Homosexuals explained.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Now replace gay with pedophile and see if the argument still holds.
What do you mean replace? They can be both, just like Barry and Michael.
That's a fair point. After all they always say "sexuality is a specter, it's not strictly defined", right? Why should we delineate between different kinds of sexual deviants?
An arguing mind implies ones consent holding onto a suggestion by another, while ignoring that perceivable moves. Ignorance implies a fictitious "still-stand" within self, which others exploit by tempting one into a fictitious stand-off against others called reasoning aka arguing.
While many argue pedophile vs gay; few gain the opportunity to exploit what many ignore while arguing against each other...like children for example.
We must keep our eyes at the children at all times. The reason those demons get to them is because we're being weak, apathetic and negligent.
"But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea." - Matthew 18:6
Spiritual practice. Many were healed. Many are literally possessed. This is why they are so given to lust, that they have hundreds of one night partners. Either their lustful ego posessed them or an astral entity, which is most likely. Try talking with spiritual science research foundation on this topic, they have answers from 40 years of research. they have a chat there.
Or better yet, open up the Bible at Mathew 19:11:
"Eunuchs who were born thus from their mother’s womb" here refers not just to asexual people, but to what modern people call "homosexuals". The people you see prancing at the demonic pride parades were meant for monastic life. Satan subverts and inverts all that is good. The wisdom of our science is worldly and limited but Jesus and His Church has told us everything we need to know.
Needing to resist wanted temptation. Sodomy implies want vs not want; while ignoring need.
Pretend (Latin proetendo; to stretch forward) tempts one to ignore being (life) within straight (inception towards death); hence needing to resist the wanted temptation to stretch forward.
Sex (Latin seco; to divide) implies setting apart, while marriage (Latin maritatu; to wed; entering into a wedlock) implies putting together...latter contradicts former.
Needing to set apart implies ones choice to resist; while wanting to put together implies ones choice falling for the temptation to ignore resisting.
Example...intercourse for off-spring implies a setting apart, for which one needs to resist wanted temptation. The less one resists; the more one tempts self to try something else....entrance sodomy; prostitution; abortion; sex-changes etc.
LET, verb - "to suffer; to permit"....only nature (inception towards death) permits suffering (life). Resistance diminishes suffering; temptation diminishes resistance. Life needs to resist wanted temptation, while suffering within the process of dying.
Full implies "containing all that can be received"; which implies ones possessiveness (to receive; to take into possession) over suggested information, contained within ones consenting mind/memory; hence "contain-ment".
Meanwhile in reality...perceivable inspiration flows (inception towards death) through each form (life) and cannot be held onto aka taken possession of aka contained within memory.
Ones denial of perceivable for suggested implies "emptiness", and ones possessiveness of suggested implies "fulfillment".
CELIBATE, noun - "a single life" aka being (bate) sole (celi) implies as one (partial) within oneness (whole).
Celibacy implies each ones status quo of being, which few corrupt by tempting many to "marry" aka to willingly consent to be united in wedlock aka binding together as the inversion of being set apart from one another.
a) "Christ's Second Appearing" implies anointed ones (christ) coming into light (appear) by division (Latin seco; to divide) of whole (oneness) into partials (ones).
The trick...suggesting one that "christ" is another, hence tempting one to count/enumerate/reckon together other ones as second; third; fourth etc.
b) "known as Shaking Quakers" implies shaking (inception towards death) + quaking (life) aka motion generating emotions.
Shaking implies setting apart; quacking implies convulsing together....hence one needing to "shake your booty" aka letting go of what one holds onto.
Another sleight of hand: "Shake, shake, shake, Señora, shake your body line...work, work, work, Señora, work your body line" aka senor (motion) + senora (momentum) for body (life) within line (inception towards death).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn3tUOJ9yv4
I don't think it's an island