Today I learned: Age of Consent = Prepubescent Child. Thanks Reddit!
(media.conspiracies.win)
Politics
Comments (22)
sorted by:
I dont know if Matt Gaetz is a pedophile or not. It's important to note the context of the allegations: Matt Gaetz's friend Joel Greenberg (Jewish) was the connection between Matt and the alleged sex with a minor.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/gaetz-associate-sentenced-11-years-sources-probe-florida/story?id=94225875
Why was this not pursued further? Probably because Greenberg acted as an Epstein-like Mossad operative to honeypot American politicians and once you start getting close to Mossad / sex-trafficking / honeypots the trail abruptly ends.
So, blackmail attempt?
probably
Legal definition of child in most states is a person under the age of majority. That´s under 18.
Definition of pedophile is an adult who has sex or wants to have sex with children.
So now that I have educated you, what´s an adult man who has sex with a 17 year old?
These are allegations that have not led to civil or criminal prosecution hence "I don't know if he is a pedophile" because these allegations have NOT been proven true in a court of law. I'm clearly aware of the definition of pedophilia - are you aware of the difference between allegations and criminal prosecution?
I DO know his (Jewish) accomplice Joel Greenberg DID go to jail for sex trafficking minors so I KNOW Joel Greenberg is a pedophile. It's odd that the US has two (Jewish) individuals (Epstein, Greenberg) running sex-trafficking rings for US politicians - what are the coincidences? So odd.
Now we do know Israeli was caught installing cellphone towers around the white house / DC. (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/12/israel-planted-spying-devices-near-white-house-says-report) so Israel has a history of spying on US politicians. So you have the Israeli government spying on politicians and (Jews) running sex-tracking for US politicians - suddenly a picture of control/entrapment begins to emerge.
Maybe not a pedophile per se but it's definitely ethically questionable
So i’m not the only one that started puberty at 17 and a half!!
Normal male behavior. I'd be wary of influential men who DONT have sex with bio prime nubiles- demonstrates an irrational neuroticism. The bad guys rape 6 year olds.
Normal Male behavior, isn't being a vegan. Also, have you seen his wife?
https://x.com/GingerLGaetz/status/1609612237689294848
The fact that you would even for a second think to connect my life, those facts, and that man means you are stupid and 13.
What facts? The fact that you are vegan? What connections? Which Man?
Fucking Gaetz dumbass and the fact that they say he fucked some 17 year old. Factually normal heterosexual male behavior.
And I am connecting that to you how? So, is it normal or not? Because you seem very offended at those connection that you are making yourself.
Haha fuckin public education, Jesus.
Meanwhile if you dare even mention drawing NSFW of fictional children, perceived or real, there will be a crusade launched on your head.
You simply cannot stop wanting to look at child porn, can you?
That´s literally all you are obsessing about here.
Fucking degenerate.
Dramatically missing the point; You can trip those boundaries on complete mistake and lose everything while the actual pedophiles get away with harems of kids. Unless the elites don't like them like they do with Epstein.
It's like in the Medieval era where you accuse the priests of raping kids you will die of heresy, but the landlord can kidnap and marry your daughter for no reason other than he wants to and has probably done it a bunch of times.
Actually, me makes a point. As the C.I.A doesn't want you to look at images that don't harm people, as they can't run their blackmail racket if no one is being harmed.
So you have no problems with the the AG banging underage hookers?
You have no problem believing reddit, and a deep state operatives? And are calling a trafficked girl as a hooker? Are you controlled opposition? Because if so, you can simply present these theories instead of prompting me to state them through Questions that make you seem, 'of low intelligence'.
No, I don´t. Now what?
Oh, now you address my second statement and explain to me why you are calling a trafficked young person a hooker. Actually that's my third point, my second was on deep state operatives, but, I'll assume good faith on your part, and move past that.