Ayh am not dumb enough to not see that as an oxymoron :)
If we did apply statistical information to power outages and EMP or EMP similiar disruptions, 99.9% of them favor not solar but instead human manufactured events. Thus aym statistically favoring a local event (DARPA?) as opposed to seeing every thing go black and an aurora overhead.
We haven't had neither for a long time. So sampling says : high uncertainty, non-calculable probability (or too wide bracket to be meaningful). Learn the difference. I suggest you take some math classes.
You are so sure of yourself on statistical probabilities. I'm not. Here we differ.
Ayh am not dumb enough to not see that as an oxymoron :)
If we did apply statistical information to power outages and EMP or EMP similiar disruptions, 99.9% of them favor not solar but instead human manufactured events. Thus aym statistically favoring a local event (DARPA?) as opposed to seeing every thing go black and an aurora overhead.
We haven't had neither for a long time. So sampling says : high uncertainty, non-calculable probability (or too wide bracket to be meaningful). Learn the difference. I suggest you take some math classes.
Ayh did --> geometry. Engineering is life. Stats, calc, diffs, are for desperate copers poisoning civilization with theoreticals.