The post you made just has a guy going "I don't think that they made it in 1960." There's nothing else of substance. He gives no information, no details, just endless repetitions of "I don't think so, bruh"
The mom probably is doing all right with it though. She buries her head in the sand and will just divert the topic into insults if people don't say that she's right. Ignorance is bliss after all.
I know your Stockholm syndrome is acting up today, however, currently you're using your grade school given idea of evolving from cavemen. Stupid to smart. In the distant past we were very spiritual minded, the world we can't see now was where we lived before, but there was no freedom of choice, no individuality.
In order for the Creator to give us freedom of choice He had to create an impossible scenario. A false/foreign command/concept was given to Lucifer, he revolted because of this command and because we are the first to gain freedom of choice there was none up to that point, no one could stop the chain reaction and 1/3 of the beings below Lucifer were pulled astray along with him, including 1/3 of us. Only since Christ Jesus' Sacrifice have we been able to borrow the word I to call ourselves and gain strength from it to accomplish our activities.
The adversarial powers have removed the fact that our bodies and head evolved separately, they have hid the fact the man was a spiritual genius who would never stray from the path of good. For this was the only was for Man to have the ultimate freedom of choice. We must be dumbed and evil in the name of freedom of choice, now good is coming back, yet it won't redeem evil immediately, it will coexist, the earth it self rent in twain from the sadness that many have already chosen, so that all may see both sides and choose. When it's your time good luck!!!!
The evidence is there, you're just a dick or shill same difference to me. Can't tell them apart. I don't know why you would expect anything else; in this realm a lot of times you get the energy returned for what you sent out. That may be why it's so obvious to you how people will react.
Any photos of the gargantuan metal mold they used to cast this (which would have been all but if not completely impossible to remove from the concrete, and I know this because I've cast walls using wall forms for work for a while, and I gotta tell you, sometimes six pretty strong guys had a really hard time getting those forms off, we couldn't even tell we used form oil )
How did they remove the forms?
666 is man after he has failed to rise instead of continuing The Fall. 777 is the number of completion in time, therefore 666 implies a failure to reach the goal line. Hence why they say 666 is the number of the beast. Those humans who don't care to find the guide to the trail back to the Father with become 666 beasts, no longer "human" in the true sense of the word, they will be put in another category.
Word "tartar" is a greek word that means something close to "hell".
This have absolutely nothing to do with any nomads at all.
But it have everything with dishonesty of MiddleAge cartographers.
Mid-ages cartographers often draw "misterious" "Tartaia" (as literally Kingdom of Hell) on maps to attract buyers and pose themselves as like they know something about places they don't know shit about.
There also was and is Tatars, an old indo-european ethnos inhabitating region along and beyond Volga river where it merges with Kama river that become at some point Tatar kingdom that now is Tatarstan Republic in Russia. Tatars never was Asian looking. They are Turkich (Not as in Turks, Tatars have nothing to do with Turkey and never ever was even in Osman Empire, but as much larger ethnic family).
Asian looking was Mongols. At the time of Golden Horde Tatars took the side of Mongols after Mongols defeated their kingdom. So Golden Horde became known as Tatar-Mongol Horde.
Words "Tatar" and "Tartar" have absolutely nothing common at all, aside from similar letters. They are from completely different ancient languages and have completely different meaning.
"Tararia" on MidAge maps is a pure bullshit. On very few maps "Tartaria" kind of cover or touch place where real Tataria should be, but that's just a coincidence, because MidAges European cartographers was not aware about anything to the East of Novgorod in the best case.
"taRtar" and so "taRtaria" comes from ancient Greek language and means something like "hellish". Comes from mythology as name of location. It is mythological toponym.
"tatar" and "tataria" comes from ancient Turkic language and comes from the "tat" - "to pull", "to drag" because nomands dragged their belongings travelling. In Russian there even word "тащить" from the same origin, with same meaning - "to drag".
None of horse nomads named "taRtars" ever here.
That "taRtar" thing is purely European thing. Ancient Greek and Greek mythology was part of higher education in Europe in MidAges. So "taRtar" came into European culture along with ancient Greek literature. It was used to name something unknown and so horrible and intriguing. When some cartographer had no clue about some area on the map, he, being educated person often name that "terra incognita" as "TaRtaria". Obviously, people that should live in that fictional land named "TaRtars" by ignorant Europeans.
