Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

11
These are 100% real astronauts practicing for a 100% real MOON MISSION. Nothing FAKE AND GAY here at all. (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 1 year ago by MOCKxTHExCROSS 1 year ago by MOCKxTHExCROSS +15 / -4
6 comments download share
6 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (6)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– MOCKxTHExCROSS [S] 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Our DIVERSITY is our STRENGTH

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– freedomlogic 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

I admit, this looks pretty corny, but again I like to look at both sides. Which is why I cant quite make up my mind about the moon landing (yes literal walking contradiction). Like ive said maybe a thousand times before. We either made it, and never left. Or we didnt make it at all.

Alot of evidence suggests they didnt make it, but considering how many people are involved with getting people to low earth orbit, it feels like its a hard thing to deny. I just dont think organic matter can go any further, even with our current levels of technology, let alone 60+ years ago? Just seems, implausible.

Anyway, looking at this objectively. They dont look to be part of the inner suit/vacuum, but some kind of exoskeleton/pack or something.

Im guessing they need shielding over the shoulders/hips, joints where its easy to snag on something.

https://physicsworld.com/a/long-distance-space-travel-addressing-the-radiation-problem/

Space radiation is currently regarded as the most limiting factor for long-distance space travel because exposure to it is associated with significant negative effects on the human body. However, data on these effects are currently only available for those members of the Apollo programme that travelled as far as the Moon – too small a number from which to draw any significant conclusions about the effects of the space environment on the human body. In addition, although exposure to space radiation, including galactic cosmic rays and solar “proton storms”, has previously been linked to the development of cancer and neurological problems, data on the consequences of space radiation exposure for the cardiovascular system are lacking.

If they really made it, it was proably a miracle no one ended up sterile or insane.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– deleted -2 points 1 year ago +2 / -4
▲ 6 ▼
– Dorktron4Runner 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Nah, this is Tallest’s argument too and it doesn’t work for me. The main beneficiaries of the moon landing are worldwide governments and endless money laundering, led by ZOG and the U.S. dollar. It’s still a Synagogue operation. The US government was beholden to ZOG long before 1969. The supposed moon landing event also established TeeVee as THE information conduit feeding people goyslop in every home in the world. My argument is it was one of (or THE) main events that established TeeVee as a household staple and is still present worldwide today. People now believe everything their TeeVee tells them and it stems from staged events like the moon landing. These types of worldwide, staged events are no longer (or rarely) needed because TeeVee is everywhere now.

Objectively, the simplest solution is the answer. Is it easier to fake the moon landing in 1969 or to actually go there, land, take pics, return, and have no operational issues whatsoever? Watch the Apollo astronaut interviews after their supposed return to Earth. They are emotionless, uncomfortable, almost captive in their responses. Subsequently, there have been very few astronaut interviews given over the years and even those have conflicting information and responses.

I think most of us who have been around a while agree that white man’s achievements are constantly under attack but I see this as a ZOG operation that hasn’t needed any updates since 1969. If you talk to young people (junior or high schoolers), there is a healthy percentage that question the moon landing because of the internet and the lack of progress made (since 1969…over 50 years!) which highlight more discrepancies now.

May be of interest: https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– muhqtardtho 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

This is also why Hollywood goes so hard on the 'weirdos' that 'don't own a tv' in their content. The cord cutting generation forced their hand into moving narrative control over to the internet. The youtube pscore, the fake propped up news aggregate sites like reddit, paying off independent content creators to serve the narrative etc. Old heads remember the internet of the past and it resembles nothing like it does now.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SmithW1984 5 points 1 year ago +6 / -1

Cope. We never went to the moon, it was a cold war psy op, and even if we did who cares? It's a stupid pointless achievement to begin with. Only brainwashed CIA/NASA-cucked scientismo soyjacks get all excited about it.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy