The demonization of white women by white men is part of their anti-white plans.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
You:
You must be older than me. Good luck nowadays. Volcel because I can cook and clean for myself. My hands can do everything a woman could ever do for me and they don't complain, wander off with other dudes, or leave with all my stuff. I agree it's not all, but those ones are happily married.
Devout activity in a faith based area can increase your odds of finding a higher quality woman, but you have to put in the work.
Did and have been, found a bunch of hasbins. Mgtow now. Heck, I like the sound of wringing my car engine's neck better than the pleasure of a female in bed.
You're not that devout then, no offense intended.
And yes, even based Christian men get divorce raped, but that's not what I mean by my comment.
Exactly what the social engineers want - more atomization, less families and less children.
Pretty wild how so few people, even on a conspiracy board, don't know about the Kalergi plan, as they keep advocating for ideas, behaviors, policies, and philosophies which help advance the Kalergi plan.
Malthus, Royal Society, Tavistock, Rockefeller, Club of Rome, Kalergi, P. Erlich, Georgia Guidstones, Kissinger report, Global 2000 report, Brzezinski, J. Attali, Gates, Salk, Sanger, Russel - it's definitely not the best kept secret.
I could make excuses all day. Between my raising and dating life I endured, I just don't care about it anymore. I have things I would like to afford to do before I get to old to do them.
Me ... me ... selfish ... selfish ... me ... me ...
To become a father, you have to put your kids first. That means self sacrifice. You are not mature enough to become a father yet.
Can you give an example of what you like to afford to do before you get married and have children? I want to know what you believe to be better than having your own children run up to you and hug you.
His argument is not NAWALT. His argument is that if we put women legally under the control of men, as they were before female suffrage, they wouldn't be in any position to destroy the lives of not just their husbands but also their children.
Just like a child must be stopped from eating nothing but candy and ice cream, a woman must be stopped from being a whore.