Thanks for admitting you cannot defend avowed zionist neoconservative civic nationalists within the framework of your own claimed ideology.
on good behavior
Violating the Constitution ≠ “good behavior”
what would you do about them
Arrest them, disbar them, imprison them. Execution as necessary if they’re found to have committed sedition/treason. It’s not like it’s a difficult concept to understand.
Yes, let's ignore your advocating for lawbreaking glowie.
sigh
As for your other take, it's just more ignorance.
You have to impeach federal judges to remove them from office before you arrest them for a crime (of what, making decisions you disagree with, lol) and THEN try them and then execute them. Assuming they were convicted. But, of course, they would be tried in courtrooms with lawyers defending them. I'm sure their fellow judges would be completely impartial.
That is, if you want to follow the constitution that's how you'd do it. But if you don't, why that would be treason, now wouldn't it?
Trapped in your own silly logic loop. We must commit treason to stop the treason.
Let’s take apples and stew them like cranberries. They’ll taste more like prunes than rhubarb does. You have conceded the point and admitted you are incorrect.
glowie.
Congrats on knowing fucking nothing about the words you’re using.
sigh
Back to Reddit, woman.
As for your other take, it's just more ignorance.
Thanks for admitting my statement is correct.
You have to impeach federal judges to remove them from office
Nah. I don’t give a shit about your fake rules made up to protect a nepotistic establishment.
before you arrest them for a crime (of what, making decisions you disagree with, lol)
Thanks for proving you’re a sophist. Back to Reddit, illiterate.
they would be tried in courtrooms with lawyers defending them
Who says.
I'm sure their fellow judges would be completely impartial.
Bold of you to assume any current lawyers would be allowed to stand.
That is, if you want to follow the constitution that's how you'd do it.
K, enjoy what’s coming for you.
But if you don't, why that would be treason, now wouldn't it?
Nope, since I’m not working with foreigners. You need to learn what words mean before you use them, dipshit.
Trapped in your own silly logic loop.
Nope, you’re just too fucking retarded to understand what you’re being told.
Cool, discussion’s over. You’ve conceded the point. You refuse to read what’s actually written? You get no courtesy and no real replies. Enjoy what’s coming for you, yid. Thank you for admitting that the ZOG bots on TheDonald do exactly what I said and not what you said.
Thanks for admitting you cannot defend avowed zionist neoconservative civic nationalists within the framework of your own claimed ideology.
Violating the Constitution ≠ “good behavior”
Arrest them, disbar them, imprison them. Execution as necessary if they’re found to have committed sedition/treason. It’s not like it’s a difficult concept to understand.
Yes, let's ignore your advocating for lawbreaking glowie.
sigh
As for your other take, it's just more ignorance.
You have to impeach federal judges to remove them from office before you arrest them for a crime (of what, making decisions you disagree with, lol) and THEN try them and then execute them. Assuming they were convicted. But, of course, they would be tried in courtrooms with lawyers defending them. I'm sure their fellow judges would be completely impartial.
That is, if you want to follow the constitution that's how you'd do it. But if you don't, why that would be treason, now wouldn't it?
Trapped in your own silly logic loop. We must commit treason to stop the treason.
Let’s take apples and stew them like cranberries. They’ll taste more like prunes than rhubarb does. You have conceded the point and admitted you are incorrect.
Congrats on knowing fucking nothing about the words you’re using.
Back to Reddit, woman.
Thanks for admitting my statement is correct.
Nah. I don’t give a shit about your fake rules made up to protect a nepotistic establishment.
Thanks for proving you’re a sophist. Back to Reddit, illiterate.
Who says.
Bold of you to assume any current lawyers would be allowed to stand.
K, enjoy what’s coming for you.
Nope, since I’m not working with foreigners. You need to learn what words mean before you use them, dipshit.
Nope, you’re just too fucking retarded to understand what you’re being told.
You aren’t one of us.
Executing traitors ≠ treason.
lol
Okay glowie. We must ignore the constitution and break the law and execute people with show trials to save the constitution and the rule of law.
That's short bus level thinking, or just autistic.
I'm gladly not "one of us" whatever that group is that condescends to admit you into it's membership.
Cool, discussion’s over. You’ve conceded the point. You refuse to read what’s actually written? You get no courtesy and no real replies. Enjoy what’s coming for you, yid. Thank you for admitting that the ZOG bots on TheDonald do exactly what I said and not what you said.