Alt righters who think we have too much "libertarianism" truly astonish me. The LP is the party who gets the least amount of votes, in a country where the government taxes half our income and regulates the ability to BRAID HAIR legally.
I would never say we should have no social regulation or moral rules enforced. But a move in the direction of a libertarian decentralized USA would be a huge improvement. We could have far less laws, and still enforce the important ones, like public decency. In fact we could do a better job at that enforcement when law enforcement isn't wasting time on so many other things.
Alternatively, you could be Catholic, like me, and believe in the concepts of subsidiarity, solidarity, and corporatism or distributism. Those would solve what you're talking about, without having to appeal to a Judeo-Masonic ideology.
Look I think you Catholics mean well and are usually close to being saved or can actually be saved already (depending). But Martin Luther figured out the Vatican's game a long time ago. He also called out the Jews. So you can't tell me "Protestants are Jew worshipers". The very first one wrote an entire book refuting them.
u/TurnToGodNow should read this article to see how the heretic Scofeld has essentially turned almost all American Protestants into perfidious Judaizers:
He also called out the Jews. So you can't tell me "Protestants are jew worshipers".
a) Calling out the jews implies Martin Luther protesting. Protestant implies one who follows by consent those who suggest protestantism in the name of Martin Luther....followers aren't protesting anything.
b) A jew exploits gentile ignorance of the aforementioned in a way more devious way...
PROTEST', verb (Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it) - "to affirm with solemnity; to make a solemn declaration of a fact or opinion; as, I protest to you, I have no knowledge of the transaction"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/protest
Hence to protest implies a transaction between a jew selling (suggestion) and gentiles buying (consent).
c) Martin Luther aka MARS (war) LOOTER...spoils for the takin'...handrubbin' intensifies...
Meaning implies your choice to hold onto suggested information, while ignoring that holding onto (truth) is the foundation for "the jews and their lies".
martin luther
Suggested meaning...Martin Luther writing on jews and their lies, while reforming and protesting the status quo by nailing theses onto churches.
Perceivable...a jew suggesting lutheranism; protestantism; reformism etc. in the name of Martin Luther to tempt consenting gentiles to follow jewish suggestions.
Seeking meaning tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction). Nature changes...holding onto the meaning of 1483 Martin Luther in 2024 ignores change. A jew ruthlessly exploits ignorance among gentiles with suggested meaning.
What I write isn't about discrediting what happened 500 years ago, but about those who ignore reality right now, and those who exploit that ignorance with fiction right now.
planted by jews
Plane (inception towards death) generates plants (life)...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore that, which then corrupts growth of seeds.
Hate to break it to you but the Catholics named the Jews first lol.
I literally have a whole 14 part article series showing how the Church Fathers, Doctors, Popes, and Catholic Ecumenical Councils named the Jew (before ol' Marty was even born):
Calling out the Jews is great, but killing Bible believers negates anything else. Even Pagan Rome had disdain for Jews, but that in and of itself isn't enough.
Also your current Popes are openly on board with the NWO beast system. And unlike Protestants, your church teachings bind you to such leaders. We are only bound to the word of God and the Holy Spirit (those who are truly born again).
The Popes of the Middle Ages didn't kill "Bible believers". They ordered executions of popular heretics, who by definition, have a false exegesis of the Bible and thus, lead souls to Hell if they are not silenced. If these people merely believed and preached what the Bible teaches as understood by all Christians in all places in all times, from the beginning of Christianity, then the inquisitions would have found them "not guilty".
And no, your understanding of filial obedience is incorrect. We Catholics are not bound to obey when Popes teach rather obvious errors against the Faith.
You lack understanding of the history of Christianity and lack understanding of ecclesiology and theology. I would advise you to humble yourself. Remember, God gave you 2 eyes, 2 ears, and 1 mouth. Shut your ignorant mouth, and open your 2 eyes and 2 ears to humbly research the history of Christianity, what the early Christians believed and what the Catholic Church actually teaches (since you do not know).
I will put my faith in God and not in man. I will not murder on behalf of a rich warlord claiming to speak for Christ, but will support the true martyrs who followed Jesus Christ.
The true martyrs are those like the ones in the Early Church that were killed by Diocletian and other Pagan Roman Emperors for unflinchingly confessing the Faith. These martyrs are all Catholic. The ones you claim to be "martyrs" are heretics, and likely in Hell. Christ gave us a Church to be run by Peter, not a Bible. Again, you would do well to read and understand what the early Christians believed, and you will see that you are actually the one who believes in a false Gospel.
Using free will of choice to consent to a suggested -ism tempts one to ignore being free (liber), while binding oneself to another.
individual liberty
Within (in) the division (divi) of two (dual)...one cannot be free without being tethered aka bound to another.
common good of society
How could one be free (liber) if one consents to suggested common-ism (communism) and society-ism (socialism), while fighting others within a conflict of reason (good vs bad)?
Lolbertism originates from classical liberalism, which is masonic and revolutionary (read jewish, hence why they are anti hierarchy and authority). Ayn Rand's "do as thou wilt, pursue your desires at any cost" philosophy is exactly what spawned the degenerate clown world we live in today.
Libertarianism in a nutshell: "Getting raped by government is evil but Blackrock raping you is fine because they are a private corporation".
Alt righters who think we have too much "libertarianism" truly astonish me. The LP is the party who gets the least amount of votes, in a country where the government taxes half our income and regulates the ability to BRAID HAIR legally.
