The people who believe are resourceful and do their own research. The evidence is out there for inquisitive minds to find. It's not my responsibility to convince you to be curious.
Go find groups on telegram or Facebook, whatever..that share evidence and make productive discussions.
I just think you're a bit lazy for no already knowing about tartaria evidence, I think you let your beliefs block you from acquiring new knowledge and wrote off the idea of tartaria too easily.
I'm not gonna link evidence for you to argue. Go find a group, fight with them or listen and learn, I don't mind either way
The evidence is out there and yet, how strange, everyone who believes this can never seem to pull any up!
Go find groups on telegram or Facebook, whatever..that share evidence and make productive discussions.
None do. They all do what you do. They say things like "I just think you're a bit lazy for no already knowing about tartaria evidence" and expect people to believe them right out the gate, and any critical questions get ignored. It's a shame really.
So, I don't know what you mean. You copied the common phase "case and point" and the provided a link to the same post. Loops? Ok ya, I get it. Giving up now
Oh, didn't know you were trying to point out a comment to make your "case and point"
"Here is my argument:
The land is on the maps. "
Sounds like a half assed person or someone who is tired of explaining it to people who won't listen or aren't respectful or aren't resourceful enough to bring what they have learned from researching their counter argument to the table
The arrogant shithead here, who expect me to prove my fucking argument, sound like reddit libtards. This is discussion. For people who debate. If you have ever done real debate or taken college level law, you would know it's your responsibility to be know your opponents arguments before they make them. Not learn while debating. You're idea of debate is an order of magnitude off from being considered intellectual, at least it would be in my circles.
Look, I know stubborn when I see it. You, this guy, aren't genuinely interested in growing knowledge. You're a bit curious but still heavy programed and this guy is liberal style, believes what resonates with him. Or her. Whatever 🤣
In life, I don't give up. Here I don't either. But I'm not so stupid as to waste time with people who would rather argue than learn
The people who believe are resourceful and do their own research. The evidence is out there for inquisitive minds to find. It's not my responsibility to convince you to be curious.
Go find groups on telegram or Facebook, whatever..that share evidence and make productive discussions.
I just think you're a bit lazy for no already knowing about tartaria evidence, I think you let your beliefs block you from acquiring new knowledge and wrote off the idea of tartaria too easily.
I'm not gonna link evidence for you to argue. Go find a group, fight with them or listen and learn, I don't mind either way
The evidence is out there and yet, how strange, everyone who believes this can never seem to pull any up!
None do. They all do what you do. They say things like "I just think you're a bit lazy for no already knowing about tartaria evidence" and expect people to believe them right out the gate, and any critical questions get ignored. It's a shame really.
Because you don't know how to find any
So, I don't know what you mean. You copied the common phase "case and point" and the provided a link to the same post. Loops? Ok ya, I get it. Giving up now
Oh, didn't know you were trying to point out a comment to make your "case and point"
"Here is my argument: The land is on the maps. "
Sounds like a half assed person or someone who is tired of explaining it to people who won't listen or aren't respectful or aren't resourceful enough to bring what they have learned from researching their counter argument to the table
The arrogant shithead here, who expect me to prove my fucking argument, sound like reddit libtards. This is discussion. For people who debate. If you have ever done real debate or taken college level law, you would know it's your responsibility to be know your opponents arguments before they make them. Not learn while debating. You're idea of debate is an order of magnitude off from being considered intellectual, at least it would be in my circles.
Giving up is your usual MO
Look, I know stubborn when I see it. You, this guy, aren't genuinely interested in growing knowledge. You're a bit curious but still heavy programed and this guy is liberal style, believes what resonates with him. Or her. Whatever 🤣
In life, I don't give up. Here I don't either. But I'm not so stupid as to waste time with people who would rather argue than learn