Working on a new software project with a Jewish guy. I've had bad experiences with some before, but this guy actually seems pretty cool. Hopefully he doesn't try to hack me on behalf of Mossad.
For all I know he could already be a born again Christian, so I'm not going to judge.
I've worked with one for years he is one of the nicest guys I know. Most people are good.
There is a big difference between acting good and being good.
Most of the people I'd trust my life with are totally anti-social.
I wouldn't go that far. Most people aren't Jeffrey Damer level evil, but they are bad enough that they (we) are worthy of the world they're in.
📸 neat!
Most Jews I've met IRL have been fine people, really -- all about dat Torah. As small a part of the world's population as they are, they are like protestants, with many different sects, and splits within those sects.
Dr. Z was very Jewish, but was a real life hero, in his last few years. He didn't fall from the same tree as the Berghensteins we see EVERY SINGLE TIME. It's going to be bad for the decent Jews, as the gratuitous state support for Israel, war to bulldoze the Kazar homeland to be rebuilt, and fight against, "anti-Semitism," causes an explosive growth in noticing.
I have no solution, and for all I know the alright ones are a minority. But, the Talmudist types seem dead set on WWIII, and making every developed nation turn into ca 1930 Weimar, for whatever reason. Good luck with the consequences.
Weimar leads to dictatorship, which is what the Beast ultimately wants. People will beg for a fascist type dictator to purge society.
If said dictator wants to the purge the Fed, our judiciary, and the traitors in Congress. As a small start, he might be worth a chance. Especially if he's not prone to stimulant addictions.
Mustache man was involved with Bolsheviks, and knew their game. Learning what school never taught, he really didn't seem all that bad, until he became a speed junkie.
And unlike then, we now have a latge portion of the fighting age population against Israel and globalists, and young men shifting strongly right. If they try it, in the US, once the draft attempts come, I don't think it'll work. If a grass roots one comes up, though, it could make for a good time to water the liberty tree.
IMO, the big issue there will be how biological warfare by big corporations, and kill bots, change things, in the coming years.
Either way, this leader that people will think is grass roots will just lead to the end times system they've been pushing for.
How many times do we need to elect a supposed "outsider" looking to "change" things only to see they follow the same globalist script? They could even turn on the Jews, and you will still find they follow the overarching plan.
I used to work in Manhattan in a company almost entirely filled and ran by jews. Very nice people on the surface. Yet, while many people in life will try to screw you over, I've never met a jew, no matter how nice they acted, that wouldn't let you overpay them or in some other way cheat you.
Everyone generally tries to be 'nice', that's only a measure of socialization and motivation to be accepted by peers.
Bunch of kikes in this thread.
I've had good experiences and interactions with most Jews in the past. Judge each individual separately regardless of race or heritage.
I think a lot of them are arrogant pricks. When your cultural foundation is rooted in the Talmud it's a bad start.
Among people in my life who have randomly just insulted me (not in a friendly way), it's been either fags or Jews in the vast majority of cases. I think out of jealousy, because they are prima donnas and I was brighter than them. Very covetous people.
And too many of them are Marxist. In my experience the cool ones are the right leaning libertarian types. They don't bow to Marx or Israel so they can actually be decent Americans.
I will definitely agree that they are arrogant, but then again, a lot of people are
Arrogant/arrogare - "to claim for oneself"...a lot of people contradicts that which one claims for oneself. The suggestions of others tempting ones consent to make a claim implies the casting of lots, and suggesting few collectivizing the consent of many together becomes "a lot of people".
Within such a collective the singular becomes arrogant of self and contemptuous towards one another, which is what few utilize to steer collectives against one another.
If agreement could be definite (affixed); then why does disagreement exits? What if it's ones will that is being tricked to hold onto either side, which keeps both sides in perpetual conflict against one another?
True. And Lord knows I was a sinner too.
Although the hate I saw more of was after I was repentant and turning from my old ways. I don't think the devils liked that.
Christen implies "to anoint"...suggested baptism represents a ritual to wash off the original anointment. A trick.
a) Ware/waru/wer - "to perceive"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ware
b) New implies a suggestion; projection implies ones perception within all perceivable.
Working with another implies willfully joining...why hack apart what willingly holds together?