Hmm
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
What if the guy on the rooftop wasn't the guy who actually shot at Trump, but merely a decoy (scapegoat) ?
What do you think of this theory?
Need to analyze the angles and possibility of a "second shooter" aka the real one.
Also, if this one an inside job, i think they intended to hit him. They messed up. They missed. They were not supposed to miss. "Grazing" his ear was not the intention. Heh?
SKY news did an interview of a guy that said the guy who was killed was shot from behind Trump, that he got in the way. Shooter on the roof may have been a decoy
It's possible Crooks was a scapegoat, but early reports are making this very very hard to fake safely.
The AP photo series shows (1) the bullet in flight while Trump's hand is open and empty, (2) Trump's hand to his ear, (3) Trump staring at his bloody hand. Surprisingly hard to fake. Penn & Teller would turn this job down.
The blood on the bleachers and the doctor's T-shirt is not easy to fake, but it's within realm of possibility.
4chan has someone claiming to be one of these two men saying he was not permitted to fire for 3 minutes, he fired after the shots began, and he was fired for it. That may be larping but it shows understanding RoE is essential and the public will want a statement soon about that.
The bullet in flight picture is so unbelievable. What are the odds?
With the number of cameras and the number of bullets, not that surprising! But unless someone runs it on a heat map and finds it suspect, it appears we must take it as real because of its instant production. Even Obama's long-form birth certificate took all weekend to fake. God has ways of giving the glory to himself alone.
Add: Last night I considered that even if Trump's initial blood could be faked, I see no way the white hats would allow anyone of their own premeditatedly to serve as the shooter's corpse, and I see no way they could trust anyone else to perform the activity demanded. Even as a skeptic searching for alternate conclusions I remain unable to avoid the only conclusion being the shooter had intent to kill.
Add: The theory could be falsified if there were evidence the photos of the dead shooter were taken on a different day than the 13th. I'm keeping alert to any analyses of anomalies in photos. Similarly, may Comperatore rest in peace, but I'm certain his family would be civilly open to detailed questioning to ascertain their narrative is fully confirmed, because no cameras were on Corey when he was hit.