Oh, I think both were entirely CGI, done from scratch by separate people sharing only certain resources.
First, they're synced very, very closely but not perfectly. Why even attempt to replicate a live performance so closely just to get an additional angle?
The easiest anomaly to overlook is the difference in color tone between the two versions. Two cameras might differ in color-balance with a very lame cameraman, but not two copies of the footage. Also note you can see they're identical in the two angles of the newer version.
So as I would argue, two different groups at two different times used CGI to produce the clips. They appear to have used two different CGI software packages, though. In one, the software and settings yielded Biden's suit as dark blue while in the other, almost gray.
Even in a big feature film with hours of CGI, I'm sure they have to be careful but such problems would rarely occur because one team would be using one package for, say, all the spaceship exteriors and laser blasts. It would always match itself perfectly and automatically.
I'm sure the 2nd team was so proud when they finished their work they never compared it to the earlier stream for continuity and quality. Too busy smirking with duper's delight.
I am going to be the asshole here and say that it's just two different perspectives of the same speech and background. The instagram video (on the right) is shot from a different (slightly higher) angle from a greater distance with a different more zoomed-in focal length. For that reason the background is also more zoomed in and more cropped So much so that the top part of the window behind him isn't visible in the shot and some of the background items are cut out from the shot. The trees are look a little different too because of the zoom. But it's all the same stuff in the background.
The one where the angle changes is posted on whitehouse.gov and here on Instagram.
I don't think it's a different location, but rather that both were completely generated using CGI. Reality, such as a live shot with two cameras, maintains it's own absolute coherence unfailingly. With CGI, you have to make sure everything, every single detail, is just as you need it to be or there will be "continuity errors".
Others have zoomed in on his watch, and noticed that it's at the wrong time from the "live" address. It was pre-recorded.
Oh, I think both were entirely CGI, done from scratch by separate people sharing only certain resources.
First, they're synced very, very closely but not perfectly. Why even attempt to replicate a live performance so closely just to get an additional angle?
The easiest anomaly to overlook is the difference in color tone between the two versions. Two cameras might differ in color-balance with a very lame cameraman, but not two copies of the footage. Also note you can see they're identical in the two angles of the newer version.
So as I would argue, two different groups at two different times used CGI to produce the clips. They appear to have used two different CGI software packages, though. In one, the software and settings yielded Biden's suit as dark blue while in the other, almost gray.
Even in a big feature film with hours of CGI, I'm sure they have to be careful but such problems would rarely occur because one team would be using one package for, say, all the spaceship exteriors and laser blasts. It would always match itself perfectly and automatically.
I'm sure the 2nd team was so proud when they finished their work they never compared it to the earlier stream for continuity and quality. Too busy smirking with duper's delight.
He sounds drugged up on some kind of LALA land drug.
wheel chair this guy around a pond and let him feed the ducks.
He does look like the robot Animatronic presidents that they have at disney world. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OE4ueXof2fs
Completely normal. Brandon's aura is so light-positive that it warps space and time itself.
We haven't seen Joe for some time now. For the President of the United States to just vanish off the charts is not just strange.
I am going to be the asshole here and say that it's just two different perspectives of the same speech and background. The instagram video (on the right) is shot from a different (slightly higher) angle from a greater distance with a different more zoomed-in focal length. For that reason the background is also more zoomed in and more cropped So much so that the top part of the window behind him isn't visible in the shot and some of the background items are cut out from the shot. The trees are look a little different too because of the zoom. But it's all the same stuff in the background.
This video on focal length sort of gives you an idea of what I'm trying to say. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYaddCXcKvQ
TLDR, not CGI but probably pre-recorded
So what’s the second video? It’s clearly a different take at a different location. The flags and window frame are blatantly changed.
The one where the angle changes is posted on whitehouse.gov and here on Instagram.
I don't think it's a different location, but rather that both were completely generated using CGI. Reality, such as a live shot with two cameras, maintains it's own absolute coherence unfailingly. With CGI, you have to make sure everything, every single detail, is just as you need it to be or there will be "continuity errors".
Download while it's hot!