We will not see one in our life time. There is no evidence of drastic instability on the surface of the Sun and besides the fact we still do not know the actual composition of a star's interior, we can not actually predict with any credibility about solar events when our technical observations are both still fairly primitive and novel. Sure history has solar anomalies but those lack data. Our recent data for patterns is on par with Climate Change idiots presuming their science is indicative of history.. 150 years at best.
Ayh am not dumb enough to not see that as an oxymoron :)
If we did apply statistical information to power outages and EMP or EMP similiar disruptions, 99.9% of them favor not solar but instead human manufactured events. Thus aym statistically favoring a local event (DARPA?) as opposed to seeing every thing go black and an aurora overhead.
We will not see one in our life time. There is no evidence of drastic instability on the surface of the Sun and besides the fact we still do not know the actual composition of a star's interior, we can not actually predict with any credibility about solar events when our technical observations are both still fairly primitive and novel. Sure history has solar anomalies but those lack data. Our recent data for patterns is on par with Climate Change idiots presuming their science is indicative of history.. 150 years at best.
Ayh am not dumb enough to not see that as an oxymoron :)
If we did apply statistical information to power outages and EMP or EMP similiar disruptions, 99.9% of them favor not solar but instead human manufactured events. Thus aym statistically favoring a local event (DARPA?) as opposed to seeing every thing go black and an aurora overhead.
Ayh did --> geometry. Engineering is life. Stats, calc, diffs, are for desperate copers poisoning civilization with theoreticals.