Where’s the con supposed to be. The papacy is a corrupt institution of men, yes. Your point? Protestantism is a bunch of jew worshippers masquerading as Christians. Your point? Orthodoxy has lost literally all of its fire and refuses to oppose jews in any way. Your point?
Doctrine/docere/dek - "to take; accept" which implies taking into possession by holding onto.
Christian/christen - "to anoint" implies setting apart aka letting go of an off-spring.
Christian implies apart; doctrine implies together aka CON, verb - "together; with". That's the big swindle aka nature setting apart, while few within are tempting many together.
Hmm... where oh where is there snake oil like con in the dogma?
Christianity's timeline coincides with Jews moving power and money which allowed them to create the doctrines over the next few hundred years (which are all just retelling of fables from timelines before then) and that celebrate Judaism.
Christianity is a weapon of Jewish elites. You can't prove me wrong bcz LOOK AROUND YOU!!!
Christianity's timeline coincides with Jews moving power and money which allowed them to create the doctrines over the next few hundred years
You mean the Talmud? Because the Gospels were codified extremely quickly and remained the same ever since.
(which are all just retelling of fables from timelines before then)
Already disproven centuries ago.
and that celebrate Judaism.
Explicitly call for its global destruction.
Christianity is a weapon of Jewish elites.
Nah, the religion that says to destroy the works of the jews is not a weapon of the jews.
You can't prove me wrong bcz
Thanks for admitting you’re wrong.
LOOK AROUND YOU!!!
I see jews having conquered the world because Christians gave up reading the Bible. Go the fuck away, yid. Same paid jewish spam every single fucking day.
How could anything within a moving system remain the same? What if many are tricked to hold onto suggestions by few, while believing that holding onto mental or physical possessions makes them remain the same?
The religion that says to destroy the works of the jews is not a weapon of the jews
What about "antisemitism" ?
I see jews having conquered the world because Christians gave up
What if only God gives? What if ignoring that which is given by consenting to what others are offering permits few to conquer many?
What if conquer aka con (together; with) quaerere (to seek; gain) implies many together seeking to gain from few apart?
I see...the world
Impossible from within, right? Made possible by consenting to what others are showing about outside, right?
Elite - "selection; choice" implies by ones weapon of choice, which each anointed (christian) wields within perceivable, yet ignores when consenting to suggested.
This consent of an elect (ones choice) towards the suggestion of selected elite (chosen one) establishes one under another; many under few; buyers under sellers; slaves under masters; followers under leaders; gentiles under a jew...
"The weapons (choice) of our warfare (reason) are not carnal" ~2 Corinthians 10:4.
More spoiler alert --> Jews created Christianity to weaponize peasants against controlling cultures like Romans. Just like they did in Babylon and a few more times since.
Both judaism and creationism imply suggested religions...if consented to.
against
a) Implies reasoning against another about a religion one consented to.
b) Instead of "for vs against"; try forwarding (inception towards death) a gain (life)...
like they did in babylon
a) Babylon aka BA'BEL, noun (Heb) - "confusion; disorder"
b) Same (inception towards death) generating differences (life) implies natural order...differences choosing to behave alike implies disorder.
c) Consenting to suggested pluralism (they) tempts one to ignore differences among one another for likeness with one another.
d) Your consent to "they" establishes confusion (babel) and suggesting "they" to others implies artificial uttering (babble), which makes one a Babylonian aka confused one aka babbling one.
Where’s the con supposed to be. The papacy is a corrupt institution of men, yes. Your point? Protestantism is a bunch of jew worshippers masquerading as Christians. Your point? Orthodoxy has lost literally all of its fire and refuses to oppose jews in any way. Your point?
Where’s the “con” in Christian doctrine, then?
Christian implies apart; doctrine implies together aka CON, verb - "together; with". That's the big swindle aka nature setting apart, while few within are tempting many together.
Hmm... where oh where is there snake oil like con in the dogma?
Christianity's timeline coincides with Jews moving power and money which allowed them to create the doctrines over the next few hundred years (which are all just retelling of fables from timelines before then) and that celebrate Judaism.
Christianity is a weapon of Jewish elites. You can't prove me wrong bcz LOOK AROUND YOU!!!
Wew, lad.
You mean the Talmud? Because the Gospels were codified extremely quickly and remained the same ever since.
Already disproven centuries ago.
Explicitly call for its global destruction.
Nah, the religion that says to destroy the works of the jews is not a weapon of the jews.
Thanks for admitting you’re wrong.
I see jews having conquered the world because Christians gave up reading the Bible. Go the fuck away, yid. Same paid jewish spam every single fucking day.
How could anything within a moving system remain the same? What if many are tricked to hold onto suggestions by few, while believing that holding onto mental or physical possessions makes them remain the same?
What about "antisemitism" ?
What if only God gives? What if ignoring that which is given by consenting to what others are offering permits few to conquer many?
What if conquer aka con (together; with) quaerere (to seek; gain) implies many together seeking to gain from few apart?
Impossible from within, right? Made possible by consenting to what others are showing about outside, right?
Elite - "selection; choice" implies by ones weapon of choice, which each anointed (christian) wields within perceivable, yet ignores when consenting to suggested.
This consent of an elect (ones choice) towards the suggestion of selected elite (chosen one) establishes one under another; many under few; buyers under sellers; slaves under masters; followers under leaders; gentiles under a jew...
"The weapons (choice) of our warfare (reason) are not carnal" ~2 Corinthians 10:4.
I'll just leave this here...
it's a loser religion it is targeted at them and mobilizes them
More spoiler alert --> Jews created Christianity to weaponize peasants against controlling cultures like Romans. Just like they did in Babylon and a few more times since.
Thanks for admitting that Christianity is the antithesis of judaism and that jews hate it more than anything else on Earth.
Both judaism and creationism imply suggested religions...if consented to.
a) Implies reasoning against another about a religion one consented to.
b) Instead of "for vs against"; try forwarding (inception towards death) a gain (life)...
a) Babylon aka BA'BEL, noun (Heb) - "confusion; disorder"
b) Same (inception towards death) generating differences (life) implies natural order...differences choosing to behave alike implies disorder.
c) Consenting to suggested pluralism (they) tempts one to ignore differences among one another for likeness with one another.
d) Your consent to "they" establishes confusion (babel) and suggesting "they" to others implies artificial uttering (babble), which makes one a Babylonian aka confused one aka babbling one.