Solar events are catalogued and written about in history for hundreds of years before the creation of Internet and satellites. It's just the frequency and scales are hotly debated (i.e. we likely do not know). Here's hoping for a big one...
We will not see one in our life time. There is no evidence of drastic instability on the surface of the Sun and besides the fact we still do not know the actual composition of a star's interior, we can not actually predict with any credibility about solar events when our technical observations are both still fairly primitive and novel. Sure history has solar anomalies but those lack data. Our recent data for patterns is on par with Climate Change idiots presuming their science is indicative of history.. 150 years at best.
Ayh am not dumb enough to not see that as an oxymoron :)
If we did apply statistical information to power outages and EMP or EMP similiar disruptions, 99.9% of them favor not solar but instead human manufactured events. Thus aym statistically favoring a local event (DARPA?) as opposed to seeing every thing go black and an aurora overhead.
We haven't had neither for a long time. So sampling says : high uncertainty, non-calculable probability (or too wide bracket to be meaningful). Learn the difference. I suggest you take some math classes.
Solar events are catalogued and written about in history for hundreds of years before the creation of Internet and satellites. It's just the frequency and scales are hotly debated (i.e. we likely do not know). Here's hoping for a big one...
We will not see one in our life time. There is no evidence of drastic instability on the surface of the Sun and besides the fact we still do not know the actual composition of a star's interior, we can not actually predict with any credibility about solar events when our technical observations are both still fairly primitive and novel. Sure history has solar anomalies but those lack data. Our recent data for patterns is on par with Climate Change idiots presuming their science is indicative of history.. 150 years at best.
You are so sure of yourself on statistical probabilities. I'm not. Here we differ.
Ayh am not dumb enough to not see that as an oxymoron :)
If we did apply statistical information to power outages and EMP or EMP similiar disruptions, 99.9% of them favor not solar but instead human manufactured events. Thus aym statistically favoring a local event (DARPA?) as opposed to seeing every thing go black and an aurora overhead.
We haven't had neither for a long time. So sampling says : high uncertainty, non-calculable probability (or too wide bracket to be meaningful). Learn the difference. I suggest you take some math classes.