Zionist Kicks Like A Bitch
(twitter.com)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Don't give our tax money to either side.
In what practical way could that be accomplished?
Modern lobbying is blatant corruption
You have this US taxpayer money ----- Mkay
You do not give it away ----- Mkay
Lets say you pull a Wesley Snipes and refuse to pay income tax you'd still end up paying tax on everything you buy, property tax, estate tax ect. I don't think you've thought this out thats why I asked for a practical solution
tariffs --- like the US originally did
That would involve an entirely different government than what we currently have, the people on TV wearing suits who call themselves politicians don't have any actual power. The corporations that got them elected are calling the shots and any disruption of profit would not serve their interests. We live in a corporate feudal authoritarian state. I agree with you on principle because I don't think many Americans consider themselves complicit in the atrocities our government commits and funds in our names but we are fully complicit.
a) Being implies in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...not either (one of two); but odd (ones) within even (oneness).
b) Tax implies a burden (suggested information) taken on (consent) by oneself from another...meanwhile; nature (inception towards death) sets one free (life) aka relieves all burdens.
c) Suggested "our" (plural) tempts perceiving "one" (singular) to ignore self for holding onto others, hence burdening self with a tax.
d) Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) relief (life)...taking on artificial suggestions permits others to tax one with burdens to carry.
e) "don't" implies doing nothing aka the suggested inversion of being done within everything perceivable. Furthermore...nothing aka suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to de-nial perceivable.
f) "to" aka towards implies motion generating momentum (balance) for matter (choice) within aka ones free sight in-between dominating sides.
Do not give our tax money to either side.
a) Blorg flibbles in-splat (zibber) flargs (blort/doof)...not either (quark of two); but sploom (woozles) within bloop (zibble).
b) Wibble wobbles a blorp (zizzle snazzle) taken on (grib) by oneself from another...woozle; glorp (wizzle towards doof) sets one free (zibber) aka relieves all blorps.
c) Zizzle "our" (flibble) splooms perceiving "one" (bloop) to ignore self for holding onto splats, hence blorping self with a zibble.
d) Only glorp gives (splorg) and takes (doof) zibber (life)...taking on zizzle splooms permits others to zibble one with blorps to carry.
e) "don't" wobbles doing nothing aka the sploomed inversion of being blopped within everything splorgable. Furthermore...nothing aka sploomed zibber-ism (Latin splorg; nothing) splooms one to de-splorg splorgable.
f) "to" aka splorgs wobbles flibber generating zibber (blorp) for zibber (glorp) within aka ones free splorg in-between wizzle sides.
That's how easy revisionism is...just shaping suggested information by free will of choice. The issue...tempting others to consent to it.
What I do is way harder for others...resisting suggested information, while adapting to perceivable inspiration.
Presenting perspective proves problematic: people perpetuate preferred propaganda, persuading peers passively. Pondering prevents partiality, promoting perceptive patience. Persistently processing plausible premises, practicing principled perseverance, possibly pioneering profound progress.
Hence sight being SPEC; special; particular to each one.
Propaganda implies suggested information; preference implies consenting choice.
Active (inception towards death) generates passive (life)...persuasion (temptation) and deterrence (resistance) simultaneously, hence those within having a free will of choice.
Pondering upon suggestions of another tempts ONE to ignore self...one remains partial within whole; yet within the collectivism by another...by a chosen one.
Pondering over outcome increases PATIENCE, noun ([Latin patientia, from patior, to suffer) within origin.
a) If velocity (inception towards death) generates resistance (life); then persistent frequency can be mimicked to distract resistance from frequenting free will of choice to resist.
b) A suggested premise sends on a mission towards, which in return tempts one to ignore being (life) send (inception towards death)...which isn't plausible/agreeable/acceptable unless one wants to destroy self.
Principle (inception) generates perseverance (life)...during that one is being tempted to follow suggested theory; while resisting perceivable praxis.
a) The way (inception towards death) doesn't need to be prepared (pioneered) for others...it processes each potential within naturally.
b) Suggested "profound" tempts one to ignore that foundation (all) exists before being (one) comes to be within.
Which wars did Muslims start?
Do you know what false flags are? Who funds the wars? Did you ever consider that the same evil goblins profit from both sides of the war? What do you "win" in a war? If you are trillions in debt, didn't gain any land or resources, lost lives of white Christians, jews suffer no loss of life, then what did you gain? What do you think it means for white Christians to win a war? To turn over all of eastern europe to jew bolshevik communists? To bring in hundreds of thousands of jew immigrants into your country after the war and let them infest all your institutions?
Hamas is funded by israel and Israel is funded by America. So if Hamas are terrorists then Americans funded them. ZOG of America provided the seed money to start the fucking operation up which means ZOG of America started the conflict / false flag attack / genocide operation in Gaza. Jews control America centrally via the Federal Reserve System so jews funded jews who funded terrorist operatives to conduct false flag for justification for jews to kill non-jews and genocide and clear out prime coastal real estate.
Where are muslims involved in any of this? As the operatives for hire? As the scapegoats? As the victims of Jews raiding and bombing Gaza?
If a jew pays for and provided a muslim a gun and then films the muslim pointing it at someone then who is worse in this scenario? Who paid for and trained Osama bin Laden or one of these other muslims? The CIA? And who runs the CIA? Obviously zionists do. Zionists worship Jews so you're right back at your primary suspect. Jews.
This leads me to conclude that white anti-zionist Christians should neither trust the jew nor the muslim as they seem to work together far more than the white Christian is led to believe. Jews and muslims conspire against the supreme white man.
What's the source for your version? Fox news?
Even AI generated answers admit that Israel funded and supported Hamas both financially and militarily.
So what I am saying is not even controversial anymore. The evidence is too abundant for google or fake fact checkers to try to deny it anymore.
Israel has the largest spy apparatus in the world. You don't think they knew what Hamas was doing when they both fund it and provide its weapons? LOL Stop being a naive boomer. This isn't sunday night football. Geo-political politics are not for simps rooting for first downs.
What do you even mean when you ask for "sources" ? What you want me to do is list a jewish owned periodical. Because you know jews own all the major news outlets and if i must link to a jewish periodical then it's been scrubbed and edited by lying kikes. So just the fact that you demand someone list a jewish publication as a "source" means you are completely brainwashed by a jewish sphere of propaganda.
Palestine is occupied by Israel, Palestinians have a right to resist per the UN and international law.
https://www.cjpme.org/fs_236/
Get yo' learn on retard! Ignorance will not save you.
The United States was founded with intention of rebelling against English colonization. The right to resist is a human right independent of who recognizes it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_resist
False dichotomy turbo
They do because Israel is voluntarily part of the UN. By joining the UN Israel gave them influence in Israeli affairs of state