Cooking oils used by millions linked to cancer in second study in a week
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
You will find sweeteners in nearly all corporation food. It is not easy to find a soda can without sweetener. Also, AFAIK industry use mostly high-fructose corn syrup as "sugar".
As for anti-sugar propaganda, it targets mostly alt communities, like vegans, natural food eaters and so on, average customer already buy products with lowered glucose content.
As for insulin connected disfunctions - it is in no way sugar fault. Insuline system in humans can't be damaged by product it is designed to process. It damaged by other stuff either from aside, either by processing things it is not designed for, like high-fructose natural sugar replacements.
As I wrote multiple times, without any result, however, fructose rich things are harmful for humans. Not only because of lower glucose content, and so lower energy available to the brain, but also because it kickstart rudimentary hibernation mechanisms in human body with all consequences.
The goal of anti-sugar propaganda among alt communities, is to lower glucose consumption. They already did that with average customer, but there still noticeable amount of people that still get enough glucose for normal brain activity.
Technically, you can't make thin film from low-grade plastic. It is opposite, really, you need higher-grade plastic to make cheaper thinwall containers or coatings. That is why plastic bag last longer in nature than some thick solid, say hanger hook made from same PE. When you pressure cast some thick plastic thing, you could use much weaker and cheaper plastic to make a firm enough thing, unlike when you need to make an endless, defect-free film.
BPA is used for making polycarbonate, polyvinylchloride and epoxy, and I can't remember I ever met plastic packing for food made from PC, PVC or epoxy based plastics. IDK, may be that's some local phenomenon, but I don't remember PC/PVC/epoxy food packing in EU either.
PE, PET and PETG, as PS, not even talking about PP, PTFE, PU and PLA don't need BPA for manufacturing, and in most cases it will fuck the process. Meanwhile that is why PC or PVC in plastic garbage could make it reprocessing impossible.
Epoxy is important plastic, but it is hard to imagine it in anything that have relation to the food.
PS and ABS have stirol/styrene that is not very healthy, but it is not BPA.
It's just chemistry, you can't make PET bottle, or PE coated paper cup if there is some BPA added in process.
All in all probability to meet BPA in food packaging is close to zero.
So why that BPA-in-food hype is over all google? It is suspicious at least.
They used lead pipes and a lot of other shit. Plastic in nowhere near heavy metals and stuff in harm.
Just write "microplastics is harmful" in google and you will get tons of articles of how microplastics a severe threat to humanity. Change that to "vaccines is harmful" and you will not find any relevant article, in the best case you will find something about "minor side effects".
Guess why is that?
Yeah, they did a poor job of it then. High fructose corn syrup is 50% glucose. People eat carbs that get metabolized to glucose and drink sugar in excess. There's little difference between eating doughy foods and eating plain sugar because starch gets metabolized by the enzymes of your saliva almost instantaneously. So the last thing you should worry about is people not getting enough glucose.
If you're going to advocate for any kind of sugar it should be honey or fruit derived sugar which is fructose - this is the sugar our ancestors ate and they did it in moderation. Refined sugar is a industrial era invention.
It's not real competition. Do you realize the same corporations run both industries so that they can't loose? It's the same with the "anti-tabbacco propaganda" or the "green energy propaganda" ran by the very corporations that provide the "healthy" alternative. I thought this method of market control is well understood by people here since everyone knows how fake and gay political rivalries are and that Blackrock and Vanguard have majority shares in every industry.
Not to mention the whole "they don't want you eating sugar" makes no sense and you have to drum up ridiculous narratives about how lack of carbs makes weak and your brain not working properly. This is just dietary ignorance because fats and proteins get metabolized into a source of energy and can fully substitute carbs (not the other way around). If your theory were true, people on keto diets would be in a really rough state and borderline retarded and the opposite is observed.
So because they spin false narratives about vaccines then everything must be false? That's a non sequitur and the red-pilled rookie fallacy - "everything is fake, dude, it's all lies upon lies" (not calling you one btw). Try that with anything you truly believe to be harmful like excessive drinking or smoking. Well the "experts" on google say it's harmful so what now?
The thing they do is they will spin plastics as a climate change and environmental hazard first ("Guys, it's hurting mommy Erf and the polar bears") and the harm it causes to humans, especially in terms of fertility, goes in the background. This is also a common propaganda technique.
PS: Here's the truth about the fat wars and the war on meat and animal products in general: https://x.com/fightwithmemes/status/1868183961714770368/photo/1
And talking about real scams and propaganda, who could forget the infamous food pyramid: https://wearechief.com/blogs/articles/the-corrupt-history-of-the-food-pyramid?srsltid=AfmBOooU7uQu0ukmIp34766wedWc0yXDs-embQCad-IJHpBURthRv_Oy How can you still claim they want to reduce carbs in the diet when they created that unscientific monstrosity and brainwashed people into thinking this is healthy in any way.