Some kids were watching it while i was installing kitchen cabinets a few weeks ago.
I thought the movie shows schizofrenia or how emotions/feelings and perception effect a person's outlook and behavior. I didn't think the movie was too bad. The kids learn about anger, joy, sadness, goofiness, etc and maybe learn not to be a slave to their feelings.
I dont trust disney or hollywood so i'm sure there's some satanic subliminal messaging that i didn't notice because i was a bit preoccupied.
Really it is not that hard to use even worst Holliwood production to educate kids about narratives, malicious intents of movies creators and all that crap. :) Kids imagination is powerful enough to imagine that Hollywood hero could be really anti-hero and they really like that approach and questioning protagonist actions. You could easily show them how Hollywood protagonists betray their own, don't care about regular people, how egoistic they are, how arrogant and ignorant, how they do shit left and right and there are tons of such examples in modern Hollywood movies.
Just don't leave kids alone with Hollywood. :) And it is really fun for youself to watch child movies from that angle together with kids.
a) Observe/observo - "to keep; hold". Perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto...it's suggested (information) which tempts ones consent to keep holding onto it, while "serving" others.
b) Watch/wake (to arise) + weg (being lively) implies inception of ones life.
Furthermore...Weg (German way) implies being lively (life) within process of dying (inception towards death) aka ones way of life.
c) TO implies towards aka "inception towards death"; into which ones life comes to be.
To/towards implies WAS (perceivable)...not IS (suggested).
Few trick many to suggest to each other what IS, while ignoring what WAS perceivable before ones perception can discern being within.
To observe is not consent nor acceptance nor approval of what is being observed.
a) Notice that you choose to keep holding onto (ob-servo)...NOT + NOR (nothing or), which is based on ones consent to suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing).
Where else could one get "nothing" from; than from the suggestion of another?
b) Holding onto (observe) implies ones choice of want (holding onto) over need (letting go). Since one cannot hold onto perceivable; holding onto suggested implies ones consent to conflicts of reason (acceptance vs denial + approval vs disapproval).
I can listen to what satan suggests but reject it, disagree with it, condemn it, and disapprove of it.
a) Nature doesn't brand anything...hence "satan" implying ones consent to suggested satanism.
b) Satan/s-t-n/adversary - "to turn" implies turning (suggested) from being (perception) directed (perceivable) aka ones choice to ignore origin (god) for turning towards outcome (satan).
To not subject oneself to the will of God
a) Will implies want (temptation), hence subjected to need (resistance).
b) Origin (god) doesn't require a free will of choice...each one within does, as to be able to respond to origin (need) or ignore it for outcome (want).
c) Being implies choice (matter) within balance (momentum) of god (motion).
the temptations of satan is to hide
a) Falling for temptation implies ignoring to resist.
b) Being implies rising (life) while falling (inception towards death).
c) Origin (all perceivable) reveals (ones perception)...outcome (suggested) hides origin from ones sight underneath ones "willing" ignorance.
d) God reveals (perceivable); Satan tempts one (perception) to hide among another (suggested).
That being said...others suggest the labels "God + Satan" and ones consent holds onto them.
openly offers in return for ones soul
a) Soul/sole aka whole (oneness) openly offering partials (ones) a free will of choice to be.
b) Return implies "responding to turn" aka ones free will of choice to turn against being (perception) directed (perceivable).
c) Few suggest many that return means "turning back", yet ones consent to any suggestion implies turning away from back (origin) towards front (outcome).
Your biggest tip is how those who got injected, some are emanting a "mac address" you can get on gear we have. Lemme get a clip about that.
Segment from "THE BIG RESET MOVIE (ENG) The uncensored documentary about the truth of the pandemic". In this 8 minute part, they research how 86% of those who got covid vaccines were registering as emanating a MAC address on computer devices. They go out in the wilderness with test groups.
Dr. James Giordano: The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future
Modern War Institute
254K views 5 years ago
Dr. James Giordano, Chief of the Neuroethics Studies Program and Scholar-in-Residence in the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics at Georgetown University, speaks to cadets and faculty about how advancements in neuroscience and neurotechnology will impact the future of war. This event was hosted by the Modern War Institute at West Point
Some kids were watching it while i was installing kitchen cabinets a few weeks ago.
I thought the movie shows schizofrenia or how emotions/feelings and perception effect a person's outlook and behavior. I didn't think the movie was too bad. The kids learn about anger, joy, sadness, goofiness, etc and maybe learn not to be a slave to their feelings.
I dont trust disney or hollywood so i'm sure there's some satanic subliminal messaging that i didn't notice because i was a bit preoccupied.
Really it is not that hard to use even worst Holliwood production to educate kids about narratives, malicious intents of movies creators and all that crap. :) Kids imagination is powerful enough to imagine that Hollywood hero could be really anti-hero and they really like that approach and questioning protagonist actions. You could easily show them how Hollywood protagonists betray their own, don't care about regular people, how egoistic they are, how arrogant and ignorant, how they do shit left and right and there are tons of such examples in modern Hollywood movies.
