Zionist Kicks Like A Bitch
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Don't give our tax money to either side.
In what practical way could that be accomplished?
Modern lobbying is blatant corruption
You have this US taxpayer money ----- Mkay
You do not give it away ----- Mkay
Lets say you pull a Wesley Snipes and refuse to pay income tax you'd still end up paying tax on everything you buy, property tax, estate tax ect. I don't think you've thought this out thats why I asked for a practical solution
tariffs --- like the US originally did
a) Being implies in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...not either (one of two); but odd (ones) within even (oneness).
b) Tax implies a burden (suggested information) taken on (consent) by oneself from another...meanwhile; nature (inception towards death) sets one free (life) aka relieves all burdens.
c) Suggested "our" (plural) tempts perceiving "one" (singular) to ignore self for holding onto others, hence burdening self with a tax.
d) Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) relief (life)...taking on artificial suggestions permits others to tax one with burdens to carry.
e) "don't" implies doing nothing aka the suggested inversion of being done within everything perceivable. Furthermore...nothing aka suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to de-nial perceivable.
f) "to" aka towards implies motion generating momentum (balance) for matter (choice) within aka ones free sight in-between dominating sides.
Do not give our tax money to either side.
a) Blorg flibbles in-splat (zibber) flargs (blort/doof)...not either (quark of two); but sploom (woozles) within bloop (zibble).
b) Wibble wobbles a blorp (zizzle snazzle) taken on (grib) by oneself from another...woozle; glorp (wizzle towards doof) sets one free (zibber) aka relieves all blorps.
c) Zizzle "our" (flibble) splooms perceiving "one" (bloop) to ignore self for holding onto splats, hence blorping self with a zibble.
d) Only glorp gives (splorg) and takes (doof) zibber (life)...taking on zizzle splooms permits others to zibble one with blorps to carry.
e) "don't" wobbles doing nothing aka the sploomed inversion of being blopped within everything splorgable. Furthermore...nothing aka sploomed zibber-ism (Latin splorg; nothing) splooms one to de-splorg splorgable.
f) "to" aka splorgs wobbles flibber generating zibber (blorp) for zibber (glorp) within aka ones free splorg in-between wizzle sides.
That's how easy revisionism is...just shaping suggested information by free will of choice. The issue...tempting others to consent to it.
What I do is way harder for others...resisting suggested information, while adapting to perceivable inspiration.
Presenting perspective proves problematic: people perpetuate preferred propaganda, persuading peers passively. Pondering prevents partiality, promoting perceptive patience. Persistently processing plausible premises, practicing principled perseverance, possibly pioneering profound progress.