Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

32
()
posted 1 year ago by DrLeaks2 1 year ago by DrLeaks2 +32 / -0
10 comments share
10 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (10)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Neo1 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
  • They did let the failed attemp on purpose.

  • They did cause the bleeding ear, and the epic picture with the US flag to take media attention by storm.

  • They did nothing to prevent Trump's increasing political influence because of that event.

Best line I've heard about it - "This looks so fkin Hollywood".

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SuicideTruthbomber 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

More misdirection. What you should notice is how this window has direct line of fire to the podium!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

There were, most likely, 3 shooters, and Crooks was the patsy.

https://rumble.com/v57vvyy-how-many-shooters-john-cullen-on-the-trump-assassination-attempt.html

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Janschology 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

How come you guys don't recognise when you're being given a conspiratorial sandbox to play in?

Read Cass Sunsteins Conspiracy Theories: Their Cause and Cure and put your eyes in and get a clue!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

secret....proves

How does one prove a secret without disproving it?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

a) Trust implies what one chooses to hold onto...labeling others as real or false establishes a trust/bond/contract/connection/creed/faith/belief etc.

b) Suggested without tempts one to ignore being perception "within" perceivable.

c) People (plural) implies ones (singular) trust in suggested pluralism.

In reality...each one implies person/per sonos - "by sound" aka SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; whole". Only within whole can one be a partial aka only within sound can one hear.

mostly_bots

What if "most" bots are utilized by few to feed information to many? How is what few suggest of a greater number than many consenting to it?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SuicideTruthbomber 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Did you see that disgraceful House hearing with Secret Service Director Cheatle. The Democrats doth protest too much, methinks. They were selling the incompetence angle too hard.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy