Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

1
Nukes aren't real. Owen Benjamin reviews nuke test footage. FAKE AND GAY (www.bitchute.com)
posted 1 year ago by MOCKxTHExCROSS 1 year ago by MOCKxTHExCROSS +7 / -8
11 comments share
11 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (11)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– turtlebam 4 points 1 year ago +5 / -1

The truth is sometimes not so clear cut, nuke test footage may indeed be fake. It doesn't change the fact that Nukes may be real.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Questionable 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

He makes some valid points. But mostly is just talking at the camera.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MOCKxTHExCROSS [S] 2 points 1 year ago +3 / -1

Owen is best in small doses. However his analysis of the footage is spot on:

  • Camera angle all wrong
  • Camera location all wrong
  • Looks like crappy models from Godzilla

Also, wasn't the footage produced in Laurel Canyon? Very odd:

https://www.amazon.com/Weird-Scenes-Inside-Canyon-Laurel/dp/1909394122

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Questionable 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The camera shake critique seemed a bit lacking. As even with conventional explosives, the earth shakes, and would shake even bunkers. Other then that, yes, the buildings do look like miniatures, as their is not enough random debris, and it all behaves in a uniform manner. Unlike actual explosions we have seen since.

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=Beirut+explosion&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DoKFupx9x0-k

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– WindyJibbz 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

If you guys want a good source on this topic, and other narrative debunking check out the channel called Fakenukes on bitchute.

Nuclear bombs are as real as satellites and space travel.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MOCKxTHExCROSS [S] 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

agreed space is also fake and gay

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– muhqtardtho 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Does he bring up the 100k bombs they dropped on japan the day before the nuke was said to hit?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Questionable 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Did he happen to mention that random fact you happen to know off the top of your head? No, there is no reason he would do that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

If nukes are not real, then, nuclear power plants too. Both use exactly same physical process, difference is only in rate.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– WindyJibbz 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Nuclear power is simply enriched uranium rods heating a boiler. It’s a free source of heat, no fuel required. The nuclear bomb they say requires fission and to “split an atom”. They say to make the largest explosion possible, you need to split the smallest thing possible. Like they capture up an atom and stick it in the bomb with some uranium. It’s science junk, like global warming or big bang.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CrazyRussian 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

enriched uranium rods heating a boiler

Because of fission.

It’s a free source of heat, no fuel required

Enriched uranium is fuel.

The nuclear bomb they say requires fission and to “split an atom”.

This is exactly what happening in enriched uranium rods in nuclear power plants. Unstable uranium atoms split and produce heat, gamma rays and neutrons. Neutrons hit another uranium atoms provoking them to split and produce more heat and neutrons. Rate of reaction adjusted by how many neutrons hit another uranium atoms. Rate could vary from natural uranium decay when only tiny part of neutrons hit uranium atoms to nuclear blast.when nearly all neuthrons hit other uranium atoms. Nuclear power plants work in the middle of that range - faster than natural decay but slower than nuclear bomb.

It is like burning natural gas. You could burn it slowly in your gas stove, or you could fill a room and burn it all in once destroying building. Nuclear fission just produce much more energy than chemical process of burning.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy