Note that the same guy written an entire thread defending the middle ages and ignoring the fact that if you are anything other than the rich or the Papacy, you are dead (citing the mamgificent wonders that are ancient churches). It is a Jewish utopia feeding on the deaths of "heretic" European Goyim whose crime is being the descendant of Greeks, Romans and Nordics or didn't believe in Blood God faith.
And then there are people on the comments section on another post that said that they want Feudalism more than "whatever we have today".
Even on this board there are people defending the Middle Ages, claiming that it is better than in the present day.
I dunno if they are bots or government shills, but when Feudalism returns for real you will die and there is nothing you can do about it.
The rich and the church gets richer while you can have fun dying of rat plagues and being kept under the dark why does Europe have out of control rat plagues while China does not. (Notice the obsession with "bloodletting" as a solution to rat plagues)
The entire thing is fully normalized manufactured consent...and if you wonder why we are on the way to LGBT genderfluid hell, this is it.
Note also that "food" aparently comes from the government in this world, and the peasants just "farm the land" and "pay rent", denoting that this was written by a retarded commie.
It was. All anti-monarchists are commies or commie-adjacent (libtards and lolberts). "All hierarchies are bad - liberte, egalite, fraternite, chud!" Never mind (((who))) brought communist enslavement to the world both in theory and in practice.
The entire thing is fully normalized manufactured consent...and if you wonder why we are on the way to LGBT genderfluid hell, this is it.
Do you realize the whole "me and muh freedoms" secular humanist movement that brought you the sexual revolution, feminism, relativism, scientism, skittles and a whole slew of other degeneracy is direct logical result of the liberal freemason (meaning jewish) worldview adopted at the time of the 18th century revolutions?
Western Christianity was corrupted a long time ago (1054 officially), but still it upheld Christian morality and social cohesion and most of all - it was the bulwark against the jewish world order (that's why jews hate Christianity and know it's their only true enemy; usury was banned in Christian kingdoms because it's sinful). That dam has broken by the 20th century and the jews were given Palestine by the British zionists like Balfour, Rothschild and Churchill and the US shills like Roosevelt. By denouncing Christianity, you're basically cutting off the branch you're sitting on without realizing it. There's no meaningful conservatism without it (what are you conserving exactly?)
Do you realize the whole "me and muh freedoms" secular humanist movement that brought you the sexual revolution, feminism, relativism, scientism, skittles and a whole slew of other degeneracy is direct logical result of the liberal freemason (meaning jewish) worldview adopted at the time of the 18th century revolutions?
They need to subvert the Renaissance movements somehow using another disguise given their defeat after their "treatment" towards the Bubonic Plague was way too humiliating. Feminism and Communism in the French Revolution was the first step in attempting their vengeance.
Western Christianity was corrupted a long time ago (1054 officially), but still it upheld Christian morality and social cohesion and most of all - it was the bulwark against the jewish world order (that's why jews hate Christianity and know it's their only true enemy; usury was banned in Christian kingdoms because it's sinful). That dam has broken by the 20th century and the jews were given Palestine by the British zionists like Balfour, Rothschild and Churchill and the US shills like Roosevelt.
First thing. Usury is banned, sure, but you know what isn't? Killing people who disagree with you, serfdom or falsely curing rat plagues through bloodletting. These people are hypocritical. They love to allow one thing and disallow the other equally deadly thing.
The other one; you named the guy who gave the Jews Palestine wrong. He's not called Churchill and Roosevelt, he's called Hitler, a wedlock bastard of the Rothschilds. Although Churchill funded Hitler in the first place to exterminate the German race, commit mass blood sacrifices for Moloch and making Nationalism automatically synonymous with clowns and enemies of the master ideology.
They need to subvert the Renaissance movements somehow using another disguise given their defeat after their "treatment" towards the Bubonic Plague was way too humiliating. Feminism and Communism in the French Revolution was the first step in attempting their vengeance.
What you fail to understand is the humanistic ideas behind the Renaissance, which were the result of Catholic theological errors (like natural theology - basically preferring empiricism and naturalism instead of God's own Revelation, which slowly but surely erased God from the picture because who needs Him when we have the soyence, right?) and pagan cuckery are what brought the later developments in European ideas during the Enlightenment and on. People started to question the validity of the Christian faith and morals and started experimenting with other forms of government and social structures. And here we are now.
