I have a rule that if someone is reduced to claiming, "It's real!" without immediately supplying supporting evidence. that is the final confirmation necessary that it is, in fact, not real.
I'll now be adding a new rule that if someone is reduced to claiming, "It's a psyop!" without immediately supplying supporting evidence, that is the final confirmation that it is, in fact, not a psyop.
I think my simple point was that claims made without any supporting argumentation should be immediately discarded. So instantly posting yet another one as some sort of support for the previous? An notable display.
I seem to be having quite a lot of trouble getting these ideas through. Maybe these ideas are not as simple to others as they appear to me.
You know how much shit we've been right about before the evidence ever came out?
Now go do something better with your life than thinking you're smarter than people who think critically and don't need an authority figure to tell them what's true and what's not
Who is this "we" for which you're speaking? And do you claim to be an authority figure for in this group? Jesus, the shills get stupider and more obvious all the time.
Now go do something better with your life
Wow, the refutations and slams literally write themselves.
Quite obviously, yeah.
Most important is to make the American people trust trump so the rug pull is harmful to as many people as possible
No, Donald Trump is obviously a man of principal who, despite their long history of supporting American, cannot tolerate Israeli chicanery.
Lol
Ancient psyop possibly
Theatre
I have a rule that if someone is reduced to claiming, "It's real!" without immediately supplying supporting evidence. that is the final confirmation necessary that it is, in fact, not real.
I'll now be adding a new rule that if someone is reduced to claiming, "It's a psyop!" without immediately supplying supporting evidence, that is the final confirmation that it is, in fact, not a psyop.
Isreal...
Neat. But, yeah, their 'dispute' is BS.
I think my simple point was that claims made without any supporting argumentation should be immediately discarded. So instantly posting yet another one as some sort of support for the previous? An notable display.
I seem to be having quite a lot of trouble getting these ideas through. Maybe these ideas are not as simple to others as they appear to me.
Dude, you're in a conspiracy theory community
You know how much shit we've been right about before the evidence ever came out?
Now go do something better with your life than thinking you're smarter than people who think critically and don't need an authority figure to tell them what's true and what's not
No, he's right, dude.
No matter how good the news looks, or doesn't look, proof is required these days on all counts.
But you do you, don't require any sources and keep thinking Hillary is going to Gitmo or whatever they are floating nowadays...
The cognitive dissonance on display in this comment is really hilarious.
Who is this "we" for which you're speaking? And do you claim to be an authority figure for in this group? Jesus, the shills get stupider and more obvious all the time.
Wow, the refutations and slams literally write themselves.
Opinion/opinari/op - "to choose"...any jewish opinion implies an option for each gentile to ignore ones choice for a chosen ones optional opinion.
Taking an option binds ones free will of choice to the opinion of another ones free will of choice.
In reality...each beings free will of choice implies an optional essence (life) within the necessity of nature (inception towards death).
If one allies self to another one, then one ignores being within ALL, hence not allied/alligare - "bind to", but freed from one another.
Isreal/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies ones resistance within all...not ones alliance with any other one.
A chosen one cannot have an ally without contradicting ones choice by binding it to another.