Using free will of choice to consent to a suggested -ism tempts one to ignore being free (liber), while binding oneself to another.
individual liberty
Within (in) the division (divi) of two (dual)...one cannot be free without being tethered aka bound to another.
common good of society
How could one be free (liber) if one consents to suggested common-ism (communism) and society-ism (socialism), while fighting others within a conflict of reason (good vs bad)?
Using free will of choice to consent to a suggested -ism tempts one to ignore being free (liber), while binding oneself to another.
Within (in) the division (divi) of two (dual)...one cannot be free without being tethered aka bound to another.
How could one be free (liber) if one consents to suggested common-ism (communism) and society-ism (socialism), while fighting others within a conflict of reason (good vs bad)?