"TaRtaria" is exactly the same as "Atlantis", but unlike Atlantis scary and horrible. Mythical unknown land. Sometimes, due to ignorance, placed in the unknown to Europeans lands to the East of Volga river, to hide absence of real knowledge. That's it.
This is just wierd logic. The entire argument hangs on the meaning of the word tartar according to which language I don't know. It's silly that you can use that for some kind of connection with this theory must be debunked
drawing conclusions based on some etymology is weak evidence.
The entire theory of tartaria is based on seeing a word on a map? And you think your right about that? how does all the evidence of tartaria flow through you and you only see this strange conclusion
The people who believe are resourceful and do their own research. The evidence is out there for inquisitive minds to find. It's not my responsibility to convince you to be curious.
Go find groups on telegram or Facebook, whatever..that share evidence and make productive discussions.
I just think you're a bit lazy for no already knowing about tartaria evidence, I think you let your beliefs block you from acquiring new knowledge and wrote off the idea of tartaria too easily.
I'm not gonna link evidence for you to argue. Go find a group, fight with them or listen and learn, I don't mind either way
The evidence is out there and yet, how strange, everyone who believes this can never seem to pull any up!
Go find groups on telegram or Facebook, whatever..that share evidence and make productive discussions.
None do. They all do what you do. They say things like "I just think you're a bit lazy for no already knowing about tartaria evidence" and expect people to believe them right out the gate, and any critical questions get ignored. It's a shame really.
So, I don't know what you mean. You copied the common phase "case and point" and the provided a link to the same post. Loops? Ok ya, I get it. Giving up now
Have to agree. This is just one of many massive inconsistencies. Where are the accounts and photos of this being built?
If it was actually made in the 60s then there still should be people, articles, invoices, injuries, stories about the construction
Personally, I love these old world posts. There's so much we don't know about our past.
There are photos of it being constructed in about 1965...but I am sure photos mean nothing to weirdos that believe in giants...
https://vsuete.com/monument-motherland-calls-in-volgograd/
This is two photos and both show it already built. So, sorry, fail
So you didn't watch the post that explains that, your choice I guess.
The post you made just has a guy going "I don't think that they made it in 1960." There's nothing else of substance. He gives no information, no details, just endless repetitions of "I don't think so, bruh"
"Mommy, can you make me breakfast"
"Sorry, I'm too busy desperately avoiding any conversation that goes against my worldview! Also, your father left because you masturbate"
That must be pretty tough on you. My prayers are with you.
Oh I thought we were doing a scene.
The mom probably is doing all right with it though. She buries her head in the sand and will just divert the topic into insults if people don't say that she's right. Ignorance is bliss after all.
I know your Stockholm syndrome is acting up today, however, currently you're using your grade school given idea of evolving from cavemen. Stupid to smart. In the distant past we were very spiritual minded, the world we can't see now was where we lived before, but there was no freedom of choice, no individuality. In order for the Creator to give us freedom of choice He had to create an impossible scenario. A false/foreign command/concept was given to Lucifer, he revolted because of this command and because we are the first to gain freedom of choice there was none up to that point, no one could stop the chain reaction and 1/3 of the beings below Lucifer were pulled astray along with him, including 1/3 of us. Only since Christ Jesus' Sacrifice have we been able to borrow the word I to call ourselves and gain strength from it to accomplish our activities. The adversarial powers have removed the fact that our bodies and head evolved separately, they have hid the fact the man was a spiritual genius who would never stray from the path of good. For this was the only was for Man to have the ultimate freedom of choice. We must be dumbed and evil in the name of freedom of choice, now good is coming back, yet it won't redeem evil immediately, it will coexist, the earth it self rent in twain from the sadness that many have already chosen, so that all may see both sides and choose. When it's your time good luck!!!!
Yes....his suppositions are ridiculous. Stop this nonsense.
No....your studies are lagging. We were smarter by 1000x times and have been dumbed down, apparently some love and embrace it.
Evidence?
I remember the first time you saw a monster school bus. You were sooo cute
So no evidence then...just insults...par for the course.
The evidence is there, you're just a dick or shill same difference to me. Can't tell them apart. I don't know why you would expect anything else; in this realm a lot of times you get the energy returned for what you sent out. That may be why it's so obvious to you how people will react.