I would never say we should have no social regulation or moral rules enforced. But a move in the direction of a libertarian decentralized USA would be a huge improvement. We could have far less laws, and still enforce the important ones, like public decency. In fact we could do a better job at that enforcement when law enforcement isn't wasting time on so many other things.
How could one alternate (alt) when holding onto a side (right)?
Alternatively, you could be Catholic, like me, and believe in the concepts of subsidiarity, solidarity, and corporatism or distributism. Those would solve what you're talking about, without having to appeal to a Judeo-Masonic ideology.
Look I think you Catholics mean well and are usually close to being saved or can actually be saved already (depending). But Martin Luther figured out the Vatican's game a long time ago. He also called out the Jews. So you can't tell me "Protestants are Jew worshipers". The very first one wrote an entire book refuting them.
To be fair, American evangelical protestants suck Israel's cock harder than any other group of goys
^This really cannot be denied.
u/TurnToGodNow should read this article to see how the heretic Scofeld has essentially turned almost all American Protestants into perfidious Judaizers:
https://www.wrmea.org/2015-october/the-scofield-bible-the-book-that-made-zionists-of-americas-evangelical-christians.html
a) Calling out the jews implies Martin Luther protesting. Protestant implies one who follows by consent those who suggest protestantism in the name of Martin Luther....followers aren't protesting anything.
b) A jew exploits gentile ignorance of the aforementioned in a way more devious way...
PROTEST', verb (Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it) - "to affirm with solemnity; to make a solemn declaration of a fact or opinion; as, I protest to you, I have no knowledge of the transaction"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/protest
Hence to protest implies a transaction between a jew selling (suggestion) and gentiles buying (consent).
c) Martin Luther aka MARS (war) LOOTER...spoils for the takin'...handrubbin' intensifies...
what do you mean? martin luther was planted by jews?
Meaning implies your choice to hold onto suggested information, while ignoring that holding onto (truth) is the foundation for "the jews and their lies".
Suggested meaning...Martin Luther writing on jews and their lies, while reforming and protesting the status quo by nailing theses onto churches.
Perceivable...a jew suggesting lutheranism; protestantism; reformism etc. in the name of Martin Luther to tempt consenting gentiles to follow jewish suggestions.
Seeking meaning tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction). Nature changes...holding onto the meaning of 1483 Martin Luther in 2024 ignores change. A jew ruthlessly exploits ignorance among gentiles with suggested meaning.
What I write isn't about discrediting what happened 500 years ago, but about those who ignore reality right now, and those who exploit that ignorance with fiction right now.
Plane (inception towards death) generates plants (life)...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore that, which then corrupts growth of seeds.
Hate to break it to you but the Catholics named the Jews first lol.
I literally have a whole 14 part article series showing how the Church Fathers, Doctors, Popes, and Catholic Ecumenical Councils named the Jew (before ol' Marty was even born):
https://thecatholicstate.com/what-the-catholic-church-teaches-about-the-jews-part-1/
Calling out the Jews is great, but killing Bible believers negates anything else. Even Pagan Rome had disdain for Jews, but that in and of itself isn't enough.
Also your current Popes are openly on board with the NWO beast system. And unlike Protestants, your church teachings bind you to such leaders. We are only bound to the word of God and the Holy Spirit (those who are truly born again).
The Popes of the Middle Ages didn't kill "Bible believers". They ordered executions of popular heretics, who by definition, have a false exegesis of the Bible and thus, lead souls to Hell if they are not silenced. If these people merely believed and preached what the Bible teaches as understood by all Christians in all places in all times, from the beginning of Christianity, then the inquisitions would have found them "not guilty".
And no, your understanding of filial obedience is incorrect. We Catholics are not bound to obey when Popes teach rather obvious errors against the Faith.
You lack understanding of the history of Christianity and lack understanding of ecclesiology and theology. I would advise you to humble yourself. Remember, God gave you 2 eyes, 2 ears, and 1 mouth. Shut your ignorant mouth, and open your 2 eyes and 2 ears to humbly research the history of Christianity, what the early Christians believed and what the Catholic Church actually teaches (since you do not know).
Look at how that turned out...few silencing many by drowning them in noise.
Meanwhile a jew tells how it is...
I will put my faith in God and not in man. I will not murder on behalf of a rich warlord claiming to speak for Christ, but will support the true martyrs who followed Jesus Christ.
The true martyrs are those like the ones in the Early Church that were killed by Diocletian and other Pagan Roman Emperors for unflinchingly confessing the Faith. These martyrs are all Catholic. The ones you claim to be "martyrs" are heretics, and likely in Hell. Christ gave us a Church to be run by Peter, not a Bible. Again, you would do well to read and understand what the early Christians believed, and you will see that you are actually the one who believes in a false Gospel.
https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/churchfathers.html
How could holding onto a concept solve anything? Doesn't solving imply taking apart what one holds together?
Being implies different from one another...likeness implies ones choice to ignore that.
Using free will of choice to consent to a suggested -ism tempts one to ignore being free (liber), while binding oneself to another.
Within (in) the division (divi) of two (dual)...one cannot be free without being tethered aka bound to another.
How could one be free (liber) if one consents to suggested common-ism (communism) and society-ism (socialism), while fighting others within a conflict of reason (good vs bad)?
Lolbertism originates from classical liberalism, which is masonic and revolutionary (read jewish, hence why they are anti hierarchy and authority). Ayn Rand's "do as thou wilt, pursue your desires at any cost" philosophy is exactly what spawned the degenerate clown world we live in today.
Libertarianism in a nutshell: "Getting raped by government is evil but Blackrock raping you is fine because they are a private corporation".