You are saying that a large number of electronic devices can be made to explode in this manner without preparing them with explosives first. Experts have already examined unexploded devices and found explosive charges in them.
To be more accurate, devices with Lithium batteries. And I am not saying anything. I am just sharing the fact that many other devices exploded the next day which you should have seen in my previous links.
The pagers attack could be one thing, but the second day attack which included not only radio comm but also random electrical devices with lithium batteries. Also public statements are one thing and the complete truth is another.
If you also watched the video I linked about Oron you would know that a lot can be done with the electromagnetic spectrum.
...but also random electrical devices with lithium batteries...a lot can be done with the electromagnetic spectrum.
So you believe that they have figured out how to make a battery have a similar explosive force to a bomb using directed energy. What is plausible to me is that they would use that as a cover story to conceal the actual truth, which is that terrorist organizations could copycat this atrocity.
I believe that the devices were manufactured with booby traps and were remotely activated using network connectivity. I also believe that they were made as part of a planned attack years before October 7, 2023.
I agree with you on the Pagers attack. My final conclusion is they used explosives inside the pagers. Because also like what TurnToGodNow said, all the pager explosions were simultaneous.
BUT I think the explosions the second day happened by heating up the batteries. Casualties the next day were few in comparison and from a video I saw the explosions did not happen simultaneously the next day and seemed to happen from one area to the next as if beam forming can only target one location. Also many Lebanese could hear a large airplane while it happened.
I believe it is network connectivity, and even an aircraft could have facilitated it.
The pagers were detonated by a sequence of button presses, ensuring that the victims where in range.
Anyway, what you're doing is trying to make it seem like some science fiction technology was used here when in reality terrorist organizations can simply copy from what happened to make it happen anywhere.
I understand how a pager could receive a coordinated signal to trigger its explosion, because it's on a cellular network. I don't understand how a 2-way radio (walkie-talkie) could receive such a signal because they aren't uniquely identified devices on a network.
It is now not too far-fetched to openly presume they did have something to do with the towers' collapse.
It's not just walkie talkies. it's EVERYTHING electrical!! Electric cars, solar panel batteries, mobile phones, everything!
https://conspiracies.win/p/19952xBJ0D/understanding-what-happened-in-l/c/
https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/19952xBJ0D/understanding-what-happened-in-l/c
Thx.
You appear to be trying to muddy the waters.
Perhaps you are the one whose trying to? I've got my info from the links I provided anyone can check for himself.
You are saying that a large number of electronic devices can be made to explode in this manner without preparing them with explosives first. Experts have already examined unexploded devices and found explosive charges in them.
To be more accurate, devices with Lithium batteries. And I am not saying anything. I am just sharing the fact that many other devices exploded the next day which you should have seen in my previous links.
The pagers attack could be one thing, but the second day attack which included not only radio comm but also random electrical devices with lithium batteries. Also public statements are one thing and the complete truth is another.
If you also watched the video I linked about Oron you would know that a lot can be done with the electromagnetic spectrum.
So you believe that they have figured out how to make a battery have a similar explosive force to a bomb using directed energy. What is plausible to me is that they would use that as a cover story to conceal the actual truth, which is that terrorist organizations could copycat this atrocity.
I believe that the devices were manufactured with booby traps and were remotely activated using network connectivity. I also believe that they were made as part of a planned attack years before October 7, 2023.
I agree with you on the Pagers attack. My final conclusion is they used explosives inside the pagers. Because also like what TurnToGodNow said, all the pager explosions were simultaneous.
BUT I think the explosions the second day happened by heating up the batteries. Casualties the next day were few in comparison and from a video I saw the explosions did not happen simultaneously the next day and seemed to happen from one area to the next as if beam forming can only target one location. Also many Lebanese could hear a large airplane while it happened.
I believe it is network connectivity, and even an aircraft could have facilitated it.
The pagers were detonated by a sequence of button presses, ensuring that the victims where in range.
Anyway, what you're doing is trying to make it seem like some science fiction technology was used here when in reality terrorist organizations can simply copy from what happened to make it happen anywhere.
Perhaps Hezbollah would be better off selling those devices on eBay in the United States, maybe that would wake up some people
I understand how a pager could receive a coordinated signal to trigger its explosion, because it's on a cellular network. I don't understand how a 2-way radio (walkie-talkie) could receive such a signal because they aren't uniquely identified devices on a network.
THIS is why we can't have an Internet of Things!