It really exposed a lot of people as just red colored NPCs.
Essentially they are upset because they did something good and were not rewarded for it.
Which is incredibly fucked on multiple levels.
They supported the god given inalienable right to defend oneself with armed force, which is the good and moral thing to do. The end. Or it should be but these faggots got all but hurt because Kyle didn’t support their ideas.
If you only do something good because there is a reward you are not good.
When will people learn that c/TheZognald is a shabbos goy jew kike loving fraud boomer who appoints jews and absolute fucking morons like scaramucci and Omarosa and Jeff sessions the most retarded attorney general who stood down and let jew frauds fill the void and start Russia Russia nonsense.
Trump also let Jews and Fraudci dictate martial law to us over a fake academic with a 99.9% survival rate for anyone who wasn't a fat lazy fuck or jabbed 100x with jew poisons to the point their immune systems were hijacked and useless.
Trump has never even hinted at ending the fed or banning gay marriage or declaring war in Israel so we can begin rounding up the kikes for impalement.
If that was true, there wouldn't have been a flurry of court cases, by Trump supporters, undoing the Trump bump stock ban, one of which went all the way to SCOTUS
Everyone on the Donald is upset because Kyle doesn’t support their views.
They are upset because they did something good and were not rewarded.
If you do good expecting to be rewarded you aren’t good.
You are defending shitty people.
Explain how they are not being a bunch of worthless faggots. Or just admit you were wrong.
You are wrong about everything until you learn something new. It’s just the way reality works.
There was, and is, a lot of right wing criticism over Trump's pro-gun control stance. His "take the guns first and ask questions later" attitude. His speaking at the NRA is, well, not because he has heartfelt convictions as a 2A supporter. (He has few heartfelt convictions on anything really).
So basically, they ignore him on this issue (like others) and appreciate the pro-2A judges, without which, there would be way more gun control than there is now.
Thanks for admitting you cannot defend avowed zionist neoconservative civic nationalists within the framework of your own claimed ideology.
on good behavior
Violating the Constitution ≠ “good behavior”
what would you do about them
Arrest them, disbar them, imprison them. Execution as necessary if they’re found to have committed sedition/treason. It’s not like it’s a difficult concept to understand.
Yes, let's ignore your advocating for lawbreaking glowie.
sigh
As for your other take, it's just more ignorance.
You have to impeach federal judges to remove them from office before you arrest them for a crime (of what, making decisions you disagree with, lol) and THEN try them and then execute them. Assuming they were convicted. But, of course, they would be tried in courtrooms with lawyers defending them. I'm sure their fellow judges would be completely impartial.
That is, if you want to follow the constitution that's how you'd do it. But if you don't, why that would be treason, now wouldn't it?
Trapped in your own silly logic loop. We must commit treason to stop the treason.
Let’s take apples and stew them like cranberries. They’ll taste more like prunes than rhubarb does. You have conceded the point and admitted you are incorrect.
glowie.
Congrats on knowing fucking nothing about the words you’re using.
sigh
Back to Reddit, woman.
As for your other take, it's just more ignorance.
Thanks for admitting my statement is correct.
You have to impeach federal judges to remove them from office
Nah. I don’t give a shit about your fake rules made up to protect a nepotistic establishment.
before you arrest them for a crime (of what, making decisions you disagree with, lol)
Thanks for proving you’re a sophist. Back to Reddit, illiterate.
they would be tried in courtrooms with lawyers defending them
Who says.
I'm sure their fellow judges would be completely impartial.
Bold of you to assume any current lawyers would be allowed to stand.
That is, if you want to follow the constitution that's how you'd do it.
K, enjoy what’s coming for you.
But if you don't, why that would be treason, now wouldn't it?
Nope, since I’m not working with foreigners. You need to learn what words mean before you use them, dipshit.
Trapped in your own silly logic loop.
Nope, you’re just too fucking retarded to understand what you’re being told.
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/17txRC9yGA/exposed-kyle-rittenhouse-has-bee/c
Here's another thread
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/17txRC9h95/kyle-this-morning-after-seeing-t/c
All because Kyle Rittenhouse partnered with a gun rights lobby that knows Trump is anti-2A.
It really exposed a lot of people as just red colored NPCs.
Essentially they are upset because they did something good and were not rewarded for it.
Which is incredibly fucked on multiple levels.
