So, I don't know what you mean. You copied the common phase "case and point" and the provided a link to the same post. Loops? Ok ya, I get it. Giving up now
Oh, didn't know you were trying to point out a comment to make your "case and point"
"Here is my argument:
The land is on the maps. "
Sounds like a half assed person or someone who is tired of explaining it to people who won't listen or aren't respectful or aren't resourceful enough to bring what they have learned from researching their counter argument to the table
The arrogant shithead here, who expect me to prove my fucking argument, sound like reddit libtards. This is discussion. For people who debate. If you have ever done real debate or taken college level law, you would know it's your responsibility to be know your opponents arguments before they make them. Not learn while debating. You're idea of debate is an order of magnitude off from being considered intellectual, at least it would be in my circles.
You caught that. Nice. I have lost patience, and just blurt out shit that probably makes no sense.
This theory doesn't get traction until you reject the history of this world as taught to us since we were children. Ya, that's hard. But once you realize where we are not, it makes things like Tartaria seem much more viable.
I mean, to believe in the children trains of the 1860s, or that some old buildings from that time might not actually have been build by hand tools, horses and buggies. You first have to firmly test your own observation and reasoning skills against the theory that the earth is a globe. It's the root of all conspiracies and you can't understand things without it. Like evolution, it's bullshit, but not because the bible said so. Because this place isn't a rock floating in space for billions of years.
Then you may start to question dinosaurs and it makes the cover up of giants appear more viable. And things like Tartaria, old maps that describe the world in a totally different climate that doesn't agree with mainstream history.
Sorry that you feel like no one is helping you, but no one helped me either. I used telegram groups to get exposed to the ideas, then had discussions with people while assuming the position of student, and I learned a lot of people are wrong, but there are still things they are right about.
There are lots more videos and images you can find. Showing buildings and talking about them from a logical point....like Palais Garnier and other huge glass buildings in Paris, long before any glass manufacturing existed, if you believe GPT, it was all supplied by various small glass makers all over France, huge precision glass sheets by the thousands.
There are so many examples of building, especially in the US ( not even Tartaria) that were emaculate and yet, the population was too small, the tools didn't exist, no means to transport massive blocks of rock or hoist them up, especially while the people were simple folk, just settling a new part of America, they wouldn't build an opera house.
You have think critically to cut through the fake flat earth lies. Because behind it is just obvious truth and you can put it together yourself, never have to believe anyone, no citations needed, just study the curvature intently, figure out if it really curves or not. Or if you like physics, think about the velocity and forces that "move the planet". We would feel it, but you have to draw out the velocity vectors and think. Too often people just accept fake science because they were introduced to it when they were very young. Like germ theory or globe theory or democracy.
We have to test ourselves, don't expect anyone to teach you. You're probably just like me, too certain of myself to be retaught the foundations of my reality. But here I am today, not calling myself a flat earther, because that shit is for psy ops, but an ex- glober or true earther.
Once I realized where we are not, it made tartaria a much more viable theory, and I kept digging. But it's full of fake shit and holes. You have to know this is part of the psy op to throw us off. It's a min field of truths and fake truths to keep the water muddy and dissuade the normies who dare to look into it.
Sorry I'm not going to share links and groups, I have good ones too, but the fed here just target them for removal
Look, I know stubborn when I see it. You, this guy, aren't genuinely interested in growing knowledge. You're a bit curious but still heavy programed and this guy is liberal style, believes what resonates with him. Or her. Whatever 🤣
In life, I don't give up. Here I don't either. But I'm not so stupid as to waste time with people who would rather argue than learn
Of course I'm interested in gaining knowledge. What startles me is that every flat earth believer I speak to is so reluctant to share knowledge
If the world is flat, why do you want it to be some big secret? Why do you shy away from giving basic answers to questions about the world? Why are you so reluctant to have a rational discussion about it, under the guise of "oh I'm just so busy"?
You are giving up. It's what you do.
I'm more than happy to learn. You just expect learning to mean I believe everything you say. Asking questions is the best way to learn.