Just don't leave kids alone with Hollywood. :) And it is really fun for youself to watch child movies from that angle together with kids.
Looking into a suggested screen contradicts that.
Watching implies binding self to the suggested information on screen while getting emotionally manipulated.
Watching what others are showing establishes a bond of trust aka binding consent to a suggestion.
If watcher submits (sub); then shown message limits (limen) watchers sight.
To watch is to observe
To observe is not consent nor acceptance nor approval of what is being observed.
I can listen to what satan suggests but reject it, disagree with it, condemn it, and disapprove of it.
To not subject oneself to the will of God, or to the temptations of satan is to hide.
One can walk freely in the world with the power to glorify GOD and the power to reject what satan openly offers in return for ones soul.
a) Observe/observo - "to keep; hold". Perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto...it's suggested (information) which tempts ones consent to keep holding onto it, while "serving" others.
b) Watch/wake (to arise) + weg (being lively) implies inception of ones life.
Furthermore...Weg (German way) implies being lively (life) within process of dying (inception towards death) aka ones way of life.
c) TO implies towards aka "inception towards death"; into which ones life comes to be.
To/towards implies WAS (perceivable)...not IS (suggested).
Few trick many to suggest to each other what IS, while ignoring what WAS perceivable before ones perception can discern being within.
a) Notice that you choose to keep holding onto (ob-servo)...NOT + NOR (nothing or), which is based on ones consent to suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing).
Where else could one get "nothing" from; than from the suggestion of another?
b) Holding onto (observe) implies ones choice of want (holding onto) over need (letting go). Since one cannot hold onto perceivable; holding onto suggested implies ones consent to conflicts of reason (acceptance vs denial + approval vs disapproval).
a) Nature doesn't brand anything...hence "satan" implying ones consent to suggested satanism.
b) Satan/s-t-n/adversary - "to turn" implies turning (suggested) from being (perception) directed (perceivable) aka ones choice to ignore origin (god) for turning towards outcome (satan).
a) Will implies want (temptation), hence subjected to need (resistance).
b) Origin (god) doesn't require a free will of choice...each one within does, as to be able to respond to origin (need) or ignore it for outcome (want).
c) Being implies choice (matter) within balance (momentum) of god (motion).
a) Falling for temptation implies ignoring to resist.
b) Being implies rising (life) while falling (inception towards death).
c) Origin (all perceivable) reveals (ones perception)...outcome (suggested) hides origin from ones sight underneath ones "willing" ignorance.
d) God reveals (perceivable); Satan tempts one (perception) to hide among another (suggested).
That being said...others suggest the labels "God + Satan" and ones consent holds onto them.
a) Soul/sole aka whole (oneness) openly offering partials (ones) a free will of choice to be.
b) Return implies "responding to turn" aka ones free will of choice to turn against being (perception) directed (perceivable).
c) Few suggest many that return means "turning back", yet ones consent to any suggestion implies turning away from back (origin) towards front (outcome).
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Elvis-presley-return-to-sender-lyrics
Postman (motion) - Sack (momentum) - Letter (matter)
Or maybe it's just a film where emotions are personified.
Your biggest tip is how those who got injected, some are emanting a "mac address" you can get on gear we have. Lemme get a clip about that.
Segment from "THE BIG RESET MOVIE (ENG) The uncensored documentary about the truth of the pandemic". In this 8 minute part, they research how 86% of those who got covid vaccines were registering as emanating a MAC address on computer devices. They go out in the wilderness with test groups.
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/17rSjCnDBy/segment-from-the-big-reset-movie/c
This is just the tip of the iceberg of the tech we can detect. You need to do research about military tech they had before the covid.
Steve Hoffman - Brain Hacking & MindTech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_TQBjFkv1Q
Dr. James Giordano: The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future
Modern War Institute
254K views 5 years ago Dr. James Giordano, Chief of the Neuroethics Studies Program and Scholar-in-Residence in the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics at Georgetown University, speaks to cadets and faculty about how advancements in neuroscience and neurotechnology will impact the future of war. This event was hosted by the Modern War Institute at West Point
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N02SK9yd60s
Their AI is just monitoring everybody these days to see how the collective consciousness functions.
Look around for Yuval Noah Harari, mentioning in videos, "biometric surveillance" "under the skin".
I had a look at how brain implants (Neuralink) are doing in 2024.
But as weeks passed, about 85 percent of the device’s tendrils slipped out of his brain.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/22/health/elon-musk-brain-implant-arbaugh.html
Looks like our immune system is destroying any computer chips people are trying to put in their brain.
Makes sense that they're trying to destroy the immune system with 10 tons of garbage "vax" sticks.