The irony is the Renaissance you venerate so much was a child of the Western Catholic Church, its clergy, philosophy, art and sensibilities.
The other one; you named the guy who gave the Jews Palestine wrong. He's not called Churchill and Roosevelt, he's called Hitler, a wedlock bastard of the Rothschilds.
I'm still waiting for you "Hitler was a dirty jew" truthers to present evidence for your claims. Common sense and basic knowledge of history points the other way, but who knows, maybe he played some sort of 4D chess and his war against the jewish financial establishment, taking Germany off the usury system and his nationalization of the Reichsbank could all be a plot to help the zionists.
People started to question the validity of the Christian faith and morals and started experimenting with other forms of government and social structures. And here we are now.
I already said this before. Nothing the elite cannot take advantage of. As long as the key personnel are not uprooted, they can always come back for revenge using another mask. Just because the scam changed skins doesn't mean it's not a scam.
he played some sort of 4D chess and his war against the jewish financial elite, taking Germany off the usury system and his nationalization of the Reichsbank could all be a plot to help the zionists.
Conveniently avoids Switzerland during WWII, kills Germans more than Jews in the Holocaust and fails invasion efforts on purpose. It's not a coincidence, the Jews love to downplay the amount of people killed by Hitler regardless of race and only ring it back to "6 million Jews" -- a minority of the people dead (the narrative makes no sense because elite genocides kill several millions on a minimum, if it's just 6M Jews they betray their own goal of unhinged mass death).
Being implies ONE among other...it implies ignorance of ONEself to view self as part of other.
a jewish utopia feeding on...Goyim
a) If feeding is an utopia/ideal/imagination, then what generates hunger?
b) Why are there always more goyim than jew...more students than teachers; more followers than leaders; more poor than rich; more slaves than masters; more prey than predators; more many than few?
Feudalism implies suggestion (service) by few tempting consent (embracing) by many, and each one of many utilizes free will of choice to hold onto the suggested -ism.
genderfluid
Generation (motion) implies fluid (momentum) for regenerating solid (matter)...form (life) can be tricked to ignore flow (inception towards death) by holding onto other form, hence ignoring to regenerate itself.
The entire thing is fully normalized manufactured consent
a) Normal (want) implies versus abnormal (not want)...a conflict of reason shaped by ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring perceivable need.
b) What's the opposite of normal/standard? Alternative aka ones adaptation to all perceivable, which one ignores when holding onto a suggested standard.
c) Nature doesn't manufacture consent...it forces adaptation by setting apart manual (life) within auto (inception towards death).
Homo-shlomo (homogeneity of peace/piece) offers the service of manufactured consent by tempting gentiles to willingly give manual consent to the suggested service...for a reasonable price.
Note that the same guy written an entire thread defending the middle ages and ignoring the fact that if you are anything other than the rich or the Papacy, you are dead (citing the mamgificent wonders that are ancient churches). It is a Jewish utopia feeding on the deaths of "heretic" European Goyim whose crime is being the descendant of Greeks, Romans and Nordics or didn't believe in Blood God faith.
And then there are people on the comments section on another post that said that they want Feudalism more than "whatever we have today".
Even on this board there are people defending the Middle Ages, claiming that it is better than in the present day.
I dunno if they are bots or government shills, but when Feudalism returns for real you will die and there is nothing you can do about it.
The rich and the church gets richer while you can have fun dying of rat plagues and being kept under the dark why does Europe have out of control rat plagues while China does not. (Notice the obsession with "bloodletting" as a solution to rat plagues)
The entire thing is fully normalized manufactured consent...and if you wonder why we are on the way to LGBT genderfluid hell, this is it.
Note also that "food" aparently comes from the government in this world, and the peasants just "farm the land" and "pay rent", denoting that this was written by a retarded commie.
It was. All anti-monarchists are commies or commie-adjacent (libtards and lolberts). "All hierarchies are bad - liberte, egalite, fraternite, chud!" Never mind (((who))) brought communist enslavement to the world both in theory and in practice.
Do you realize the whole "me and muh freedoms" secular humanist movement that brought you the sexual revolution, feminism, relativism, scientism, skittles and a whole slew of other degeneracy is direct logical result of the liberal freemason (meaning jewish) worldview adopted at the time of the 18th century revolutions?
Western Christianity was corrupted a long time ago (1054 officially), but still it upheld Christian morality and social cohesion and most of all - it was the bulwark against the jewish world order (that's why jews hate Christianity and know it's their only true enemy; usury was banned in Christian kingdoms because it's sinful). That dam has broken by the 20th century and the jews were given Palestine by the British zionists like Balfour, Rothschild and Churchill and the US shills like Roosevelt. By denouncing Christianity, you're basically cutting off the branch you're sitting on without realizing it. There's no meaningful conservatism without it (what are you conserving exactly?)
They need to subvert the Renaissance movements somehow using another disguise given their defeat after their "treatment" towards the Bubonic Plague was way too humiliating. Feminism and Communism in the French Revolution was the first step in attempting their vengeance.
First thing. Usury is banned, sure, but you know what isn't? Killing people who disagree with you, serfdom or falsely curing rat plagues through bloodletting. These people are hypocritical. They love to allow one thing and disallow the other equally deadly thing.
The other one; you named the guy who gave the Jews Palestine wrong. He's not called Churchill and Roosevelt, he's called Hitler, a wedlock bastard of the Rothschilds. Although Churchill funded Hitler in the first place to exterminate the German race, commit mass blood sacrifices for Moloch and making Nationalism automatically synonymous with clowns and enemies of the master ideology.
What you fail to understand is the humanistic ideas behind the Renaissance, which were the result of Catholic theological errors (like natural theology - basically preferring empiricism and naturalism instead of God's own Revelation, which slowly but surely erased God from the picture because who needs Him when we have the soyence, right?) and pagan cuckery are what brought the later developments in European ideas during the Enlightenment and on. People started to question the validity of the Christian faith and morals and started experimenting with other forms of government and social structures. And here we are now.
The irony is the Renaissance you venerate so much was a child of the Western Catholic Church, its clergy, philosophy, art and sensibilities.
I'm still waiting for you "Hitler was a dirty jew" truthers to present evidence for your claims. Common sense and basic knowledge of history points the other way, but who knows, maybe he played some sort of 4D chess and his war against the jewish financial establishment, taking Germany off the usury system and his nationalization of the Reichsbank could all be a plot to help the zionists.
I already said this before. Nothing the elite cannot take advantage of. As long as the key personnel are not uprooted, they can always come back for revenge using another mask. Just because the scam changed skins doesn't mean it's not a scam.
Conveniently avoids Switzerland during WWII, kills Germans more than Jews in the Holocaust and fails invasion efforts on purpose. It's not a coincidence, the Jews love to downplay the amount of people killed by Hitler regardless of race and only ring it back to "6 million Jews" -- a minority of the people dead (the narrative makes no sense because elite genocides kill several millions on a minimum, if it's just 6M Jews they betray their own goal of unhinged mass death).
Being implies ONE among other...it implies ignorance of ONEself to view self as part of other.
a) If feeding is an utopia/ideal/imagination, then what generates hunger?
b) Why are there always more goyim than jew...more students than teachers; more followers than leaders; more poor than rich; more slaves than masters; more prey than predators; more many than few?
Does nature generate more than each ONE?
FEU'DAL, adjective - "embracing tenures by services" + TEN'URE, noun (Latin teneo) - "to hold".
Feudalism implies suggestion (service) by few tempting consent (embracing) by many, and each one of many utilizes free will of choice to hold onto the suggested -ism.
Generation (motion) implies fluid (momentum) for regenerating solid (matter)...form (life) can be tricked to ignore flow (inception towards death) by holding onto other form, hence ignoring to regenerate itself.
a) Normal (want) implies versus abnormal (not want)...a conflict of reason shaped by ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring perceivable need.
b) What's the opposite of normal/standard? Alternative aka ones adaptation to all perceivable, which one ignores when holding onto a suggested standard.
c) Nature doesn't manufacture consent...it forces adaptation by setting apart manual (life) within auto (inception towards death).
Homo-shlomo (homogeneity of peace/piece) offers the service of manufactured consent by tempting gentiles to willingly give manual consent to the suggested service...for a reasonable price.