So, I don't know what you mean. You copied the common phase "case and point" and the provided a link to the same post. Loops? Ok ya, I get it. Giving up now
Oh, didn't know you were trying to point out a comment to make your "case and point"
"Here is my argument: The land is on the maps. "
Sounds like a half assed person or someone who is tired of explaining it to people who won't listen or aren't respectful or aren't resourceful enough to bring what they have learned from researching their counter argument to the table
The arrogant shithead here, who expect me to prove my fucking argument, sound like reddit libtards. This is discussion. For people who debate. If you have ever done real debate or taken college level law, you would know it's your responsibility to be know your opponents arguments before they make them. Not learn while debating. You're idea of debate is an order of magnitude off from being considered intellectual, at least it would be in my circles.
You caught that. Nice. I have lost patience, and just blurt out shit that probably makes no sense.
This theory doesn't get traction until you reject the history of this world as taught to us since we were children. Ya, that's hard. But once you realize where we are not, it makes things like Tartaria seem much more viable.
I mean, to believe in the children trains of the 1860s, or that some old buildings from that time might not actually have been build by hand tools, horses and buggies. You first have to firmly test your own observation and reasoning skills against the theory that the earth is a globe. It's the root of all conspiracies and you can't understand things without it. Like evolution, it's bullshit, but not because the bible said so. Because this place isn't a rock floating in space for billions of years.
Then you may start to question dinosaurs and it makes the cover up of giants appear more viable. And things like Tartaria, old maps that describe the world in a totally different climate that doesn't agree with mainstream history.
Sorry that you feel like no one is helping you, but no one helped me either. I used telegram groups to get exposed to the ideas, then had discussions with people while assuming the position of student, and I learned a lot of people are wrong, but there are still things they are right about.
There are lots more videos and images you can find. Showing buildings and talking about them from a logical point....like Palais Garnier and other huge glass buildings in Paris, long before any glass manufacturing existed, if you believe GPT, it was all supplied by various small glass makers all over France, huge precision glass sheets by the thousands.
There are so many examples of building, especially in the US ( not even Tartaria) that were emaculate and yet, the population was too small, the tools didn't exist, no means to transport massive blocks of rock or hoist them up, especially while the people were simple folk, just settling a new part of America, they wouldn't build an opera house.
You have think critically to cut through the fake flat earth lies. Because behind it is just obvious truth and you can put it together yourself, never have to believe anyone, no citations needed, just study the curvature intently, figure out if it really curves or not. Or if you like physics, think about the velocity and forces that "move the planet". We would feel it, but you have to draw out the velocity vectors and think. Too often people just accept fake science because they were introduced to it when they were very young. Like germ theory or globe theory or democracy.
We have to test ourselves, don't expect anyone to teach you. You're probably just like me, too certain of myself to be retaught the foundations of my reality. But here I am today, not calling myself a flat earther, because that shit is for psy ops, but an ex- glober or true earther.
Once I realized where we are not, it made tartaria a much more viable theory, and I kept digging. But it's full of fake shit and holes. You have to know this is part of the psy op to throw us off. It's a min field of truths and fake truths to keep the water muddy and dissuade the normies who dare to look into it.
Sorry I'm not going to share links and groups, I have good ones too, but the fed here just target them for removal
Giving up is your usual MO
Look, I know stubborn when I see it. You, this guy, aren't genuinely interested in growing knowledge. You're a bit curious but still heavy programed and this guy is liberal style, believes what resonates with him. Or her. Whatever 🤣
In life, I don't give up. Here I don't either. But I'm not so stupid as to waste time with people who would rather argue than learn
Of course I'm interested in gaining knowledge. What startles me is that every flat earth believer I speak to is so reluctant to share knowledge
If the world is flat, why do you want it to be some big secret? Why do you shy away from giving basic answers to questions about the world? Why are you so reluctant to have a rational discussion about it, under the guise of "oh I'm just so busy"?
You are giving up. It's what you do.
I'm more than happy to learn. You just expect learning to mean I believe everything you say. Asking questions is the best way to learn.