Let me ask you, whats the highest math youve completed?

I can say from personal experience, many of my classmates who were in calculus, were not very religious people.

In fact its kinda strange, it seems some of the more famous mathematicians will become religious after looking at the math.

https://scienceandnonduality.com/article/god-is-a-mathematician/

The structures of the universe, from the tiniest (subatomic) to the largest (cosmic), can be visualized as networks or webs of connections. And, these networks are interlocking, pulsating particles, exchanging, sharing and transforming energy from one form to another. Physics today is understood through mathematics. Scientists have long used mathematics to describe the physical properties of the universe, but physicist Max Tegmarkiv goes even further and believes that the universe itself is math. In Tegmark’s view, everything in the universe — humans included — is part of a mathematical structure. All matter is made up of particles, which have properties such as charge and spin, but these properties are purely mathematical, he says. And space itself has properties such as dimensions, but is still ultimately a mathematical structure.

Mathematics, numbers, symbols, information and energy are different ways by which physicists have attempted to describe the universe. Modern theories in physics are abstract and mystifying to most. For many, faith in the divine origin of the universe provides more certitude than modern physics does. Faith gives one certainty which physics is unable to do, this is the appeal of faith for many. Certainty in an uncertain world is comforting.

Just quoting a paragraph from one of einsteins papers, and one with alot of fancy technical terms in it to boot. Isnt proof of much. Show me a equation that he got wrong and I might be more inclined to listen.

I dont think those words mean what you think they do, they all prolly have some stupid technical definition, You see stuff like that in specialized fields all the time. Seems intentional to me, but who knows why egg heads do what they do sometimes. And when I say intentional, I mean they want to confuse the average person so they cant make heads or tails of these kinda reports.

This quora quote seems to prove that he didnt think he was 100% right about everything either.

Einstein famously didn’t like aspects of quantum mechanics, even though he is partially responsible for it thanks to his paper on the photoelectric effect. The problem was the inherent randomness of complementarity and the uncertainty principle of it – Einstein was a classicist, and preferred a deterministic universe. He expressed his point of view in a letter to Max Born in 1926:

“Die Quantenmechanik ist sehr achtung-gebietend. Aber eine innere Stimme sagt mir, daß das doch nicht der wahre Jakob ist. Die Theorie liefert viel, aber dem Geheimnis des Alten bringt sie uns kaum näher. Jedenfalls bin ich überzeugt, daß der nicht würfelt.”

Which means,

“Quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The theory says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the "old one." I, at any rate, am convinced that He does not throw dice.”

He was so pleased with this line that he quoted himself several times. Allegedly, Niels Bohr got tired of it and eventually retorted “Don’t tell God what to do with his dice!”

And by the way I look at things like those bubble chamber pictures.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/bubble-chamber

And it becomes quite, quite hard to say that this universe isnt built on patterns and rules. It may very well be that god created "everything", but how does proof of the construct invalidate his existence, I dont get it.

I believe in something, an all pervasive force that we and everything in this universe is created from, but it aint no modern god sitting in the clouds judging you for every mistake you have made in your life lmao.

And I certainly dont believe paying the church tons of money will absolve you of your sins either.

a mind capable of reason

What if reason (versus) makes ones mind incapable of implication (if/then)?

logical necessity

One needs to breathe...where is the need for logic in that? What is a gasping infant reasoning about?

the difference between the impossible and the possible

a) IM implies IN, hence within possible... https://www.etymonline.com/word/im-#etymonline_v_1519

Only within actual (inception towards death) can a potential (life) respond outwards.

b) THE difference; THE impossible; THE possible implies suggested the-ism tempting each different one to consent alike.

Few suggest the-ism to equalize differences among many...

C isn't what's being doubted here, special relativity theory is.

Show me one experiment that falsifies the speed of light.

a) Any suggested experiment tempts one to ignore being within the perceivable spectrum of light.

b) Light (motion) generates a spectrum (momentum) for particle rays (matter) within... all measurements ignore this internal separation of energy.

Few suggest "differential calculus" to tempt many to ignore that all is one in energy.