Do you believe in the theory that they inverted history and that the dark ages may have actually been a golden era? It's sort of similar to the Millenial Reign theory in which theologists claim Jesus ALREADY came back and reigned for 1000 years and the immaculate architecture is proof but that recently in the last couple hundreds years they've been trying to destroy and erase the ruins and evidence. Paul Stobbs talks about it https://www.bitchute.com/video/Oi5peb4MfDQj
That's exactly the case. The first millennia AD with Christianity taking over the dirty pagan idol worshipers and human sacrificers was the golden era where Christ ruled through His Church. This are the times of the Christian monarchies, when jews (the servants of Satan) were kept at bay and the 1000 years Rev. 20 talks about:
The Saints Reign with Christ 1,000 Years
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was committed to them. Then I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their witness to Jesus and for the word of God, who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received his mark on their foreheads or on their hands. And they lived and reigned with Christ for [a]a thousand years. 5 But the rest of the dead did not live again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. 6 Blessed and holy is he who has part in the first resurrection. Over such the second death has no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with Him a thousand years.
We are now in the end of the next 1000 years where Satan has dominion (hence the split of the Church in 1054, the many false teachings and ramping up of all the demonic shit in the formerly Christian world):
Satanic Rebellion Crushed
7 Now when the thousand years have expired, Satan will be released from his prison 8 and will go out to deceive the nations which are in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle, whose number is as the sand of the sea. 9 They went up on the breadth of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city. And fire came down from God out of heaven and devoured them. 10 The devil, who deceived them, was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone where[b] the beast and the false prophet are. And they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.
It's obvious why the antichrists will invert history and call the golden era of light "dark ages" and the degenerate spiritually dark last times the "age of progress and enlightenment". And it makes total sense why antichristians like OP adopt this worldview. I was through the same rebellion phase myself.
Most history books assume a secular enlightenment view and prop up atheistic propagandists like Voltaire (who came up with the phrase Dark Ages btw). Later, commie jews like Berthold Brecht also heavily criticized the RCC and the Inquisition and were instrumental for disseminating false narratives to the public. "Your side" are degenerate revolutionaries (mostly jewish) who fought against traditional society for the sake of a "liberal" NWO (in reality, a technocratic beast-system regime). They are known as libtards today and their ideology is pushed by tptb (see USAID for reference). I don't believe RCC is the true Church but what you present is a false dialectic where both sides are really bad. Criticizing what's wrong doesn't necessarily make you right.
But now that you live in a mostly secularized world ruled by the Science and not in the barbarous Dark ages, you can reap all its fruits it offers. It must be a blast, right? Here's what winning looks like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qIVROtHSck
b) A peon implies a debtor held by his creditor, yet it's gentiles who give creed/credit; while taking on jewish debt.
c) To usurp implies "seizing without right"...a gentile giving creed/credit to a jew; while taking jewish debt into possession usurps oneself from being within (life) right of passage (inception towards death).
d) Nature cannot be seized aka ones perception cannot seize all perceivable...trying to seize the suggestions by one another establishes seizure within self, which in return permits others upon (epi) seizure (lepsis).
The jewish concept of a golem/golum/goyim implies jewish control from outside (by suggestion) of what a gentile seizes within self (by consent). Consenting to a suggestion establish a conflict of reason among gentiles about seized suggestions by a jew, which implies an "epi-leptic-shock".
Utilizing implication (if/then) instead of reason (versus) prevents "shock".
Withdrawing consent from suggestion prevents "epi"
Adapting to perceivable instead of seizing suggested prevents "leptic"
Do you believe in the theory that they inverted history and that the dark ages may have actually been a golden era? It's sort of similar to the Millenial Reign theory in which theologists claim Jesus ALREADY came back and reigned for 1000 years and the immaculate architecture is proof but that recently in the last couple hundreds years they've been trying to destroy and erase the ruins and evidence. Paul Stobbs talks about it https://www.bitchute.com/video/Oi5peb4MfDQj
That's exactly the case. The first millennia AD with Christianity taking over the dirty pagan idol worshipers and human sacrificers was the golden era where Christ ruled through His Church. This are the times of the Christian monarchies, when jews (the servants of Satan) were kept at bay and the 1000 years Rev. 20 talks about:
We are now in the end of the next 1000 years where Satan has dominion (hence the split of the Church in 1054, the many false teachings and ramping up of all the demonic shit in the formerly Christian world):
It's obvious why the antichrists will invert history and call the golden era of light "dark ages" and the degenerate spiritually dark last times the "age of progress and enlightenment". And it makes total sense why antichristians like OP adopt this worldview. I was through the same rebellion phase myself.
Historians love whitewashing Jewish history.
Most history books assume a secular enlightenment view and prop up atheistic propagandists like Voltaire (who came up with the phrase Dark Ages btw). Later, commie jews like Berthold Brecht also heavily criticized the RCC and the Inquisition and were instrumental for disseminating false narratives to the public. "Your side" are degenerate revolutionaries (mostly jewish) who fought against traditional society for the sake of a "liberal" NWO (in reality, a technocratic beast-system regime). They are known as libtards today and their ideology is pushed by tptb (see USAID for reference). I don't believe RCC is the true Church but what you present is a false dialectic where both sides are really bad. Criticizing what's wrong doesn't necessarily make you right.
But now that you live in a mostly secularized world ruled by the Science and not in the barbarous Dark ages, you can reap all its fruits it offers. It must be a blast, right? Here's what winning looks like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qIVROtHSck
The entire idea of the "dark ages" itself is a giant conspiracy. All made up by "enlightenment" figures high on their own superiority complex.
a) European aka EU R O PEAN (you are a peon)
b) A peon implies a debtor held by his creditor, yet it's gentiles who give creed/credit; while taking on jewish debt.
c) To usurp implies "seizing without right"...a gentile giving creed/credit to a jew; while taking jewish debt into possession usurps oneself from being within (life) right of passage (inception towards death).
d) Nature cannot be seized aka ones perception cannot seize all perceivable...trying to seize the suggestions by one another establishes seizure within self, which in return permits others upon (epi) seizure (lepsis).
The jewish concept of a golem/golum/goyim implies jewish control from outside (by suggestion) of what a gentile seizes within self (by consent). Consenting to a suggestion establish a conflict of reason among gentiles about seized suggestions by a jew, which implies an "epi-leptic-shock".