They supported the god given inalienable right to defend oneself with armed force, which is the good and moral thing to do. The end. Or it should be but these faggots got all but hurt because Kyle didn’t support their ideas.
If you only do something good because there is a reward you are not good.
When will people learn that c/TheZognald is a shabbos goy jew kike loving fraud boomer who appoints jews and absolute fucking morons like scaramucci and Omarosa and Jeff sessions the most retarded attorney general who stood down and let jew frauds fill the void and start Russia Russia nonsense.
Trump also let Jews and Fraudci dictate martial law to us over a fake academic with a 99.9% survival rate for anyone who wasn't a fat lazy fuck or jabbed 100x with jew poisons to the point their immune systems were hijacked and useless.
Trump has never even hinted at ending the fed or banning gay marriage or declaring war in Israel so we can begin rounding up the kikes for impalement.
If that was true, there wouldn't have been a flurry of court cases, by Trump supporters, undoing the Trump bump stock ban, one of which went all the way to SCOTUS
It's literally right in front of your goddamn retarded face.
snort
The surest people usually have the least idea what the fuck they are talking about?
You're too stupid to be having a conversation with.
I sure hope they're paying you well.
double snort
Yes. Me bash rocks, you big smart. lol
I wish I was getting paid, I do waste too much time with yucks like you I suppose.
Everyone on the Donald is upset because Kyle doesn’t support their views.
They are upset because they did something good and were not rewarded.
If you do good expecting to be rewarded you aren’t good.
You are defending shitty people.
Explain how they are not being a bunch of worthless faggots. Or just admit you were wrong.
You are wrong about everything until you learn something new. It’s just the way reality works.
False choice.
Everyone is a shitty faggot.
But it is true. They refuse to disobey any fake laws on any topic because their ZOG emperor says not to.
There was, and is, a lot of right wing criticism over Trump's pro-gun control stance. His "take the guns first and ask questions later" attitude. His speaking at the NRA is, well, not because he has heartfelt convictions as a 2A supporter. (He has few heartfelt convictions on anything really).
So basically, they ignore him on this issue (like others) and appreciate the pro-2A judges, without which, there would be way more gun control than there is now.
But they obey all the gun control, as well as the anti-2A judges, and do nothing about this. So…
Please, tell us online here which gun control laws you regularly break?
Federal judges serve "on good behavior" which basically means for life. What would you do about them, other than change them out as they retire?
Thanks for admitting you cannot defend avowed zionist neoconservative civic nationalists within the framework of your own claimed ideology.
Violating the Constitution ≠ “good behavior”
Arrest them, disbar them, imprison them. Execution as necessary if they’re found to have committed sedition/treason. It’s not like it’s a difficult concept to understand.
Yes, let's ignore your advocating for lawbreaking glowie.
sigh
As for your other take, it's just more ignorance.
You have to impeach federal judges to remove them from office before you arrest them for a crime (of what, making decisions you disagree with, lol) and THEN try them and then execute them. Assuming they were convicted. But, of course, they would be tried in courtrooms with lawyers defending them. I'm sure their fellow judges would be completely impartial.
That is, if you want to follow the constitution that's how you'd do it. But if you don't, why that would be treason, now wouldn't it?
Trapped in your own silly logic loop. We must commit treason to stop the treason.
Let’s take apples and stew them like cranberries. They’ll taste more like prunes than rhubarb does. You have conceded the point and admitted you are incorrect.
Congrats on knowing fucking nothing about the words you’re using.
Back to Reddit, woman.
Thanks for admitting my statement is correct.
Nah. I don’t give a shit about your fake rules made up to protect a nepotistic establishment.
Thanks for proving you’re a sophist. Back to Reddit, illiterate.
Who says.
Bold of you to assume any current lawyers would be allowed to stand.
K, enjoy what’s coming for you.
Nope, since I’m not working with foreigners. You need to learn what words mean before you use them, dipshit.
Nope, you’re just too fucking retarded to understand what you’re being told.
You aren’t one of us.
Executing traitors ≠ treason.
I was able to trash Muslims there. No consequences.
The minute I began naming the jew, suddenly "no racism" allowed. Fucking frauds. Fuck those moderators.
I tried https://unscored.arete.network/c/Funny/p/17txR8jgEr/ but couldn't pull up the bart simpson meme. What did it say?