In 2005 Trump said “I have to start by saying that I’m a big fan, a very big fan, of the United Nations and all it stands for.” This statement would appear to stand in contrast to the recent campaign announcements in front of an AIPAC crowd in which Trump spoke more truthfully. “The United Nations is not a friend of democracy. It’s not a friend to freedom. It’s not even a friend to the United States of America, where we all know, it has its home. And it surely isn’t a friend to Israel.”
In 1987 Donald Trump purchased his first casino interests when he acquired 93% of the shares in Resorts International. Resorts International has a sordid history which began in the early 1950’s when it evolved from a CIA and Mossad front company which had been established for the purpose of money laundering the profits from drug trafficking, gambling, and other illegal activities.
The socioeconomic engineering benefits of mass population manipulation through means of drug addiction, gambling, and other vices, far outweigh those provided by money laundering alone. It can be assumed that money laundering acted as a secondary advantage in much the same way that the subjugation of the Chinese population through the spread of opium financially benefited the East India Trading Company centuries before.
On October 30, 1978, The Spotlight newspaper reported that the principle investors of Resorts International were Meyer Lansky, Tibor Rosenbaum, William Mellon Hitchcock, David Rockefeller, and one Baron Edmond de Rothschild.
You can disagree with their interpretation (I and do), but they're still two different things.
Would I like to see "hate speech" eliminated from law, or reduced to an immediate and actionable threat of violence? Yes. Do I think threats should be dealt with by authorities before people take matters into their own hands? Also, yes.
Do I think there is ever a reason for thr government to make determinations regarding facts? No, never, no exceptions, which is why I'm fine with the two being dealt with separately.
Except anti semetic, you will have no freedom for that.
"I will then ban federal money from being used to label domestic speech as mis or dis information."
Notice that the most threatening of the censorship terminology - "hate speech" - was somehow left out of that statement.
Possibly because Jews want "hate speech" laws in place to deal with anyone who mentions Jews in an unflattering manner.
Really strange how jews are the only legally protected race. I dont see any other race with laws designed to specifically protect their feelings.
And why? Because israel is the holy land? How many people in america even still believe in god anymore.
But its funny seeing the guy who was bailed out by the deep state, bitching about the deep state. How the fuck do you lose money on a casino anyway.
I guess when all your doing is spending money on partys and strippers.
https://www.europereloaded.com/rothschild-inc-saved-donald-trump/
He the good guy tho.
Eh, they're fundamentally different.
One is the government being the arbiter of objective facts, and it would be good if they were explicitely blocked from doing them.
Hate speech falls within their discretion because it has to do with whether some speech is threatening to the point of justifying violence.
Jews are pussies so we really don't need to worry about offending them.
No it doesn't.
It is, and will continue to be, whatever they want it to be at a given time.
Just like misinformation and disinformation.
Three ambiguous terms chosen specifically because of how easy it is for government to interpret and reinterpret them however they want.
You can disagree with their interpretation (I and do), but they're still two different things.
Would I like to see "hate speech" eliminated from law, or reduced to an immediate and actionable threat of violence? Yes. Do I think threats should be dealt with by authorities before people take matters into their own hands? Also, yes.
Do I think there is ever a reason for thr government to make determinations regarding facts? No, never, no exceptions, which is why I'm fine with the two being dealt with separately.