I think I've found the dumbest application of Special Relativity
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
He says its neutral in his frame but not in the cats frame because the cat is moving with the electrons. But by that same logic the electrons should be contracted in his frame, which he conveniently ignores.
LOL then you have this comment which receives 200+ likes to "explain" this apparent contradiction:
Apparently space is being contracted in the cat's frame but not in the lab frame. Just complete idiocy
He's just juxtaposing concepts against each other, and then claiming cause and effect. There is no way of deconstructing his logic where none exists.
General relativity is dumb. It deals with subjective perception and not objective states and universals as if reality is ultimately relative and not absolute. But if that's true, then general relativity itself is subjective and not always the case, i.e. it's not a universal natural law like Newtonian mechanics. It's just as stupid as all relativism like saying "All truth is relative", which is a performative contradiction.
Do objects behave differently when you observe them and does your observation change the actual physical reality (whatup Schrodinger)? This is some magical kabbalah thinking for ya. There's a small bridge to cross between this and the troons making up their own reality because everything is relative to their subjective perception. Is it any wonder the jew Einstein came up with such nonsense? Jewed-up physics par excellence and normies (even high IQ science spergs) fall for it.
"Your truth" is the truth. Because, spacetime.
Spacetime is the fabric of the universe that somehow knows your relative velocity to something stationary and then changes reality only for you.
Imagine how many academia nerds believe this. And normies talk about the medieval period as the "Dark ages" of superstition and ignorance. People are too stupid and degenerate now to understand the vast knowledge and wisdom their predecessors possessed. Once again Christianity is proven correct - rejection of God makes one an irrational fool who falls for absurdities. We're the retarded children of kings. This is the ultimate Dunning-Kruger effect.'
Btw, wtf is "spacetime" made of? It has to be some material to make sense in a materialist worldview? It is claimed to have all the properties of material and it's always demonstrated by some piece of fabric that bends when a heavy object is placed on it. Is it something like magical fairy dust? It's all myth building and stupid ass rhetoric which has nothing to do with true science.
What is time relative to then?
Newtonian mechanics is limited to the natural world obviously and Newton doesn't make claims about metaphysics. The problem with relativity and any modern "theory of everything" is that it rejects metaphysics on one hand but delves deep into it and tries to explain metaphysical concepts through physics (dark matter, ultimate nature of reality, the nature of time and space, causality beginning and ending of the universe, black holes). It has transgressed its limitations and went into philosophy and religion territory. This explains why much of modern science is tied to occult practices and movements like Thelema and theosophy (look at the origins of NASA and what Jack Parsons did).
Most scientismo spergs don't even realize this because they have zero knowledge of anything outside their field and think philosophy is a bunch of gobbledygook.
But I agree that general relativity can have some application. It's usefulness and profundity is vastly overstated though.
I don't know if relativity -- or at least its popular adoption -- was some plot to lead people away from real science (as Alan Watt used to say) or if in fact it is a purely cult like phenomena, but either way seeing the absurd conclusions relativists come up with continues to amaze me.
In this video science youtuber Veritsium tells us that magnetism is a product of length contraction.
Just when I thought that theory can't get any dumber.
Sorry to be irrelevant, but is this the same guy that was the rep. in the lobby in The Big Short?
SR is a hoax. So many scientists have successfully disproved it. Try to find content that debunks relatively and see if you can agree or not
Nah, just look at the GPS clock rate compared to the clocks on earth. The clocks on earth run slower because they are being accelerated (gravity) than the clocks in space orbiting at 18,000 miles an hour.
They use half of what SR would call for, thus invalidating SR by omission.
Relativists try to justify the asymmetry in time dilation by saying "orbit is non-inertial and SR deals with inertial frames". That also invalidates the original argument then.
No, the difference is gravity is an accelerating force vs a constant speed of the orbiting craft.
It is the acceleration that causes the time dilation.
Time is slower at the bottom of a gravity well.
Two different effects. Effects due to different gravitational potential and effects due to velocity.
You're conflating the two. SR deals with velocity and not acceleration.
You are correct, they are different effects.
The salient point is that Time is Relative. Einstein's/Maxwell's equations predict the effects exactly.
Lol, 🤣