Any photos of the gargantuan metal mold they used to cast this (which would have been all but if not completely impossible to remove from the concrete, and I know this because I've cast walls using wall forms for work for a while, and I gotta tell you, sometimes six pretty strong guys had a really hard time getting those forms off, we couldn't even tell we used form oil ) How did they remove the forms?
I call bullshit
Wait until he finds out about how the Hoover Dam was made, or the Jefferson and Lincoln Memorials...
Dolt
Lol 666
Yep....666 - Nero...not some magical being with a pitchfork...
666 is man after he has failed to rise instead of continuing The Fall. 777 is the number of completion in time, therefore 666 implies a failure to reach the goal line. Hence why they say 666 is the number of the beast. Those humans who don't care to find the guide to the trail back to the Father with become 666 beasts, no longer "human" in the true sense of the word, they will be put in another category.
Nope...there is nothing magical about this...
Word "tartar" is a greek word that means something close to "hell".
This have absolutely nothing to do with any nomads at all.
But it have everything with dishonesty of MiddleAge cartographers.
Mid-ages cartographers often draw "misterious" "Tartaia" (as literally Kingdom of Hell) on maps to attract buyers and pose themselves as like they know something about places they don't know shit about.
There also was and is Tatars, an old indo-european ethnos inhabitating region along and beyond Volga river where it merges with Kama river that become at some point Tatar kingdom that now is Tatarstan Republic in Russia. Tatars never was Asian looking. They are Turkich (Not as in Turks, Tatars have nothing to do with Turkey and never ever was even in Osman Empire, but as much larger ethnic family).
Asian looking was Mongols. At the time of Golden Horde Tatars took the side of Mongols after Mongols defeated their kingdom. So Golden Horde became known as Tatar-Mongol Horde.
Words "Tatar" and "Tartar" have absolutely nothing common at all, aside from similar letters. They are from completely different ancient languages and have completely different meaning.
"Tararia" on MidAge maps is a pure bullshit. On very few maps "Tartaria" kind of cover or touch place where real Tataria should be, but that's just a coincidence, because MidAges European cartographers was not aware about anything to the East of Novgorod in the best case.
Again.
None of horse nomads named "taRtars" ever here.
That "taRtar" thing is purely European thing. Ancient Greek and Greek mythology was part of higher education in Europe in MidAges. So "taRtar" came into European culture along with ancient Greek literature. It was used to name something unknown and so horrible and intriguing. When some cartographer had no clue about some area on the map, he, being educated person often name that "terra incognita" as "TaRtaria". Obviously, people that should live in that fictional land named "TaRtars" by ignorant Europeans.
"TaRtaria" is exactly the same as "Atlantis", but unlike Atlantis scary and horrible. Mythical unknown land. Sometimes, due to ignorance, placed in the unknown to Europeans lands to the East of Volga river, to hide absence of real knowledge. That's it.
You are literally claiming that people are idiots for their ability to read a map.
https://iask.ai/q/Tartaria-location-on-modern-map-s4qcc5g
Were you distracted by the link? Here, allow me to repeat myself; You are literally claiming that people are idiots for their ability to read a map.
Here is my argument:
The land is on the maps.
This is just wierd logic. The entire argument hangs on the meaning of the word tartar according to which language I don't know. It's silly that you can use that for some kind of connection with this theory must be debunked
drawing conclusions based on some etymology is weak evidence.
The entire theory of tartaria is based on seeing a word on a map? And you think your right about that? how does all the evidence of tartaria flow through you and you only see this strange conclusion
The people who believe are resourceful and do their own research. The evidence is out there for inquisitive minds to find. It's not my responsibility to convince you to be curious.
Go find groups on telegram or Facebook, whatever..that share evidence and make productive discussions.
I just think you're a bit lazy for no already knowing about tartaria evidence, I think you let your beliefs block you from acquiring new knowledge and wrote off the idea of tartaria too easily.
I'm not gonna link evidence for you to argue. Go find a group, fight with them or listen and learn, I don't mind either way
The evidence is out there and yet, how strange, everyone who believes this can never seem to pull any up!
None do. They all do what you do. They say things like "I just think you're a bit lazy for no already knowing about tartaria evidence" and expect people to believe them right out the gate, and any critical questions get ignored. It's a shame really.
Because you don't know how to find any
So, I don't know what you mean. You copied the common phase "case and point" and the provided a link to the same post. Loops? Ok ya, I get it. Giving up now
If you know everything you should make a post