulted me first though, unless you consider "I don't care" to be an insult. It seems you just had another one of those interactions you talk about, but you don't seem ashamed of it.

It really shocked me then, I really hope to return the favor to someone one day.

You had an opportunity to do so here but chose to act as if you have the moral high ground somehow. It's bizarre really.

But yes, it was a misunderstanding that didn't need to devolve into insults, I give you that. I'm sorry I stooped to your level and i apologize.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Neo1 1 point 97 days ago +1 / -0

"It didn't help that your reply came right after the other guy saying "Omg, you're a gullible idiot" implying I agree with the AI."

Never even saw that reply. But I understand how this contributed to our miscommunication.

"Very gracious of you and nice try at gaslighting. You were the one who insulted me first though, unless you consider "I don't care" to be an insult. It seems you just had another one of those interactions you talk about, but you don't seem ashamed of it."

There you go - lovely!

You talk about "gaslighting", huh? Let's explore:

My next comment was:

What a researcher you are... Tenacious, caring, intelligent...

Or probably not.

I'm gonna go with "probably not".

So, in your own mind, "probably not a tenactious, caring, intelligent researcher" is an insult?

You could've turned that "probably" to your own benefit. Am I wrong to doubt your abilities, even tho you proved my words later?

Now, it doesn't go into miscommunication. You took my sincerity and attacked me with it. But that backfired for you, didn't it? Or are you hoping that people will read only your reply and not mine... in the hope of... gaslighting me?

I so enjoy to crush my enemies with their own words... :D That's so satisfying, I can't even put it in words...


"You had an opportunity to do so here but chose to act as if you have the moral high ground somehow. It's bizarre really."

  • I shared my personal experience, and you didn't.

  • I opened myself to a cruel, vicious animal like you, only to be bitten by the rabid dog you really are...

I do have a moral high ground. And I know why a rabid dog would find that bizarre... :D


"But yes, it was a misunderstanding that didn't need to devolve into insults, I give you that. I'm sorry I stooped to your level and i apologize."

HA! "Stoop to my level"?

You said: "It didn't help that your reply came right after the other guy saying "Omg, you're a gullible idiot" implying I agree with the AI." IN THE SAME COMMENT!!! aahahahahahahahahah

:D

How dumb are you?

Actually, I will side with that comment accusing you of being a "gullible idiot". I wasn't aware of it, but I will go upvote it right now! This guy helped me out a lot!

Not you, you rabid dog - SmithW1984. You're a gullible idiot. Not only that. But you use someone opening themselves to you to attack them. How evil are you?

Satan can go on vacation with how well you react to people... I still pity the ones that know you in real life... Assuming you haven't killed them all already... Vicious, rabid dog, you... Go chase a bone, you abomination.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– SmithW1984 0 points 97 days ago +1 / -1

I don't have time for sophistry and jewish bs. Just look at the language you use and the names you call me. "Cry as they strike you" indeed. You're yet another proof how much protestantism is jewed up and demonically influenced.

So, in your own mind, "probably not a tenactious, caring, intelligent researcher" is an insult?

Yes, it's an insult. Make a poll and ask people if it is such if you're autistic enough not to realize. Have a nice day.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Neo1 1 point 96 days ago +1 / -0

But with all your insults and snowflake behavior, you have proved that my words are true.

I know you don't have time to read my long comments, because I know you're stupid. Mentally handicapped, if you will. It's what you really are, and you prove it with your arrogant and ignorant behavior.

Thank you for letting your ego help me to prove my point. :D

I really blame your parents tho... They never cared about you. That's why you have no respect and you act in this way...

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy